Category Archives: Emergency / exigency

ND: Driver couldn’t consent to search of passenger’s backpack

The driver of a car could not consent to search of a backpack that by all accounts belonged to the passenger. It was where he sat, and the driver said it wasn’t hers. Inside was men’s clothes and stuff. State … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on ND: Driver couldn’t consent to search of passenger’s backpack

D.Minn.: Def’s PC suppression argument showed a trial defense, not an argment for suppression

Defendant’s objection to the R&R isn’t enough to overrule the USMJ’s finding there was probable cause. Defendant presents a trial defense, not a defense to probable cause. United States v. Cole, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 752 (D. Minn. Jan. 3, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def’s PC suppression argument showed a trial defense, not an argment for suppression

OH2: Pinging cell phone of suspect shortly after homicide was exigent

Pinging defendant’s cell phone to try to find him after he had shot three people seven hours apart was with exigent circumstances. This is already settled in this state. State v. Smith, 2023-Ohio-4565, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 4389 (2d Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH2: Pinging cell phone of suspect shortly after homicide was exigent

ND: It was unreasonable for police to think landowner who rented bedroom to another could consent to its search

Defendant stayed in a bedroom in another’s house, and he paid rent. It was unreasonable for officers to conclude that the homeowner could consent to search of the room. Also, the door to the room was closed when the police … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Emergency / exigency, Reasonableness | Comments Off on ND: It was unreasonable for police to think landowner who rented bedroom to another could consent to its search

IN: Patdown of man in medical distress before paramedics arrived was reasonable

Defendant’s patdown search when he was found lying in a parking lot in medical distress was objectively reasonable as an emergency search, if just for what was on him before paramedics arrived. Meth was found. Lack of a separate state … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on IN: Patdown of man in medical distress before paramedics arrived was reasonable

S.D.Ohio: Evidence in plain view may be seized during protective sweep

It was permissible for officers to seize firearms seen in plain view during this protective sweep. United States v. Riley, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198798 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 6, 2023). “Given the totality of the circumstances and the numerous distinctions … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Protective sweep | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Evidence in plain view may be seized during protective sweep

M.D.Pa.: Police continually banging on def’s door to come out was seizure; no exigency applies; suppressed

Defendant fled from the police in his car in a highspeed chase. They went to his house and came on to defendant’s curtilage, his porch, and shined flashlights through the windows. This was a search on a constitutionally protected area. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Police continually banging on def’s door to come out was seizure; no exigency applies; suppressed

NY: Inventory policies don’t have to be in writing to be reasonable

“There is no requirement that an inventory search protocol be written …, and courts will not ‘micromanage the procedures used to search properly impounded cars’ … ‘[R]easonable police regulations relating to inventory procedures administered in good faith satisfy the Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Geolocation data, Inventory | Comments Off on NY: Inventory policies don’t have to be in writing to be reasonable

D.N.M.: Police entry into a fire damaged home after fire was out and it was “all clear” violated 4A

There was a kitchen fire in defendant’s home, and firefighters told the police that there were unsecured handguns in the house. A police aide entered the house without a warrant and took them. The government argues the house was abandoned … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Burden of pleading, Emergency / exigency, Waiver | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Police entry into a fire damaged home after fire was out and it was “all clear” violated 4A

NY Suffolk Co.: Entry under Extreme Risk Protection Order statute for potential suicide was exigent

“The Court finds that the search conducted pursuant to the E[xtreme] R[isk] P[rotection] O[rder] statute was reasonable. P.O. Keenan provided sworn testimony as to the basis for his belief that defendant was expressing suicidal ideations (defendant’s text messages), and recounted … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY Suffolk Co.: Entry under Extreme Risk Protection Order statute for potential suicide was exigent

E.D.Tex.: Pretextual claim of emergency aid exception to conduct a drug search leads to suppression

Defendant was having a seizure in his underwear on the street, about two blocks from his home. Officers could tell the smell of PCP about him. Officers went to his house and the door was cracked. Looking through the door, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Knock and talk, Pretext | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Pretextual claim of emergency aid exception to conduct a drug search leads to suppression

N.D.Ind.: Covid mask requirements, contact tracing, and quarantine procedures did not violate 4A

Covid mask requirements, contact tracing, and quarantine procedures did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Plaintiffs don’t even say how. Skains v. Lake Cent. Sch. Corp., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134970 (N.D. Ind. Aug. 2, 2023):

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Covid mask requirements, contact tracing, and quarantine procedures did not violate 4A

CA5: No police wrongdoing here to support “police created exigency”

Defendant came in to the police for an interview about sex assault in the Army. As it developed, exigency for seizure of defendant’s cell phone arose. This was not a police created exigency which requires some wrongdoing on the part … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA5: No police wrongdoing here to support “police created exigency”

IN: 3 am entry into backyard to look for weapon when no one around couldn’t be justified by exigency

“There was no emergency here. Officer Eber and the trial court expressed concern that a firearm might have been lying in Hinton’s backyard and could be accessed by a child or other person. But, even if so, there was no … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Curtilage, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on IN: 3 am entry into backyard to look for weapon when no one around couldn’t be justified by exigency

E.D.Mich.: Claim of exaggerated facts doesn’t state Franks violation without showing intent to mislead

Defendant’s claim that the officer exaggerated some facts in the affidavit for warrant didn’t state a Franks challenge without an allegation it was done to mislead. United States v. Delgado, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121793 (E.D.Mich. July 14, 2023). “The … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Claim of exaggerated facts doesn’t state Franks violation without showing intent to mislead

CA3: Saying “this is not my backpack” when shown it during traffic stop is abandonment

“Small abandoned his legitimate expectation of privacy in the backpack. Although Small arguably demonstrated a subjective expectation of privacy by attempting to hide the backpack under his seat (though this act could also be viewed as an effort to physically … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA3: Saying “this is not my backpack” when shown it during traffic stop is abandonment

NJ: Smell of mj in the passenger compartment doesn’t justify search of trunk or engine compartment

Where the officer smelled marijuana in the passenger compartment and searched for it finding nothing, a search of the engine compartment and trunk was excessive under the automobile exception. From the syllabus : “Expanding the search to the engine compartment … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on NJ: Smell of mj in the passenger compartment doesn’t justify search of trunk or engine compartment

RI: Exigency of hot pursuit in a homicide case made pinging cell phone reasonable

Despite Carpenter saying it is limited to historical CSLI, this court concludes there is no meaningful difference between real-time and historical CSLI under Carpenter. Exigency, however, was real. The police were in hot pursuit seeking to question defendant for a … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Hot pursuit, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on RI: Exigency of hot pursuit in a homicide case made pinging cell phone reasonable

E.D.Tenn.: Undated controlled buys had to be in five weeks before SW, and that’s not stale

The multiple controlled buys were undated in the search warrant application, but the common sense reading was that they were in the five weeks before the warrant issued. That shows an ongoing drug operation, and it’s not stale. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Staleness, Standards of review | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Undated controlled buys had to be in five weeks before SW, and that’s not stale

FL1: If trial court refuses to unseal SW affidavit, in camera review must be sought to preserve issue

Defendant sought unsealing of the search warrant affidavit which the state successfully resisted on the ground of informant privilege in other ongoing investigations. The defense never sought in camera review. Without that, the issue was unpreserved for appellate review. Leverette … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, State constitution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on FL1: If trial court refuses to unseal SW affidavit, in camera review must be sought to preserve issue