Daily Archives: March 26, 2026

E.D.La.: RS def was armed in a NOLA firearms free zone

The officer had reasonable suspicion defendant was armed, but also in a firearm-free zone during Mardi Gras which was reasonably determined. United States v. Bryant, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62869 (E.D. La. Mar. 25, 2026).* 2255 petitioner’s guilty plea waived … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.La.: RS def was armed in a NOLA firearms free zone

N.D.Ind.: Police arriving during ongoing 911 call justified entry on exigency

Officers arrived at the house the subject of an open 911 call during the emergency, and that authorized entry. United States v. Bray, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63142 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 25, 2026).* The court can’t tell from the body … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Police arriving during ongoing 911 call justified entry on exigency

CA9: 48-hour delay in getting a warrant for a mailed package wasn’t unreasonable

A 48 hour delay in getting a warrant for a mailed package wasn’t unreasonable. United States v. Garza, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 8714 (9th Cir. Mar. 25, 2026). Petitioner’s bank records were obtained by search warrant. They are third party … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Issue preclusion, Mail and packages, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA9: 48-hour delay in getting a warrant for a mailed package wasn’t unreasonable

W.D.N.Y.: Def had standing in his work premises under Mancusi v. Deforte

Defendant had standing in his work premises under Mancusi v. Deforte. On the merits his Franks challenge fails: “Even assuming arguendo that any of the above challenged statements could be considered false or misleading, Defendants have put forth no credible … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Def had standing in his work premises under Mancusi v. Deforte

D.S.D.: The fact a protective sweep came up empty doesn’t mean it wasn’t justified

“The court finds that the government has met its burden of demonstrating that the protective sweep exception to the warrant requirement applies. Before the protective sweep, officers received reports that someone matching Mr. Day’s physical description and alias was threatening … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.D.: The fact a protective sweep came up empty doesn’t mean it wasn’t justified

NPR: Your data is everywhere. The government is buying it without a warrant

NPR: Your data is everywhere. The government is buying it without a warrant by Jude Joffe-Block:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NPR: Your data is everywhere. The government is buying it without a warrant

N.D.W.Va.: Bare allegations of a Franks violation without a significant offer of proof is conjecture

Bare allegations of a Franks violation without a significant offer of proof is conjecture. Kokinda v. Foster, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60028 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 23, 2026).* Exigent circumstances justified the seizure of defendant’s cell phone, not just plain view, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: Bare allegations of a Franks violation without a significant offer of proof is conjecture