W.D.N.Y.: Skeletal motion to suppress denied on its face

Skeletal motion to suppress without facts or law denied. United States v. Matar, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141206 (W.D.N.Y. June 25, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Skeletal motion to suppress denied on its face

CA8: A state police officer, a part of a federal task force, could lie to cause an arrest to protect a federal witness

“We have decided this question before: ‘whether a St. Paul police officer acted under color of state law when she allegedly lied to protect a federal witness while serving on a federal task force.’ Yassin v. Weyker, 39 F.4th 1086, 1087 (8th Cir. 2022). Our answer, once again, is she did not. See id.” Mohamud v. Weyker, No. 24-1875 (8th Cir. July 23, 2025).*

The Aurora housing inspection code is not unconstitutional on its face for attempting inspections. If they’re refused, the city has to seek other remedies, which could include inspection warrants. DPH Aurora Props., LLC v. City of Aurora, 2025 IL App (2d) 240540 (July 22, 2025).

A negligent failure to train claim under § 1983 doesn’t state a Fourth Amendment claim because intentional acts are required. Kristiansen v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139782 (D. Or. July 22, 2025).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA8: A state police officer, a part of a federal task force, could lie to cause an arrest to protect a federal witness

OH6: Refusing consent to search cell phone can’t be sentencing aggravator

Defendant had a constitutional right to refuse consent to search his cell phone, and the trial court erred by considering that as an aggravating factor in sentencing. State v. Dawes, 2025-Ohio-2576, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 2500 (6th Dist. July 22, 2025).

Plaintiff’s claim that he was arrested without probable cause doesn’t fly here. There clearly was arguable probable cause. Urda v. Sokso, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 18107 (3d Cir. July 22, 2025).*

There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop when the officer approached him and he fled. United States v. Richardson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139158 (E.D. Va. July 21, 2025).*

Defendant doesn’t show a reason for the court to adopt a different standard for reasonable suspicion under the state constitution. There was reasonable suspicion here. Copado v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 5208 (Tex. App. – Dallas July 22, 2025).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Consent, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OH6: Refusing consent to search cell phone can’t be sentencing aggravator

WaPo: DNA obtained by ruse by TSA

WaPo: Interrogating a cold-case killer: ‘Honey, your DNA was in the crime scene’ (“Police videos show Eugene Gligor being arrested and questioned for the 2001 murder of Leslie Preer in Chevy Chase, Md.”) His DNA was captured at Dulles Airport in a ruse secondary screening.

Posted in Airport searches | Comments Off on WaPo: DNA obtained by ruse by TSA

VA: Collective knowledge between state and federal officers for arrest

There was probable cause by collective knowledge for defendant’s arrest at Dulles airport where Virginia police asked Homeland Security to make the arrest. Lewis v. Commonwealth, 2025 Va. App. LEXIS 412 (July 22, 2025) (unpublished).*

Appellant’s Fourth Amendment claim was waived in a prior appeal so it can’t be raised in a second appeal under the appellate forfeiture doctrine. United States v. Storck, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17961 (6th Cir. July 17, 2025).*

In a convoluted case, a liquor enforcement inspection warrant was executed during a business rush, allegedly in retaliation for asking for a warrant. Also, it appears the scope of the warrant exceeds the agency’s authority over liquor control. This part of the motion to dismiss is denied pending discovery which can help clear things up. Generis Ent., LLC v. Donley, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138226 (E.D. Mich. July 8, 2025).*

Posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Collective knowledge, Waiver | Comments Off on VA: Collective knowledge between state and federal officers for arrest

TX4: Reformed affidavit in Franks challenge still had PC

Assuming defendant’s Franks argument was valid, he got a hearing, a paragraph of the affidavit was deleted, and probable cause still remained. Affirmed. Del Toro v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 5255 (Tex. App. – San Antonio July 23, 2025).*

Motion for new trial based on alleged Franks violation that didn’t even say what the false statements were was properly denied. State v. Coleman, 2025-Ohio-2581 (9th Dist. July 23, 2025).*

