IN: Officers leaving car door open to facilitate drug dog entry into car violated 4A

During a traffic stop, officers left defendant’s car door open apparently so the drug dog would go in, and it did. This entry violated the Fourth Amendment. Boyd v. State, 2026 Ind. App. LEXIS 263 (Aug. 5, 2026).

The inventory of defendant’s rented vehicle was within policy and valid. State v. Haywood, 2026 Ohio App. LEXIS 2905 (1st Dist. Aug. 5, 2026).*

Defendant was walking and seen likely with a gun on him, and officers approached. He fled, jumping a fence, but he was finally captured in a backyard. Officers found the hidden gun and one round in his pocket. He was not seized when he abandoned the gun. Hatcherson-Ross v. United States, 2026 D.C. App. LEXIS 265 (Aug. 6, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Abandonment, Dog sniff, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.