CA5: Opening refrigerator here wasn’t justified by exigency during “sweep”

Opening a refrigerator wasn’t justified by any exigent circumstances in an entry to interview children about alleged abuse. McMurry v. Weaver, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15956 (5th Cir. June 27, 2025).

The dueling experts’ reports show a triable issue of excessive force. Grant of summary judgment reversed. A.B. v. Cty. of San Diego, 2025 Cal. App. LEXIS 399 (4th Dist. June 26, 2025).*

Plaintiff’s complaint the government used falsified information to get a search warrant was untimely filed. Faller v. DOJ, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15796 (6th Cir. June 25, 2025).*

2255 petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim for not filing a motion to suppress that would never be granted fails. United States v. Goodin, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122962 (W.D. La. June 27, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep, Qualified immunity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.