There was probable cause for location information on defendant’s cell phones because the police had information he used them during a shooting incident where his car was also shot at. United States v. Reeves, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17665 (8th Cir. July 17, 2025).*

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on TX4: Reformed affidavit in Franks challenge still had PC

OH9: Grant of motion to suppress off bodycam video reversed, officer’s testimony not inconsistent

The granting of the motion to suppress is reversed as not based on competent or credible evidence. The bodycam doesn’t fully support the officer’s testimony there were furtive movements before he got up to the driver’s window, but the bodycam image is partly obscured by reflected light. [Actually, the bodycam doesn’t make the officer’s testimony false.] State v. Leneo, 2025-Ohio-2582 (9th Dist. July 23, 2025).*

Failure to investigate a legally meritless search and seizure claim isn’t ineffective assistance of counsel. People v. Miller, 2025 Mich. App. LEXIS 5735 (July 18, 2025).*

Defendant kind of got a Franks hearing within a motion to suppress hearing, and there’s no substantial preliminary showing of knowing or reckless falsity. Denied. United States v. Stewart, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138688 (E.D. Mo. July 21, 2025).*

Posted in Body cameras, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH9: Grant of motion to suppress off bodycam video reversed, officer’s testimony not inconsistent

Law Review: Encryption Backdoors and the Fourth Amendment

Robert M. White, Encryption Backdoors and the Fourth Amendment, 108 Marq. L. Rev. 465 (2024). Abstract:

Continue reading
Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Law Review: Encryption Backdoors and the Fourth Amendment

D.C.Cir.: Officer saying he had “warrants” required remand for whether consent was mere acquiescence

The district court erred in not considering whether defendant acquiesced in consenting to a search. The officer said he had “warrants,” but there was no clarification whether it was an arrest warrant or search warrant. Reversed. United States v. Glover, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 18091 (D.C. Cir. July 22, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Consent, Voluntariness | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Officer saying he had “warrants” required remand for whether consent was mere acquiescence

CA9: Untimely post-trial motion to suppress not even considered on appeal

“Ellis also argues that the police officers’ search of his rental car resulted from an unconstitutionally prolonged traffic stop and was unsupported by probable cause. He pressed this claim in a post-trial motion that was untimely under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b)(3)(C) and failed to make an argument for good cause, as required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(c)(3). Thus, we decline to review this claim.” United States v. Ellis, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 18020 (9th Cir. July 21, 2025).*

There was reasonable suspicion to continue the stop. “The suspicion here arises from the combination of the travel plans, the story, and the time spent in Atalanta. Detective Anderson was rightfully skeptical that a father would fly to help his adult son move ‘a couple of boxes,’ stay for a few hours, and then drive back through the night. The reason Crayton gave for driving back was that his son was supposed to come back with them. To Detective Anderson, that did not adequately explain away his suspicions. It does not do so for the Court, either.” United States v. Crayton, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138102 (N.D. Ind. July 18, 2025).*

The government showed nexus in the warrant affidavit for drugs in defendant’s house. United States v. Swain, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138413 (N.D. Ohio July 21, 2025).*

Posted in Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA9: Untimely post-trial motion to suppress not even considered on appeal

N.D.Ohio: Abandonment in flight from arrest under alleged illegal warrant still abandonment

Fleeing an arrest under what is now alleged to be an invalid warrant and abandoning property is still abandonment. United States v. Pool, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138465 (N.D. Ohio July 21, 2025).

There was probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest despite the fact the state dismissed the case. A Tenth Circuit case that the police should have viewed a video before the arrest is only dictum. Also, “Alberty’s brief gives no more than perfunctory treatment to a claim of unreasonable search and seizure. Issues not sufficiently argued in briefs are considered abandoned.” In re Trip, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 18009 (2d Cir. July 21, 2025).*

There was cause for defendant’s stop but it was extended without reasonable suspicion. Motion to suppress granted. People v. Mendiola, 2025 Guam Trial Order LEXIS 140 (Super. Ct. July 7, 2025).*

Posted in Abandonment, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Abandonment in flight from arrest under alleged illegal warrant still abandonment

WA: Probation searches don’t violate WA Const.

