CA8: Lesser intrusive measures not required for jail strip search

Defendant was strip searched on going into jail, no matter what type of unit he was going to, and a baggie of meth was found under his genitals. The strip search was reasonable and the jail didn’t have to accommodate ways to avoid the strip search. United States v. Sutton, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 23367 (8th Cir. Aug. 5, 2026).

Firearm possession in the home doesn’t readily become stale, and “staleness is a context-specific inquiry.” Even if probable cause was lacking, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Hernandez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171613 (N.D. Iowa Aug. 3, 2026).*

The record supports the conclusion the consent was voluntary on the totality. The defense said it was coerced. No evidence of that. State v. Wilkins, 2026-Ohio-2971 (4th Dist. July 21, 2026).*

This traffic stop was for not pulling far enough off the road, and was valid. United States v. Underwood, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 23125 (10th Cir. Aug. 3, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness, Strip search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.