E.D.Tenn.: Undated controlled buys had to be in five weeks before SW, and that’s not stale

The multiple controlled buys were undated in the search warrant application, but the common sense reading was that they were in the five weeks before the warrant issued. That shows an ongoing drug operation, and it’s not stale. United States v. Humphrey, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104201 (E.D. Tenn. May 26, 2023).*

Defendant’s claim counsel didn’t effectively investigate the search warrant process loses because there would no merit to a Fourth Amendment claim. People v. Thomas, 2023 NY Slip Op 03261, 2023 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3294 (3rd Dept. June 15, 2023).*

Defendant’s stop was justified by reasonable suspicion passed on by collective knowledge of other officers. United States v. Pounds, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 14838 (8th Cir. June 15, 2023).*

“The test of exigent circumstances for the making of an arrest for a felony without a warrant in West Virginia is whether, under the totality of the circumstances, the police had reasonable grounds to believe that if an immediate arrest were not made, the accused would be able to destroy evidence, flee or otherwise avoid capture, or might, during the time necessary to procure a warrant, endanger the safety or property of others. This is an objective test based on what a reasonable, well-trained police officer would believe.” Frazier v. Briscoe, 2023 W. Va. LEXIS 273 (June 15, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Collective knowledge, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Staleness, Standards of review. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.