Probation searches are a codified exception to the warrant requirement and not in violation of the Washington constitution. State v. Smith, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 1418 (July 21, 2025).

Leaving defendant’s vehicle on a parking lot potentially for days was not a reasonable alternative, and the towing and inventory were within department standards. United States v. Scott, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138755 (M.D. Ala. May 30, 2025),*

“So regardless of whether Defendant Richards actually engaged in a ‘turn’ or a ‘movement,’ Officer Reetz cannot be deemed under the circumstances to have violated the Fourth Amendment by reasonably (even if erroneously) concluding that both a signal and immediate egress into the nearest lane were required under the controlling law and facts. See Heien, 574 U.S. at 60 (“The question here is whether reasonable suspicion can rest on a mistaken understanding of the scope of a legal prohibition. We hold that it can.”); see also Scott, 693 F. App’x at 837-38 (same).” United States v. Richards, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138759 (M.D. Ala. June 19, 2025).*

Posted in Inventory, Reasonableness, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: Probation searches don’t violate WA Const.

Louisville Courier Journal: Ex-LMPD detective Brett Hankison sentenced to 33 months in prison

Louisville Courier Journal: Ex-LMPD detective Brett Hankison sentenced to 33 months in prison by Josh Wood (“A federal judge sentenced former Louisville Police detective Brett Hankison to 33 months in prison for the shots he fired during the fatal 2020 raid on Breonna Taylor’s apartment. The July 21 sentence was in defiance to a last-minute request from federal prosecutors that Hankison receive only a one-day sentence.” The offense was based at least in part on a Fourth Amendment violation with the government arguing that reasonable minds could disagree.

Posted in Excessive force, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Louisville Courier Journal: Ex-LMPD detective Brett Hankison sentenced to 33 months in prison

GA: 404(b) adult porn seized in CP case more prejudicial than relevant

Not strictly a Fourth Amendment case, but interesting: Defendant’s place in a child molestation case was searched and adult porn was seized. The porn was admitted over objection as 404(b) evidence, and it was prejudicial and completely inadmissible because it had no bearing on the case. Collum v. State, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 323 (June 27, 2025).*

Defendant’s Franks challenge of omitted exculpatory information was conclusory. State v. Ewing, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 83 (July 17, 2025).*

Plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the outdoor common area of her apartment complex. Alicea v. City of Bridgeport, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17681 (2d Cir. July 17, 2025).*

2255 petitioner’s counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress because of a lack of standing. Mays v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137535 (W.D. Tenn. July 18, 2025).*

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on GA: 404(b) adult porn seized in CP case more prejudicial than relevant

D.Mass.: Being a longtime member of a group that shared CP supported PC for defendant’s devices

“Given the length of Estrada’s membership in the two groups, the volume of files depicting child pornography shared during Estrada’s membership, and the detailed description of a file shared while Estrada was a participant in one of the groups, the magistrate judge had a substantial basis to find probable cause.” United States v. Ramirez, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135907 (D. Mass. July 16, 2025).*

On the body camera video and the papers in the motion for summary judgment, the officers had reasonable suspicion for detaining plaintiff. Burlow v. City of Detroit, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134529 (E.D. Mich. July 15, 2025).*

Aside from the fact defendant’s guilty plea waived all his pretrial motions, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not pursuing a motion to suppress that couldn’t prevail. United States v. Valentino, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136196 (D. Minn. July 17, 2025).*

Posted in Body cameras, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Being a longtime member of a group that shared CP supported PC for defendant’s devices

C.D.Cal. denies stay in immigration stops without RS

Perdomo v. Noem, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137993 (C.D. Cal. July 17, 2025), posted here, holds that reasonable suspicion is required for immigration stops and race alone isn’t enough. The government’s motion for stay pending appeal is denied.

