Category Archives: Mootness

S.D.N.Y.: Govt declines to use challenged evidence so it’s moot; def can reassert if need be

The government says it doesn’t intend to use challenged evidence, so the motion to suppress is moot. If the government changes its mind, defendant can reassert it. United States v. Combs, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25641 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 12, 2025).* … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Mootness, Waiver | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Govt declines to use challenged evidence so it’s moot; def can reassert if need be

D.Kan.: Preliminary hearing moots claim of lack of PC for arrest

If an arrest lacks probable cause, the preliminary hearing can moot that. Taylor v. Szewc, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57791 (D. Kan. Mar. 29, 2024). Omitted information about the CI doesn’t support this Franks challenge. United States v. Williams, 2024 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Mootness, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Preliminary hearing moots claim of lack of PC for arrest

W.D.Ark.: Parole search waiver moots lack of PC argument

Defendant was subject to a state warrantless parole search waiver, so the existence of probable cause to support the warrant is moot. United States v. Strickland, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73938 (W.D. Ark. Apr. 23, 2024).* “Camara argues that the … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay, Mootness, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Parole search waiver moots lack of PC argument

NY1: Where seized evidence wasn’t used at trial, it’s moot

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment argument on appeal is moot. The evidence he complains was wrongly seized wasn’t used at trial. People v. Gordon, 2022 NY Slip Op 00055, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 63 (1st Dept. Jan. 6, 2022). The omitted … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Mootness, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY1: Where seized evidence wasn’t used at trial, it’s moot