The sixth edition of this book is at the publisher

The manuscript is in (all 7,500 single spaced pages), and the sixth edition of this book is at the publisher. Publication in December.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The sixth edition of this book is at the publisher

S.Ct. Shadow Docket Database

Supreme Court Shadow Docket Database added, not that any Fourth Amendment cases ever end up there.

Update: Wrong.

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on S.Ct. Shadow Docket Database

C.D.Cal.: Roving immigration patrol stops without RS violate 4A

“Roving patrols without reasonable suspicion violate the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution and denying access to lawyers violates the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. What the federal government would have this Court believe—in the face of a mountain of evidence presented in this case—is that none of this is actually happening.” Perdomo v. Noem, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134409 (C.D. Cal. July 11, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Roving immigration patrol stops without RS violate 4A

NYLJ: ‘This Is Not Science Fiction’: Trump Administration Uses Peter Thiel’s ‘Planantir’ Surveillance Technology to Spy on Americans

NYLJ: ‘This Is Not Science Fiction’: Trump Administration Uses Peter Thiel’s ‘Planantir’ Surveillance Technology to Spy on Americans by Bennett L. Gershman:

Continue reading
Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYLJ: ‘This Is Not Science Fiction’: Trump Administration Uses Peter Thiel’s ‘Planantir’ Surveillance Technology to Spy on Americans

E.D.La.: Use of translation app to communicate with def slowed the stop, but didn’t make it unreasonable

The officer’s use of a translation app on his cell phone to communicate with defendant didn’t unreasonably extend the stop. If limited questions can be asked, then logically an app can translate. Here, cell coverage was limited so that slowed the stop. United States v. Salvador, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133082 (E.D. La. July 14, 2025).

The Fourth Amendment does not apply to boarding and searching boats in international waters occupied by non-citizens. United States v. Winiewski, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132912 (M.D. Fla. July 14, 2025).

The trial court didn’t err in finding that the person who consented to the entry had apparent authority. State v. Hayes, 2025-Ohio-2483 (3d Dist. July 14, 2025).*

The affidavit was not so lacking in probable cause that there was no good faith basis for believing there was. United States v. Melvin, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17290 (3d Cir. July 14, 2025).*

Posted in Apparent authority, Foreign searches, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Use of translation app to communicate with def slowed the stop, but didn’t make it unreasonable

CA11: Ptf’s four arrests didn’t lack PC

Plaintiff was arrested four times in nine months, but he doesn’t plausibly allege that the arrests lacked probable cause. Hernandez v. Sheriff of Manatee Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17342 (11th Cir. July 14, 2025)*:

Continue reading
Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA11: Ptf’s four arrests didn’t lack PC

M.D.Fla.: Def had standing in his father’s home as a regular occasional guest with a key

The property searched was defendant’s father’s but he occasionally stayed there and had a key. On the day in question, police saw him going in. While he has standing, he loses on the merits of probable cause for the search and the good faith exception. United States v. Perkins, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132915 (M.D. Fla. July 14, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Def had standing in his father’s home as a regular occasional guest with a key

N.D.Ind.: 4A IAC shown by 2255 petitioner; arrest lacked all probable cause

2255 petitioner prevails on a Fourth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claim. There clearly was no probable cause for defendant’s arrest and car search. United States v. Henry, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133252 (N.D. Ind. July 10, 2025).*

The government says it’s not going to use the product of the search warrant at trial, so the question is moot. United States v. Banyan, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133410 (S.D.N.Y. July 14, 2025).*

There was a reasonable inference that stolen property would be found on defendant’s property after he was seen driving a stolen UTV. State v. Barton, 2025 Ore. App. LEXIS 1181 (July 9, 2025).*

Appellate counsel wasn’t ineffective for not appealing the denials of suppression motions because none of them would have prevailed. Hill v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133300 (E.D. Mo. July 14, 2025).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: 4A IAC shown by 2255 petitioner; arrest lacked all probable cause

S.D.N.Y.: Abandoning three large dogs to flee is more than just “mere refusal to cooperate”

“At the very least, leaving three large dogs effectively unrestrained in a public place to flee from law enforcement certainly amounts to more than the ‘mere refusal to cooperate’ that is protected by the Fourth Amendment. Cf. [Wardlow, 528 U.S. at 125].” United States v. Boone, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133655 (S.D.N.Y. July 14, 2025).