Without more testimony about the intersection, the court finds the officer’s testimony about a rolling stop violating the law was conclusory and rejected. Plus, lack of testimony that the dog was reliable makes its sniff unreliable. People v. Jie Lin, 2025 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 6080 (Richmond Co. July 3, 2025).* [This is an outlier and won’t be in the book.]

Defendant litigated his search claim in the trial court and lost. He can’t say he proceeded to trial in violation of the Fourth Amendment. [That’s a new claim I’ve never heard before.] Singleton v. Dir., Tex. Dep’t of Crim. Just.-Corr. Insts. Div., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134608 (E.D. Tex. June 11, 2025).*

Posted in Dog sniff, Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal. denies stay in immigration stops without RS

Cleveland.com: Did Cleveland police cut corners when they used AI to recover a suspected murder weapon? Appeals court to decide

Cleveland PD used AI for facial recognition to get probable cause for a search warrant. Cleveland.com: Did Cleveland police cut corners when they used AI to recover a suspected murder weapon? Appeals court to decide. Oral argument August 22. Since the threshold for probable cause is so low, I suspect this will come out against the accused. AI can’t be used as trial evidence to convict, but it might be usable for a search warrant. Note: I’ve had use of AI in my discovery motions for over two years.

Posted in Facial recognition | Comments Off on Cleveland.com: Did Cleveland police cut corners when they used AI to recover a suspected murder weapon? Appeals court to decide

DC: Flight even in a high crime area isn’t RS

Relying on the en banc opinion in Mayo v. United States, 315 A.3d 606 (D.C. 2024), flight in a high-crime area is not reasonable suspicion. People flee to avoid unnecessary confrontation with the police, who just might be potentially too aggressive. D.W. v. United States, 2025 D.C. App. LEXIS 198 (July 17, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DC: Flight even in a high crime area isn’t RS

CA7: Lifting mattress during protective sweep here wasn’t justified

The protective sweep under a mattress here was unjustified. Protective sweeps have to be based on known facts, not theories. Here, without deciding whether it was justified, on this record, lifting a mattress was unreasonable. There was no reason to believe anyone could be hiding under it. United States v. Walker, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17763 (7th Cir. July 17, 2025).

The video doesn’t discredit the officer sufficiently to undermine the trial court’s findings of reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop. State v. Mangen, 2025 Minn. App. LEXIS 227 (July 14, 2025).*

2255 petitioner litigated his suppression motion on the merits before trial and he doesn’t get to do it again. Conley v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133810 (D. Md. July 11, 2025).*

Officers had an arrest warrant for defendant, and that authorized entry of the third party’s premises, something he doesn’t even acknowledge in his 2255 petition. Therefore, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective. United States v. Lee, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134683 (E.D. Va. July 15, 2025).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Lifting mattress during protective sweep here wasn’t justified

TX7: SW sworn to before wrong officer still in GF

The search warrant affidavit was not sworn to before a judge as required by the statute, but it was sworn to before an officer with the authority to take oaths. That was sufficient for the good faith exception to apply. Suppression reversed. State v. Rios, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 5080 (Tex. App. – Amarillo July 17, 2025).

In this federal homicide case with cell phone tracking, any motion to suppress would have failed, so defense counsel couldn’t be ineffective for not pursuing it. United States v. Brown, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134356 (N.D. Ill. July 15, 2025).*

Plaintiff’s complaint that officers falsified information for the search warrant that led to his case fails in § 1915A screening. He doesn’t allege what’s false or what was seized based on the falsity. Parker v. McMullum, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134360 (W.D. Okla. June 10, 2025).*

As a whole, the affidavit for warrant wasn’t materially misleading, and it still showed probable cause. United States v. Ramirez, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135907 (D. Mass. July 16, 2025).*

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on TX7: SW sworn to before wrong officer still in GF