Author Archives: Hall

NY4: First search missed cache of drugs, so police came back for a second search; first search admissible at trial

Officers got a search warrant for defendant’s premises and searched. Two days later, they discovered through a source that they missed a cache of drugs in the house. They came back with another. The results of the first search were … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on NY4: First search missed cache of drugs, so police came back for a second search; first search admissible at trial

D.D.C.: Search of international letter in D.C. was valid as border search

Search of an international letter on arrival in D.C. was valid as a border search. United States v. Martin, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123023 (D.D.C. June 27, 2025).* There was reasonable suspicion for the officer’s encounter with defendant who was … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Mail and packages, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Search of international letter in D.C. was valid as border search

CA5: Opening refrigerator here wasn’t justified by exigency during “sweep”

Opening a refrigerator wasn’t justified by any exigent circumstances in an entry to interview children about alleged abuse. McMurry v. Weaver, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15956 (5th Cir. June 27, 2025). The dueling experts’ reports show a triable issue of … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Opening refrigerator here wasn’t justified by exigency during “sweep”

Reason: Using the National Guard in DEA Raids Is the Worst Kind of Drug War Mission Creep

Reason: Using the National Guard in DEA Raids Is the Worst Kind of Drug War Mission Creep by C.J. Ciaramella (“The Trump administration deployed National Guard soldiers to assist the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and other federal law enforcement agencies … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on Reason: Using the National Guard in DEA Raids Is the Worst Kind of Drug War Mission Creep

CA5: Spirit Aerosystems, Inc. v. Paxton revd

Spirit Aerosystems, Inc. v. Paxton, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219598 (W.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2024), posted here, rev’d 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15838 (5th Cir. June 26, 2025).

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on CA5: Spirit Aerosystems, Inc. v. Paxton revd

WA: Admin. search entry through employee entrance tailgating employee into building violated statute and was suppressed

“This appeal asks us to decide whether Department of Labor and Industries (DLI) inspectors possessed authority to tailgate a fitness club member through an otherwise locked door into the fitness club to ask for permission to inspect the business premises … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on WA: Admin. search entry through employee entrance tailgating employee into building violated statute and was suppressed

D.N.H.: Extended border search of men on bicycles was valid

Defendant was stopped on a bicycle with backpack and bedroll with another in New Hampshire by a CBP officer who suspected they’d illegally crossed the border. They admitted they had. Suspecting they were involved with human smugglers, the officers searched … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Extended border search of men on bicycles was valid

PA: Protective sweep doesn’t permit searching dresser drawers

The protective sweep was valid, but it did not permit going into dresser drawers. Commonwealth v. Hightower, 2025 PA Super 129, 2025 Pa. Super. LEXIS 277 (June 25, 2025); Commonwealth v. Layer, 2025 PA Super 128, 2025 Pa. Super. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Franks doctrine, Inventory, Protective sweep, Scope of search | Comments Off on PA: Protective sweep doesn’t permit searching dresser drawers

OH9: Parole search of house was valid even though def arrested outside

The parole search of defendant’s place was still valid even though he was arrested outside. State v. Robinson, 2025-Ohio-2216 (9th Dist. June 25, 2025). 2255 petitioner doesn’t show counsel was ineffective for not moving to suppress because a suppression motion … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on OH9: Parole search of house was valid even though def arrested outside

GA: Dog sniff during the first part of the stop while computer checks going on didn’t prolong it

“[T]he trial court was entitled to find that the questioning and free-air dog sniff were done concurrently with other tasks related to the mission of the traffic stop and therefore did not impermissibly prolong the stop.” Avant v. State, 2025 … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on GA: Dog sniff during the first part of the stop while computer checks going on didn’t prolong it

CA11: Knee on the neck of nonresisting suspect [who happened to be innocent] was excessive

Plaintiff was at the wrong place at the wrong time of a threatened robbery. He was taken from his car at gunpoint and an officer held him down with a knee to the neck nearly asphyxiating him. While no case … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Knee on the neck of nonresisting suspect [who happened to be innocent] was excessive

W.D.Tex.: Court won’t “second guess” 13 officers participating in vehicle stop and search

“Maybe thirteen officers were not needed. Maybe the officers did not need to carry and display rifles. Maybe fewer vehicles could have been used to block Defendant’s vehicle. Maybe officers did not have to place Defendant in handcuffs because their … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Court won’t “second guess” 13 officers participating in vehicle stop and search

CA6: No property interest shown in blood taken from all infants at birth

The state requiring the taking of some blood from newborn infants for testing and keeping it did not constitute a seizure because plaintiffs proved no property interest. Parental consent is required for any later use. Kanuszewski v. Mich. Dep’t of … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: No property interest shown in blood taken from all infants at birth

D.Kan.: Apt building parking lot not curtilage

The apartment building’s parking lot was not part of the curtilage. United States v. Isaac, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120584 (D. Kan. June 24, 2025). Defendant was wanted on a PV warrant. A warrant task force located a place he … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Apt building parking lot not curtilage

National Review: Washington State to Use Drivers’ Cell Phone Data to Enforce Traffic Laws

National Review: Washington State to Use Drivers’ Cell Phone Data to Enforce Traffic Laws by John R. Puri (but it just sounds like what Google collects for GPS traffic):

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on National Review: Washington State to Use Drivers’ Cell Phone Data to Enforce Traffic Laws

WaPo: Scanning technology is coming to detect child porn. Here’s what it means

WaPo: Scanning technology is coming to detect child porn. Here’s what it means by Shira Ovide:

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Digital privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: Scanning technology is coming to detect child porn. Here’s what it means

S.D.N.Y.: Search incident not invalid even though officer would have just issued citation for possession of MJ

Defendant was parked at an intersection in the Bronx and was consuming marijuana in the car on the street, a state offense. The officer had the authority to conduct a search of the car even though he was likely only … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Search incident not invalid even though officer would have just issued citation for possession of MJ

CA11: Using BitTorrent to enter def’s computer peer-to-peer wasn’t an unreasonable search

Using BitTorrent to access defendant’s open child pornography files peer-to-peer on his computer was not a digital trespass and did not violate any reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Ewing, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15437 (11th Cir. June 23, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Digital privacy, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Inventory, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Trespass | Comments Off on CA11: Using BitTorrent to enter def’s computer peer-to-peer wasn’t an unreasonable search

D.P.R.: Nexus to CSLI would show who had the phone to connect it to crime

Defendant had standing to contest a search of this cell phone. While he didn’t attach an affidavit, the motion and other papers say it’s his, as does the consent form. Nothing suggests it’s not. The police got a warrant out … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Nexus, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Nexus to CSLI would show who had the phone to connect it to crime

IA: Fanny pack handed off to another on arrest was subject to search incident

On being arrested, defendant removed his fanny pack and handed it to another. It was still subject to search incident. State v. Scullark, 2025 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 74 (June 20, 2025):

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on IA: Fanny pack handed off to another on arrest was subject to search incident