Category Archives: Cell phones

TN: Cell phone recently calling deceased and it being at scene of murder was nexus

The state showed nexus to defendant’s iPhone and the crime by known recent calls between the co-conspirators and the victim and the phone being at the scene of the crime. State v. Young, 2024 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 397 (Sep. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on TN: Cell phone recently calling deceased and it being at scene of murder was nexus

D.S.D.: Misidentifying cell phone make in SW no error where number and pass code were correct

Misidentifying defendant’s cell phone for a search warrant as a Motorola when it was a Samsung is a mistake that can be overlooked. It had the phone number in the warrant and defendant’s pass code opened it. Finally, the good … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Misidentifying cell phone make in SW no error where number and pass code were correct

DE: Changing cell phones doesn’t defeat nexus

The state showed nexus and no staleness in warrant for defendant’s cell phone for pornography despite the fact he had a different phone at the time of the search. State v. Clark, 2024 Del. Super. LEXIS 619 (Aug. 29, 2024). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on DE: Changing cell phones doesn’t defeat nexus

M.D.Ala.: Under Evans, DV OP justified stop that led to inventory even though it had unknowingly been set aside

The officer reasonably relied on a report from dispatch that defendant had a DV order of protection against him by his wife. After the stop and the inventory for towing his car, his estranged wife showed up with a copy … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Consent, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Under Evans, DV OP justified stop that led to inventory even though it had unknowingly been set aside

Cal.6: Cell phone SW was limited to a specific date and time for certain materials, but the search far exceeded it; suppressed, no GFE

The search warrant here was issued for evidence of a sexual assault of an adult. There were pretext text messages sent by the police pretending to be the victim to get an admission. When the search warrant was executed, child … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Good faith exception, Scope of search, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Cal.6: Cell phone SW was limited to a specific date and time for certain materials, but the search far exceeded it; suppressed, no GFE

D.Kan.: Reinstalling a deleted app to an iPhone to get to def’s account exceeded the scope of consent to search the phone

Defendant consented to a search of his iPhone, but here the officer reinstalled the Telegram app and then used it to search defendant’s Telegram account, finding child porn. All this exceeded his consent. There is no case in point because … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Scope of search, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Reinstalling a deleted app to an iPhone to get to def’s account exceeded the scope of consent to search the phone

N.D.Ga.: Having cell phone at scene of crime justifies its seizure under plain view

There was justification for the plain view seizure of defendant’s cell phone when it came to the scene of the crime with him. United States v. Dulaney, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151204 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 23, 2024).* “Saldana-Alaniz fails to … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Consent, Informant hearsay, Search incident | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Having cell phone at scene of crime justifies its seizure under plain view

CA11: Week’s delay in getting SW for cell phone was reasonable; def in custody and didn’t ask for it back.

The warrant for defendant’s cell phone wasn’t issued for a week, but the delay was reasonable. He was in jail with a diminished privacy interest, and he didn’t ask for it back. United States v. Watson, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, State constitution, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA11: Week’s delay in getting SW for cell phone was reasonable; def in custody and didn’t ask for it back.

TX: Court of Appeals required state to show more than necessary to show cell phone nexus; remanded

“To the extent that the court of appeals read our opinion in Baldwin necessarily to require, as a prerequisite of probable cause, that an affidavit must establish (1) use of the cell phone either during, or immediately before or after, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Nexus | Comments Off on TX: Court of Appeals required state to show more than necessary to show cell phone nexus; remanded

OR: First cell phone SW found unexpected SD card, second SW was tainted by overbreadth of first

Defendant’s cell phone was seized in 2011 and an SD card was unexpectedly found with sexual images of children. When defendant questioned that, a separate search warrant was sought for the SD card. The state does not show inevitable discovery … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery, Overbreadth | Comments Off on OR: First cell phone SW found unexpected SD card, second SW was tainted by overbreadth of first

CA11: No standing in geofence warrant for girlfriend’s cell phone location

Defendant lacks standing to challenge a geofence warrant directed at his girlfriend’s cell phone. “Davis lacks Fourth Amendment standing to challenge the geofence warrant because the search did not disclose any information about the data on his own electronic device, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, geofence, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: No standing in geofence warrant for girlfriend’s cell phone location

E.D.N.Y.: Showing nexus to a cell phone

Showing nexus in a search warrant affidavit between defendant’s cell phone and the crime. How much of the officer’s opinion matters? United States v. Santos, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133564 (E.D.N.Y. July 29, 2024):

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Showing nexus to a cell phone

TX3: Wife conducted private search of husband’s cell phone by using his thumb to open it while he was asleep

In Texas where a private search can be suppressed, defendant showed that his wife accessed his cell phone without his consent, and the search was suppressed. She used his thumb to open the phone while he was asleep. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Private search, Probable cause | Comments Off on TX3: Wife conducted private search of husband’s cell phone by using his thumb to open it while he was asleep

E.D.N.Y.: CBP needs SW for cell phone border search

This case involves a border search of defendant’s cell phone, followed by a search warrant, and child pornography was found. “Sultanov now seeks to suppress both the contents of his cell phones and the statements he made to law enforcement … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: CBP needs SW for cell phone border search

D.C.Cir.: SW for multiple cell phones was valid because all were shown to be involved

This search warrant for multiple cell phones showed enough that multiple cell phones were involved in the offense under investigation, and, thus, the warrant was not overbroad, distinguishing United States v. Griffith, 867 F.3d 1265 (D.C. Cir. 2017) where there … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Privileges, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: SW for multiple cell phones was valid because all were shown to be involved

MT: No REP from look in apt window from common area of apt complex; not his curtilage

Officers did not violate defendant’s reasonable expectation of privacy by looking in the window of his apartment from a common area in his apartment complex. It was not his curtilage. City of Whitefish v. Zumwalt, 2024 MT 153, 2024 Mont. … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Curtilage, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on MT: No REP from look in apt window from common area of apt complex; not his curtilage

S.D.N.Y.: Cell phone SW was “bare bones” on connection to the crime; no PC, no GFE

In this racketeering case, defendant admitted for purposes of the motion to suppress he was in the gang and that people engaged in violent acts. The government never showed probable cause to believe his cell phone had evidence of a … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Cell phone SW was “bare bones” on connection to the crime; no PC, no GFE

E.D.Mich.: Cell tower dump isn’t CSLI; doesn’t require PC, but just a court order

A cell tower dump isn’t CSLI, so actual probable cause isn’t required. Here, however, there was. In re United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128532 (E.D. Mich. July 18, 2024).* “Finally, the gratuitous physical aggression at the scene cannot be … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Custody, Voluntariness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Cell tower dump isn’t CSLI; doesn’t require PC, but just a court order

W.D.N.Y.: Def wearing a mask to make him harder to identify doesn’t immunize his arrest on a warrant

“Wearing a mask does not immunize a wanted person from a valid arrest warrant. Here, law enforcement properly executed an arrest warrant for Defendant Apprentiace Singletary. Singletary cannot argue that his arrest was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment because he … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Consent, Excessive force | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Def wearing a mask to make him harder to identify doesn’t immunize his arrest on a warrant

WA: Using software to search a cell phone doesn’t violate particularity

Use of software to search a cell phone did not violate the particularity of the warrant. The Fourth Amendment and the state constitution are intended to prevent a general rummaging, and the use of software facilitates people not looking at … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Informant hearsay, Particularity | Comments Off on WA: Using software to search a cell phone doesn’t violate particularity