Author Archives: Hall

S.D.Tex.: Compelling def to give up combination to safe during search violated 5A

Compelling defendant to give up the combination of a safe in his shared dwelling to search it under a warrant violated the Fifth Amendment. United States v. Villarreal-Resendiz, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174690 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 5, 2026):

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Compelling def to give up combination to safe during search violated 5A

CA5: Ptf’s forced drug test wasn’t justified by exigent circumstances

Plaintiff’s claim of being forced to do a drug test but not for protection of the children she cared for stated a claim and survived summary judgment. Knighton v. Benton Cty., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 23741 (5th Cir. Aug. 6, … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf’s forced drug test wasn’t justified by exigent circumstances

IN: Officers leaving car door open to facilitate drug dog entry into car violated 4A

During a traffic stop, officers left defendant’s car door open apparently so the drug dog would go in, and it did. This entry violated the Fourth Amendment. Boyd v. State, 2026 Ind. App. LEXIS 263 (Aug. 5, 2026). The inventory … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Dog sniff, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Officers leaving car door open to facilitate drug dog entry into car violated 4A

S.D.Tex.: A safe could be searched under a child porn SW

On a child pornography search warrant, search of a locked safe was reasonable. United States v. Villarreal-Resendiz, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174690 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 5, 2026). Stopping over the stop line was reasonable suspicion for this stop. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: A safe could be searched under a child porn SW

CA7: Smoking marijuana in public is still an arrestable offense; def’s backpack could be searched incident to it

Smoking marijuana in public is still an arrestable offense, and defendant’s backpack could be searched incident to it. United States v. Worku, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 23239 (7th Cir. Aug. 4, 2026).* Because the stop and frisk was reasonable, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search incident, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA7: Smoking marijuana in public is still an arrestable offense; def’s backpack could be searched incident to it

GA: Def in sex assault case has no standing to challenge alleged victim’s rape exam

“And here, it strains credulity for Young to claim that he has any standing to challenge the lawfulness of the victim’s sexual-assault examination.” Young v. State, 2026 Ga. App. LEXIS 401 (Aug. 5, 2026).* Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on GA: Def in sex assault case has no standing to challenge alleged victim’s rape exam

CA8: Lesser intrusive measures not required for jail strip search

Defendant was strip searched on going into jail, no matter what type of unit he was going to, and a baggie of meth was found under his genitals. The strip search was reasonable and the jail didn’t have to accommodate … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness, Strip search | Comments Off on CA8: Lesser intrusive measures not required for jail strip search

FL3: Frisk can occur immediately after stop

The stop was with reasonable suspicion, and the frisk can occur immediately. The trial court’s holding it couldn’t has no support in law. State v. Lyles, 2026 Fla. App. LEXIS 5911 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 5, 2026). The CI was … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on FL3: Frisk can occur immediately after stop

S.D.Ohio: Drug dog sticking head partially into open door area was at least with reasonable suspicion

“[W]here a dog only partially and briefly pokes their head into the interior of a vehicle, as Cody did here, such does not constitute a search. Fellmy, 165 F.4th at 506 (citing Caballes, 543 U.S. at 408-09) (finding a dog … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Drug dog sticking head partially into open door area was at least with reasonable suspicion

D.Me.: Failure of drug dog to alert is a factor in totality

The failure of the drug dog to alert doesn’t completely undermine probable case, but it is a factor in the totality of circumstances. Here, the government didn’t meet its burden. United States v. Presby, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172828 (D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Me.: Failure of drug dog to alert is a factor in totality

M.D.Fla.: Package covered by anticipatory warrant was moved to another house, and exigency permitted warrantless entry to seize

In this anticipatory warrant case, the package was delivered to the target residence but then moved to another residence. That created exigent circumstances for entry without a warrant. Officers also did a protective sweep and retreated to get a search … Continue reading →

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Package covered by anticipatory warrant was moved to another house, and exigency permitted warrantless entry to seize

E.D.N.Y.: SW request to search cell phone seized two months earlier was unreasonable

“The government seeks a warrant to search two cellular phones that have been in its possession for more than two months since the time to execute a prior search warrant lapsed. In United States v. Smith, 967 F.3d 198 (2d … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: SW request to search cell phone seized two months earlier was unreasonable

IN Tax: 4A claim over order to enter for tax assessment moot where it didn’t happen

There was an order to enter the taxpayer’s property for an assessment; however, the entry never occurred, so the Fourth Amendment issue is moot. Bolte v. Dubois Cty. Assessor, 2026 Ind. Tax LEXIS 35 (T.C. Aug. 3, 2026). “The record … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Mootness, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN Tax: 4A claim over order to enter for tax assessment moot where it didn’t happen

Reason: Kansas Lawsuit: ALPRs Turn a License Plate Into the ‘Functional Equivalent’ of a ‘GPS Tracking Device’

Reason: Kansas Lawsuit: ALPRs Turn a License Plate Into the ‘Functional Equivalent’ of a ‘GPS Tracking Device’ by Jacob Sullum (“The Kansas Justice Institute argues that Wichita’s ‘warrantless ALPR dragnet surveillance program’ violates the state constitution’s privacy protections.”).

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on Reason: Kansas Lawsuit: ALPRs Turn a License Plate Into the ‘Functional Equivalent’ of a ‘GPS Tracking Device’

MI: Suppression hearing is a critical stage of the proceedings

A suppression hearing is a critical stage of the proceedings, and defendant was unrepresented at that point due to disagreements with first retained and then appointed counsel. Remanded. The pretrial motions in general were disorganized, and the Fourth Amendment claim … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Privileges, Qualified immunity, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on MI: Suppression hearing is a critical stage of the proceedings

S.D.W.Va.: Admission to a little marijuana in backpack didn’t justify search of her car trunk

Defendant’s admission to the officers she had a little marijuana in her backpack didn’t justify a search of the trunk. United States v. Bowling, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169576 (S.D. W. Va. July 30, 2026). Plaintiff’s § 1983 false arrest … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Admission to a little marijuana in backpack didn’t justify search of her car trunk

CA7: Controlled buy justified stop, dog sniff, and search

The controlled buy off defendant gave probable cause to search his car after he left it, irrespective of an alleged pretextual traffic stop and use of a drug dog. United States v. Randle, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 22657 (7th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Privileges, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA7: Controlled buy justified stop, dog sniff, and search

WaPo: How rogue officers turned a nationwide camera network into a tool for stalking

WaPo: How rogue officers turned a nationwide camera network into a tool for stalking by Drew Harwell, Douglas MacMillan and Aaron Schaffer (“Flock’s array of license-plate cameras was built to fight crime. But at least 50 law enforcement officers were … Continue reading →

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on WaPo: How rogue officers turned a nationwide camera network into a tool for stalking

Cal.1: Search condition for mental health diversion was within court’s discretion

The trial court acted within its statutory discretion imposing a search condition on defendant during his mental health diversion. His criminal history justified it. Thompson v. Superior Court, 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 459 (1st Dist. July 30, 2026). One defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on Cal.1: Search condition for mental health diversion was within court’s discretion

OH1: Even with MJ use being legal, driving under influence isn’t

While small amounts of marijuana are legal in Ohio, driving under the influence is not, so the smell of burnt marijuana in a vehicle is probable cause. Also, a blunt was seen in the ashtray. State v. Sawyer, 2026-Ohio-2913 (1st … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH1: Even with MJ use being legal, driving under influence isn’t