S.D.Cal.: Handcuffing DV detainee was reasonable, but search of his bag was without RS

Officers responding to a 911 call about alleged domestic violence in public handcuffed defendant. This was reasonable at the time. Reasonable suspicion for a search of the cross body bag on him was lacking. He was handcuffed, there was no inkling there was a weapon in there, but the officers were only interested in defendant’s criminal history and potential for drug use. United States v. Beltran, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176018 (S.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2025).

The officer’s failure to mention things he knew nothing about wasn’t a Franks violation. On the whole, there was probable cause for this anticipatory warrant. United States v. Vishnevski, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177145 (S.D. Ill. Sep. 10, 2025).*

Defendant failed in his burden of showing standing in the rental car that was searched he was only a passenger in. At any rate, the protective sweep of the car was reasonable. United States v. Jones, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176685 (E.D. Mo. Sep. 10, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.