Category Archives: Protective sweep

E.D.Pa.: Officer’s question about firearms in car made def unreasonably nervous

During a traffic stop, the officer’s question about weapons in the car resulted in defendant’s getting unusually nervous, his breathing completely changing where his chest rose and fell, and he refused to look the officer in the eye. That was … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Officer’s question about firearms in car made def unreasonably nervous

D.R.I.: Protective sweep unjustified; no reason to believe anyone else was there

Defendant’s premises had been under surveillance for days before the entry and protective sweep. There was no justification for the protective sweep because there was no reason to believe anyone else was there. United States v. Dacruz, 2023 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Independent source, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Protective sweep unjustified; no reason to believe anyone else was there

GA: Unjustified protective sweep suppressed

The “security sweep” of defendant’s dwelling violated the Fourth Amendment. No justification for the entry and no exigent circumstances were shown. Defendant’s alleged consent came after the unlawful entry. Denial of suppression reversed. Thompson v. State, 2023 Ga. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on GA: Unjustified protective sweep suppressed

E.D.Wis.: Innocent person whose property was seized can petition in criminal case for return of property

The court finds it has ancillary jurisdiction over a return of property question not directly involved in this case. Petitioner owned it and it was at the place searched and does hold evidence of crime. United States v. Solberg, 2023 … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Innocent person whose property was seized can petition in criminal case for return of property

OH10: Officer’s lack of knowledge of Covid extension of licenses was not reasonable mistake under Heien

The officer’s mistake of law in not knowing that an executive order that vehicle licenses expiring during Covid March 9, 2020 to December 1, 2020 remained valid was unreasonable under Heien. Heien requires ambiguity, and this wasn’t. Also, an unreasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH10: Officer’s lack of knowledge of Covid extension of licenses was not reasonable mistake under Heien

CA10 doesn’t have to decide whether furtive movement alone supports vehicle protective sweep

Furtive movements alone may or may not be enough to justify a protective sweep of a car, a question this circuit has never decided. Here, however, there was the additional fact of a “slow roll” to a stop which was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10 doesn’t have to decide whether furtive movement alone supports vehicle protective sweep

D.Md.: Surveillance and bodycam video supported officer’s contention def had a firearm in sweatshirt pocket

The court viewed the CCTV and body cam videos (included in the opinion) and it’s apparent defendant had a gun in his sweatshirt pocket. “Not every bulge is a weapon,” but this one apparently was. That justified the frisk. United … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Md.: Surveillance and bodycam video supported officer’s contention def had a firearm in sweatshirt pocket

NY3: Where no information anyone else could be inside, no justification for protective sweep after def’s arrest

The police had no information even suggesting that another person was in the premises, and a protective sweep after defendant was arrested was unjustified. People v. Hadlock, 2023 NY Slip Op 03819, 2023 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3839 (3d Dept. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Strip search | Comments Off on NY3: Where no information anyone else could be inside, no justification for protective sweep after def’s arrest

OH12: Protective sweeps didn’t require consent

The protective sweep didn’t require consent. Moreover, the argument wasn’t preserve below. State v. Mott, 2023-Ohio-2268 (12th Dist. July 3, 2023).* Based on the totality, it was objectively reasonable to believe defendant was speeding when the officer decided to stop … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Immigration arrests, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH12: Protective sweeps didn’t require consent

IN: Drug dog’s half sitting alert was still reliable

“In contrast, here the State established that Maverick was a certified drug sniffing dog with a history of reliability. Maverick’s behavior, even without a full final response of sitting, was sufficient to indicate that he had detected the odors of … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Drug dog’s half sitting alert was still reliable

NJ: Two-hour delayed SI for forensic evidence on def’s sweatshirt in axe murder case was reasonable

A two-hour delayed search incident of defendant’s sweatshirt for blood and other evidence was reasonable when he was in custody under U.S. v. Edwards (1974, 10 hours) and more compelling probable cause developed he committed an axe murder. Swabbing of … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Search incident | Comments Off on NJ: Two-hour delayed SI for forensic evidence on def’s sweatshirt in axe murder case was reasonable

N.D.Ala.: No REP in DEA’s license plate reader database

“First, Officer Josh Powers did not violate Toombs’ Fourth Amendment rights by accessing license plate reader data from the Department of Justice’s Drug Enforcement Administration System Information License (‘DEASIL’). Second, Powers had reasonable suspicion of criminal activity when he extended … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Protective sweep, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: No REP in DEA’s license plate reader database

TX: New crime in resisting illegal arrest doesn’t depend on gravity of the new offense

Appellant resisted an illegal patdown and was Tased and charged with obstruction and resisting. A new offense is an intervening circumstance under Brown, and it doesn’t matter whether it is “serious” or not. Massey v. State, 2023 Tex. Crim. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Informant hearsay, Protective sweep | Comments Off on TX: New crime in resisting illegal arrest doesn’t depend on gravity of the new offense

NC: Arrest warrant for def permitted entry into house when he retreated inside; protective sweep valid

Officers had an arrest warrant for defendant for a violent crime, and he was found at home. They saw him outside, and he retreated inside. The SRT showed up too. The entry for the arrest was valid, as was the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Protective sweep, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on NC: Arrest warrant for def permitted entry into house when he retreated inside; protective sweep valid

CA6: Entry onto driveway didn’t violate curtilage

Officers’ entry onto plaintiff’s driveway did not violate curtilage. Habich v. Wayne Cty., 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 8868 (6th Cir. Apr. 12, 2023). No reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of trash cans left at the curb for collection. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA6: Entry onto driveway didn’t violate curtilage

E.D.Mo.: Despite initial deception from officers, cell phone search was by consent

“Even when Sgt. Sublette’s initial deception is considered, the totality of the circumstances amount to voluntary consent by Carron. At the time of the encounter, Carron was a 44-year-old man who appeared to be reasonably intelligent with prior experience in … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Protective sweep, Voluntariness | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Despite initial deception from officers, cell phone search was by consent

E.D.Mo.: Officers don’t have to rely on occupants’ word that others aren’t present to be able to conduct a protective sweep

Officers don’t have to rely on occupants’ word that others aren’t present to be able to conduct a protective sweep. Apparent authority to consent and inevitable discovery also apply. United States v. Lewis, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30938 (E.D. Mo. … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Officers don’t have to rely on occupants’ word that others aren’t present to be able to conduct a protective sweep

W.D.N.Y.: Using flashlight to look in bag tossed in flight in a house was reasonable on protective sweep

Use of a flashlight in a protective sweep of a black bag tossed by a fleeing suspect in the house was reasonable for safety reasons. Inside, methamphetamine was found. United States v. Adams, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28537 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Using flashlight to look in bag tossed in flight in a house was reasonable on protective sweep

VA: Statute passed one year after search that smell couldn’t be basis didn’t apply retroactively

A statute passed a year after this search that the odor of marijuana was no longer probable cause didn’t apply retroactively here. It says “in violation of this statute,” so that’s prospective only. Loeper v. Commonwealth, 2023 Va. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: Statute passed one year after search that smell couldn’t be basis didn’t apply retroactively

CA6: Govt completely failed to show nexus or PC thus no GFE

The affidavits supporting the records warrant for defendant’s home did not establish nexus between his alleged drug activity, drug records, and his address. Also, the affidavit did not allege that defendant dealt drugs from the house or that he even … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Protective sweep, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA6: Govt completely failed to show nexus or PC thus no GFE