The affidavit for warrant was not so lacking in its showing of probable cause that the good faith exception would not apply. United States v. Melvin, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17290 (3d Cir. July 14, 2025).*

“The caselaw makes clear that weaving within a lane of traffic, by itself, may provide the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify a traffic stop.” There was cause for this stop. State v. Mangen, 2025 Minn. App. LEXIS 227 (Ct. App. July 14, 2025).*

“The warrant’s authorization to review all contents of the phone ‘in order to locate evidence, fruits, and instrumentalities of the Subject Crimes’ was not overbroad or insufficiently particular where the warrant included a detailed and particularized list of the information to be seized.” People v. Morris, 2025 NY Slip Op 03261, 2025 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4201 (1st Dept. July 14, 2025).*

Posted in Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Abandoning three large dogs to flee is more than just “mere refusal to cooperate”

D.Wyo.: SW’s catch-all phrase was still limited to drugs

“The warrant in this case has a catch-all phrase as to the types of evidence to be searched but is affirmatively limited to evidence of drug trafficking, manufacture, delivery, and possession. The warrant therefore satisfies the requirement described in cases such as Riccardi that ‘warrants for computer searches must affirmatively limit the search to evidence of specific federal crimes or specific types of material.’” United States v. Barnes, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132599 (D. Wyo. June 24, 2025).

On the whole, there was a substantial basis for issuance of this search warrant. “Further, it was objectively reasonable for the officers to rely on the probable cause opinion made by an assistant prosecuting attorney who reviewed the warrant and the probable cause determination made by the judge who issued the warrant.” United States v. Mangol, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131769 (W.D. Mo. May 23, 2025).*

There was collective knowledge supporting defendant’s arrest. United States v. Badillo-Hernández, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132593 (D.P.R. July 10, 2025).*

Fleeing a wrecked car and leaving cell phones behind is abandonment. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging it. State v. Sawyer, 319 Neb. 435 (July 11, 2025).

Posted in Abandonment, Collective knowledge, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Wyo.: SW’s catch-all phrase was still limited to drugs

W.D.Mo.: Unidentified tipster corroborated by hand-to-hand transactions

The unidentified tipster was corroborated by defendant’s hand-to-hand transactions during surveillance, and that was probable cause. United States v. Mangol, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130023 (W.D. Mo. May 23, 2025).

Defendant sought to use the GPS information on his trailer to prove that he wasn’t speeding when the officer said radar showed him going over the speed limit. The GPS information is too muddled to make sense. It measures in 21 second increments. Is it average speed, top speed? Can’t tell. United States v. Aguero, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132167 (W.D. Okla. July 11, 2025).*

On the totality, after a brief conversation, defendant consented to this search. “The whole encounter between the agents and Defendant lasted approximately 10 minutes. During their interaction with Defendant, the agents wore plain clothes, did not display any weapons, did not raise their voices, did not threaten Defendant, and did not handcuff or otherwise restrain Defendant. Nor did any of the agents physically touch Defendant before he was arrested. Moreover, Agent Bernecker noted that Defendant was very calm, relaxed, and cooperative during his interaction with the agents.” United States v. Stevenson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131842 (E.D. Ky. July 11, 2025).*

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Voluntariness | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Unidentified tipster corroborated by hand-to-hand transactions

S.D.Ill.: Being a cash courier doesn’t establish standing

Giving a substantial amount of cash to a courier to take it from Arizona to Maryland doesn’t create standing. United States v. $549,860.00 in United States Currency, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131436 (S.D. Ill. July 10, 2025).

Defendant’s place was raided in an anticipatory warrant and he first said that both cell phones there were his. Later, he said it was the shock of the arrest and only the iPhone was his. This became abandonment of the other phone. United States v. Morgan, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17218 (11th Cir. July 11, 2025).*

The use of deadly force here was apparently justified by the video, and it all happened in seconds. The officers violated no constitutional right, so the question of whether it was clearly established doesn’t have to be decided. Heid v. Rutkoski, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17090 (11th Cir. July 10, 2025).*

Plaintiff’s claim that surveillance of him was “illegal,” without more doesn’t state a claim. Jabr v. Dep’t of Taxation, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132236 (S.D. Ohio July 11, 2025).*

Posted in Abandonment, Anticipatory warrant, Burden of pleading, Excessive force, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Being a cash courier doesn’t establish standing

CA11: RS required for a prison visitor’s strip search; out of circuit authority can be considered in whether the law is clearly established

