CA6: No property interest shown in blood taken from all infants at birth

The state requiring the taking of some blood from newborn infants for testing and keeping it did not constitute a seizure because plaintiffs proved no property interest. Parental consent is required for any later use. Kanuszewski v. Mich. Dep’t of Health & Hum. Servs., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15685 (6th Cir. June 25, 2025), prior appeal 927 F.3d 396 (6th Cir. 2019), reversing 684 F. Supp. 3d 637 (E.D. Mich. 2023).

All things considered, defendant’s post prison release GPS requirement was reasonable. Commonwealth v. Streed, 2025 Mass. App. LEXIS 54 (June 26, 2025).*

Defendant’s Franks challenge fails. Nothing is shown to be misleading nor material. United States v. McGuire, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120946 (D. Haw. June 25, 2025).*

The motion to suppress is untimely and on the eve of trial. Denied. United States v. Glenn, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120690 (E.D. Tenn. June 25, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Body searches, Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Seizure, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.