D.Kan.: Apt building parking lot not curtilage

The apartment building’s parking lot was not part of the curtilage. United States v. Isaac, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120584 (D. Kan. June 24, 2025).

Defendant was wanted on a PV warrant. A warrant task force located a place he might be and staked it out. They saw him go in, and they came to the door and found him. The protective sweep thereafter was reasonable. That led to a valid warrant. State v. Robinson, 2025-Ohio-2216 (9th Dist. June 25, 2025).*

The stop was reasonable because of a traffic offense, but officers also previously developed reasonable suspicion to believe the vehicle was involved in drug trafficking. United States v. Reiman, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119700 (D. Neb. May 5, 2025).*

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not pursuing a motion to suppress that would never have succeeded. Wilson v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119486 (W.D. Ky. June 24, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Curtilage, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.