Reasonable suspicion is required for a prison visitor’s strip search. Out of circuit authority can be considered in whether the law is clearly established. Here it essentially was. Gilmore v. Ga. Dept. of Corr., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17209 (11th Cir. July 11, 2025), panel opinion Gilmore v. Ga. Dept. of Corr., 111 F.4th 1118 (11th Cir. 2024):

Continue reading
Posted in Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on CA11: RS required for a prison visitor’s strip search; out of circuit authority can be considered in whether the law is clearly established

Mediate: Trump’s Border Czar Sparks Firestorm of Anger By Telling Fox News ICE Can Detain Based on ‘Physical Appearance’

Mediate: Trump’s Border Czar Sparks Firestorm of Anger By Telling Fox News ICE Can Detain Based on ‘Physical Appearance’ by Alex Griffing

Posted in Racial profiling | Comments Off on Mediate: Trump’s Border Czar Sparks Firestorm of Anger By Telling Fox News ICE Can Detain Based on ‘Physical Appearance’

The Scopes trial was 100 years ago today

LA Times: When Darrow took on Bryan 100 years ago today, science got the win. Or did it? by Randall Balmer

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Scopes trial was 100 years ago today

N.D.Ga.: No REP in a prison inmate’s cell phone

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the use of a cell phone in prison. United States v. Brandt, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129412 (N.D. Ga. June 13, 2025).

This line in defendant’s PSR leads to denial of his motion to shorten supervised release. “Fausnaught confronted a source of information that led to the 1995 search warrant, calling him a ‘snitch’, remarking that ‘snitches get stitches,’ and threatening to have the source killed.” United States v. Fausnaught, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130416 (M.D. Pa. July 9, 2025).*

The trial court is to compare the credibility of the officer’s testimony against the video which did not happen here. State v. Thompson, 2025-Ohio-2427 (5th Dist. July 8, 2025).*

The fact the officer could have attempted to resolve the discrepancy of the VIN not matching the license plate a different way doesn’t mean the officer acted unreasonably, quoting United States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675, 686-87 (1985) (“[T]he question is not simply whether some other alternative was available, but whether the police acted unreasonably in failing to recognize or to pursue it”). United States v. Barrow, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 16896 (5th Cir. July 9, 2025).*

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness, Standards of review | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: No REP in a prison inmate’s cell phone

W.D.Wis.: 4A doesn’t require filing SW and application before service

Filing a search warrant and application before it is served isn’t a constitutional requirement. [And even if it was, where’s the prejudice?] United States v. Robinson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130063 (W.D. Wis. July 8, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: 4A doesn’t require filing SW and application before service

IA: Video shows officers didn’t slow walk traffic stop for dog sniff

On de novo review, the officers didn’t slow walk the traffic citation to get more time to do the dog sniff. State v. Cox, 2025 Iowa App. LEXIS 567 (July 2, 2025)*:

Continue reading
Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Video shows officers didn’t slow walk traffic stop for dog sniff

Reclaim The Net: How Digital Convenience Becomes a Government Backdoor

Reclaim The Net: How Digital Convenience Becomes a Government Backdoor by Christina Maas (“The Supreme Court’s silence keeps 20th-century privacy rules firmly in place while 21st-century surveillance marches on.”). Well, to be frank, the third-party doctrine isn’t going anywhere as to something like crypto. It’s essentially just a bank record under Smith v. Maryland. And “rejects” is a strong word. Cert denial is “declined for now, maybe forever.” From the article:

Continue reading
Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Reclaim The Net: How Digital Convenience Becomes a Government Backdoor

CA8: Social media video of SW target shooting guns justified no-knock entry

Social media videos of a target of the warrant shooting guns viewed before obtaining the warrant justified a no-knock warrant. Davenport v. City of Little Rock, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 16540 (8th Cir. July 7, 2025).

Plaintiff’s various claims, including a Fourth Amendment claim, were barred by limitations. Topolski v. Wash. State Dep’t of Licensing, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128433 (W.D. Wash. July 7, 2025).*

Post-conviction petitioner shows no grounds on which his Instagram messages should have been suppressed. Therefore, no ineffective assistance of counsel. Turcios v. State, 2025 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 311 (July 7, 2025).*

This motion to suppress filed 2½ years after sentencing was waived by the guilty plea, isn’t timely, and defense counsel wasn’t ineffective. Eddington v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128448 (S.D. Ill. July 7, 2025).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Knock and announce | Comments Off on CA8: Social media video of SW target shooting guns justified no-knock entry