Daily Archives: March 17, 2026

CA7: Officer did all he could to determine whether place to be searched was single unit or multi-unit

In an anticipatory warrant case, the officer did all he could to determine whether the premises was a single unit or not, and everything suggested it was single. “[T]he agents’ investigation of the facts contained in the warrant, and their … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: Officer did all he could to determine whether place to be searched was single unit or multi-unit

NH: Exigency didn’t exist for cell phone pings

Officers got a warrant for a cell site simulator to look for defendant’s phone fearing he was leaving the country by air from JFK to Europe to evade arrest, but they didn’t use it. Also, the flight he was scheduled … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Cell site simulators, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NH: Exigency didn’t exist for cell phone pings

DC: Alleged violation of Rule 41(b) for “property located within the district” not subject to exclusionary rule when property is moving

A warrant to ping a cell phone in the DC Metro area which is three jurisdictions (DC, MD, VA) to find defendant to arrest him was with probable cause and good faith despite an alleged violation of Rule 41(b).“Rule 41(b) … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception | Comments Off on DC: Alleged violation of Rule 41(b) for “property located within the district” not subject to exclusionary rule when property is moving

TN: A social guest with standing doesn’t have it in open fields

As a social guest occasionally spending the night, defendant had standing and a reasonable expectation of privacy in the house and curtilage when he was there. Not, however, in the property’s open fields. State v. Mabe, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Open fields, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on TN: A social guest with standing doesn’t have it in open fields

NY Tompkins Co.: SW used for inventory of safe in a vehicle

An ALPR told officers that the owner had a suspended DL, and that justified the stop. The passenger had an arrest warrant on him. The vehicle was impounded. Behind an unsecured panel, a digital safe was found, and it was … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY Tompkins Co.: SW used for inventory of safe in a vehicle

ND: Dog sniff occurred before the Rodriguez moment and was reasonable

The dog sniff occurred before the Rodriguez moment and was thus reasonable. State v. Cooper, 2026 ND 68, 2026 N.D. LEXIS 99 (Mar. 12, 2026) On the totality of circumstances, there was reasonable suspicion as to defendant as the subject … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ND: Dog sniff occurred before the Rodriguez moment and was reasonable

D.D.C.: Challenging standing to object to a GJ subpoena can be waived

Standing to challenge a grand jury subpoena is like Fourth Amendment standing. It’s not jurisdictional, and it can be waived. “The Supreme Court has made clear that Fourth Amendment standing ‘is not a jurisdictional question’ but instead part ‘of the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Challenging standing to object to a GJ subpoena can be waived

IN: State rule that consent to search carries with it a right to consult counsel doesn’t apply to police in another state acting on their own

Conflict of laws: Indiana’s Pirtle rule that consent searches afford a right to consult with counsel doesn’t apply to police in another state that encounter defendant and get consent to search. Mendenhall v. State, 2026 Ind. App. LEXIS 81 (Mar. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Conflict of laws, Consent, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on IN: State rule that consent to search carries with it a right to consult counsel doesn’t apply to police in another state acting on their own

TN: Drug history essentially shows nexus to cell phone

Defendant’s drug history was essentially enough to show nexus to a cell phone. State v. White, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 131 (Mar. 13, 2026). A civil standby with a police officer for an apartment inspection didn’t violate the Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Private search, Search | Comments Off on TN: Drug history essentially shows nexus to cell phone

W.D.Wis.: Pro se ptf gets jury trial verdict for $550,000 for illegal search and malicious prosecution

Pro se plaintiff gets jury trial verdict for $550,000 for illegal search and malicious prosecution thereafter. The jury was free to conclude that the basis for the search was invented. Coleman v. Sperry, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52527 (W.D. Wis. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: Pro se ptf gets jury trial verdict for $550,000 for illegal search and malicious prosecution