Category Archives: Protective sweep

D.Minn.: A “search and seizure warrant” not only authorized seizure of defendant’s computer but its search

A “search and seizure warrant” not only authorized seizure of defendant’s computer but its search. “Defendant’s argument that the search warrant authorized the seizure—but not the search—of his computer, phone, and computer storage media strains the bounds of logic and … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Protective sweep, Scope of search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Minn.: A “search and seizure warrant” not only authorized seizure of defendant’s computer but its search

D.N.M.: Govt’s failure to argue validity of scope of protective sweep before USMJ waived it

The government didn’t raise validity of the scope of the full protective sweep before the USMJ and waived it after the R&R. United States v. Salazar, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10212 (D. N.M. Jan. 23, 2018). Defendant’s cell phone search … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Govt’s failure to argue validity of scope of protective sweep before USMJ waived it

N.D.Ala.: The mere possibility others are on the premises isn’t RS for Buie

To justify a protective sweep, the mere possibility others might be on the premises is not reasonable suspicion under Buie and would essentially cause a protective sweep in every case. United States v. Yarbrough, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2883 (N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: The mere possibility others are on the premises isn’t RS for Buie

OR: CI privilege doesn’t require production of CI for in camera review if there is PC

While “Defendant does not challenge the trial court’s further determination that the affidavit contained sufficient information to establish the CI’s reliability and credibility,” he faults the trial court for not having the CI produced for in camera review. The identity … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Protective sweep | Comments Off on OR: CI privilege doesn’t require production of CI for in camera review if there is PC

MD: Michigan v. Long protective frisk of a car includes looking under floor mats

Defendant was driving in a high crime area and engaging in activity suggesting a drug transaction. When officer stopped his vehicle, he acted suspiciously and made furtive movements. The Michigan v. Long protective sweep of a car includes lifting the … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MD: Michigan v. Long protective frisk of a car includes looking under floor mats

CA10: Protective sweep conducted without RS others present; SW suppressed

Officers came to arrest defendant in his home. They conducted a protective sweep of the entire premises without reason to believe anyone else was present. Their plain views made it into a search warrant, and the search is suppressed. United … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA10: Protective sweep conducted without RS others present; SW suppressed

E.D.Wis.: Furtive movement toward car during stop justified protective frisk of car

Defendant’s furtive movements toward his car and his agitated state justified a protective frisk of the car. United States v. Vaccaro, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205804 (E.D. Wis. Sept. 18, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204625 (E.D. Wis. Dec. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Furtive movement toward car during stop justified protective frisk of car

TX2: No exigency shown for warrantless blood draw in DUI case

The state failed to prove exigent circumstances for a warrantless blood draw from the defendant. There were other officers around and a warrant could have been sought. State v. Sanders, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 11674 (Tex. App. – Ft. Worth … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on TX2: No exigency shown for warrantless blood draw in DUI case

E.D.La.: Drive-by shooting led to emergency ping order which led to valid protective sweep

“Defendant lacks standing to challenge the sweep of Ms. Wells’ home. At best, Defendant was a frequent visitor to the home where he babysat children and worked on cars in the yard. Those limited connections to the home are insufficient … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Drive-by shooting led to emergency ping order which led to valid protective sweep

D.P.R.: Threshold arrest of defendant in his underwear justifies a protective sweep

A threshold arrest of defendant in his underwear justifies a protective sweep because he’d have to get his clothes. United States v. Rodriguez-Madera, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 196636 (D. P.R. Nov. 28, 2017):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Threshold arrest of defendant in his underwear justifies a protective sweep

CA9: Long protective weapons search wasn’t justified by RS weapons could be found

“Although Officers Ellis and Prince may have reasonably believed that Perryman and his cousin, Anthony Perryman (“Anthony”), were dangerous, the evidence does not support the district court’s conclusion that the officers reasonably believed that Perryman or Anthony would gain immediate … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA9: Long protective weapons search wasn’t justified by RS weapons could be found

D.Me.: Officer’s comments and actions on body recorder belie any need for protective sweep

Officers went to defendant’s mobile home on a knock-and-talk based on an attempt to buy a gun two weeks earlier that was denied because the address given didn’t match the driver’s license. At the door of the mobile home, the … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.Me.: Officer’s comments and actions on body recorder belie any need for protective sweep