FL3: Frisk can occur immediately after stop

The stop was with reasonable suspicion, and the frisk can occur immediately. The trial court’s holding it couldn’t has no support in law. State v. Lyles, 2026 Fla. App. LEXIS 5911 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 5, 2026).

The CI was not known to the affiant officer, but he was to the officer providing the information to the affiant. There was probable cause for the cell phone warrant. United States v. Gray, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171016 (E.D. Cal. July 31, 2026).*

“The search of defendant’s vehicle was permissible under the automobile exception to the warrant requirement for the suspected offense of operating a vehicle while under the influence where defendant admitted to smoking marijuana about one hour prior to driving, a bag of marijuana was discovered on his person, and defendant was speeding, and where the arresting officer testified that defendant had bloodshot eyes and slowed speech.” State v. Martin, 2026-Ohio-2959 (1st Dist. July 31, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.