Monthly Archives: March 2026

NY Co.: Pulling def out of his doorway when he opened his door was not a violation of Payton

Pulling defendant out of his doorway when he opened his door was not a violation of Payton. People v. Honyghan, 2026 NYLJ LEXIS 435 (N.Y. Co. Mar. 18, 2026). “The arresting officers’ body-worn camera videos reveal that Plaintiff was visibly … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY Co.: Pulling def out of his doorway when he opened his door was not a violation of Payton

NC: Informant doesn’t need “track record” to be creditable

The informant doesn’t need a “track record” to be credited as a source of information. State v. Vandergrift, 2026 N.C. App. LEXIS 202 (Mar. 18, 2026). Police responded to a stolen ATM report and found defendant near an ATM in … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Informant doesn’t need “track record” to be creditable

AP: Rapper Afroman wins lawsuit against police over mocking their 2022 raid in viral music videos

AP: Rapper Afroman wins lawsuit against police over mocking their 2022 raid in viral music videos by Maryclaire Dale (“The Grammy-nominated rapper Afroman won a defamation lawsuit filed by seven Ohio sheriff’s deputies who sued him over music videos in … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on AP: Rapper Afroman wins lawsuit against police over mocking their 2022 raid in viral music videos

FoxNews: Surveillance tech causes police to accuse wrong woman in porch theft investigation

FoxNews: Surveillance tech causes police to accuse wrong woman in porch theft investigation (“License plate reader data led to police accusing the wrong woman of porch theft before new evidence showed the suspect’s vehicle was not at the scene.” It … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on FoxNews: Surveillance tech causes police to accuse wrong woman in porch theft investigation

MT: Owner of a stolen car can’t consent to search of defendant’s stuff in it

Defendant stole Dempsey’s car. The trial court decided he had no standing in a stolen car. The supreme court held that Dempsey’s third-party consent to search defendant’s stuff was invalid. State v. Flores-Reyes, 2026 MT 56 (Mar. 17, 2026). [Generally, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on MT: Owner of a stolen car can’t consent to search of defendant’s stuff in it

CA5: No REP against license plate readers

License plate readers violate no reasonable expectation of privacy. Also, the stop was supported by reasonable suspicion. United States v. Porter, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 7888 (5th Cir. Mar. 17, 2026). The informant’s information was sufficient to show probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Search incident, Seizure | Comments Off on CA5: No REP against license plate readers

D.Utah: Ex parte SW process should not be used for access to tribal lands without adversary proceedings

An ex parte search warrant isn’t appropriate to resolve an unresolved question of law about whether an Indian Tribe can condition access to tribal lands without an “assess permit.” An adversary proceeding is required. In re Search Warrant Application in … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Utah: Ex parte SW process should not be used for access to tribal lands without adversary proceedings

D.Kan.: SW application with expired notary stamp doesn’t violate 4A

A search warrant application that was notarized with an expired notary stamp was not a Fourth Amendment violation. McAlister v. Kansas, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55139 (D. Kan. Mar. 17, 2026). 2255 petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim for not … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on D.Kan.: SW application with expired notary stamp doesn’t violate 4A

CA8: Non-lethal force during George Floyd curfew violating disturbance was reasonable

During the George Floyd riots, the day after a Minneapolis’s third police precinct was burned down, there was another protest around the fifth precinct in violation of a city-wide curfew. Plaintiff was shot in the head with a nonlethal projectile … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA8: Non-lethal force during George Floyd curfew violating disturbance was reasonable

CA10: Protective sweep of car where driver already handcuffed unreasonable

After arrest of driver, the protective sweep of the car left to passenger who owned it, was insured, and had a DL was unreasonable. It was done just because of her romantic relationship with the arrestee. United States v. Williams, … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA10: Protective sweep of car where driver already handcuffed unreasonable

NY: Parole absconder detention lacked RS

“On a cold, late December morning, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision parole officers were attempting to locate a parole absconder for whom they had an arrest warrant.” People v. Jones, 236 A.D.3d 1410, 229 N.Y.S.3d 287 … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY: Parole absconder detention lacked RS

N.D.Ohio: Violating retail store’s “no firearms” prohibition was RS for stop

Defendant’s violating a “no firearms” prohibition at a retail establishment was reasonable suspicion for his stop for trespassing. United States v. Sinkfield, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54823 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 17, 2026). To succeed on an ineffective assistance of counsel … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Violating retail store’s “no firearms” prohibition was RS for stop

N.D.Cal.: Recognizes $800 per hour for 10-year lawyer in civil rights case

In a discovery fee sanctions case in a First Amendment case, the USMJ notes that $395-450 per hour was reasonable, noting that seven months ago the court approved $800 in a First and Fourth Amendment case. Goldberg v. Teachbk, Inc., … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Recognizes $800 per hour for 10-year lawyer in civil rights case

CA2: Def’s affidavit of standing failed to show it; who gave permission to be there and when?

Defendant didn’t show standing in his affidavit offer of proof to pursue his motion to suppress. It wasn’t his place and he had limited use of it but doesn’t say who gave access. United States v. Caesar, 2026 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Standing | Comments Off on CA2: Def’s affidavit of standing failed to show it; who gave permission to be there and when?

CA7: Officer did all he could to determine whether place to be searched was single unit or multi-unit

In an anticipatory warrant case, the officer did all he could to determine whether the premises was a single unit or not, and everything suggested it was single. “[T]he agents’ investigation of the facts contained in the warrant, and their … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: Officer did all he could to determine whether place to be searched was single unit or multi-unit

NH: Exigency didn’t exist for cell phone pings

Officers got a warrant for a cell site simulator to look for defendant’s phone fearing he was leaving the country by air from JFK to Europe to evade arrest, but they didn’t use it. Also, the flight he was scheduled … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Cell site simulators, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NH: Exigency didn’t exist for cell phone pings

DC: Alleged violation of Rule 41(b) for “property located within the district” not subject to exclusionary rule when property is moving

A warrant to ping a cell phone in the DC Metro area which is three jurisdictions (DC, MD, VA) to find defendant to arrest him was with probable cause and good faith despite an alleged violation of Rule 41(b).“Rule 41(b) … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception | Comments Off on DC: Alleged violation of Rule 41(b) for “property located within the district” not subject to exclusionary rule when property is moving

TN: A social guest with standing doesn’t have it in open fields

As a social guest occasionally spending the night, defendant had standing and a reasonable expectation of privacy in the house and curtilage when he was there. Not, however, in the property’s open fields. State v. Mabe, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Open fields, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on TN: A social guest with standing doesn’t have it in open fields

NY Tompkins Co.: SW used for inventory of safe in a vehicle

An ALPR told officers that the owner had a suspended DL, and that justified the stop. The passenger had an arrest warrant on him. The vehicle was impounded. Behind an unsecured panel, a digital safe was found, and it was … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY Tompkins Co.: SW used for inventory of safe in a vehicle

ND: Dog sniff occurred before the Rodriguez moment and was reasonable

The dog sniff occurred before the Rodriguez moment and was thus reasonable. State v. Cooper, 2026 ND 68, 2026 N.D. LEXIS 99 (Mar. 12, 2026) On the totality of circumstances, there was reasonable suspicion as to defendant as the subject … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ND: Dog sniff occurred before the Rodriguez moment and was reasonable