Category Archives: Warrant papers

S.D.N.Y.: SW affidavit not yet available to def merely for bail application

Defendant doesn’t get to see the affidavit for warrant yet just for his bail application because the government asserts the investigation is still ongoing. Discovery of child pornography was inadvertent, and the bail application isn’t a discovery device. The question … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: SW affidavit not yet available to def merely for bail application

CA6: State issuing magistrate’s failure to transcribe supplemental information for PC was not enough to suppress

The affidavit and supplementing testimony provided substantial probable cause for issuance of the warrant. State law requires any testimony supplementing a search warrant affidavit be preserved and transcribed. The state issuing magistrate failed. The officer, however, acted in good faith, … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Immigration arrests, Neutral and detached magistrate, Qualified immunity, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA6: State issuing magistrate’s failure to transcribe supplemental information for PC was not enough to suppress

S.D.N.Y.: Arrested target of cell phone SW has common law right of access to affidavit and SW

The target’s motion to unseal the search warrant affidavit for his cell phone is granted. There is a common law right of access, and the First Amendment right of access does not even have to be decided. The government’s only … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Arrested target of cell phone SW has common law right of access to affidavit and SW

W.D.La.: Failure to make a timely return of SW papers is not a const’l error

Failure to make a timely return of the warrant to the issuing court is not a constitutional error, and there is no showing of prejudice. United States v. Warren, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176014 (W.D. La. Aug. 18, 2023), adopted, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Failure to make a timely return of SW papers is not a const’l error

S.D.Tex.: Court declines to unseal warrant papers yet; redaction not feasible

The search warrant papers involving search of property of a U.S. Representative are not unsealed yet. The redactions were nearly everywhere and it would not make sense. The interests in temporary nondisclosure are more important here; the government has made … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Pretext, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Court declines to unseal warrant papers yet; redaction not feasible

E.D.Pa.: Ongoing investigation bars access to warrant papers for time being

The target of a search warrant can’t yet get access to the affidavit in support because the case is still under investigation and there is a potential of exposing grand jury witnesses. In re Search Warrants Issued November 30, 2022, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Ongoing investigation bars access to warrant papers for time being

D.S.D. & OH5: When challenging another court’s SW, it has to be filed with the papers for the court to rule

Defendant challenges the tribal search warrant as lacking probable cause and being vindictively obtained, the latter of which does not exist under Rule 41. He fails to include the warrant papers so the court can’t rule. United States v. Floyd, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Consent, Excessive force, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.S.D. & OH5: When challenging another court’s SW, it has to be filed with the papers for the court to rule

E.D.La.: Leaving the wrong SW at the scene of the search is not a ground to suppress

Leaving the wrong search warrant at the scene of the search is not a ground to suppress. United States v. Major, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116569 (E.D. La. July 7, 2023). The CI had no track record, but his story … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Leaving the wrong SW at the scene of the search is not a ground to suppress

E.D.Mich.: Failure to file SW return doesn’t require suppression

Failure to file the warrant return doesn’t require suppression. It’s a curable ministerial act. Besides, the defendant can’t show prejudice. As to the merits, the search warrant was issued with probable cause and the good faith exception applies in any … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Plain view, feel, smell, Staleness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Failure to file SW return doesn’t require suppression

FL1: If trial court refuses to unseal SW affidavit, in camera review must be sought to preserve issue

Defendant sought unsealing of the search warrant affidavit which the state successfully resisted on the ground of informant privilege in other ongoing investigations. The defense never sought in camera review. Without that, the issue was unpreserved for appellate review. Leverette … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, State constitution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on FL1: If trial court refuses to unseal SW affidavit, in camera review must be sought to preserve issue

S.D.W.Va.: No 4A right to leaving SW at scene of search

Searching officers do not violate the Fourth Amendment by not leaving a copy of the search warrant, let alone the original. Carter v. Luciano, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101723 (S.D. W. Va. June 12, 2023).* The search warrant was based … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Exclusionary rule, Prison and jail searches, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: No 4A right to leaving SW at scene of search

TX9: Affidavit for a SW is a public record

The affidavit for a search warrant is a public record. $49,815.00 in United States Currency v. State, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 3775 (Tex. App. – Beaumont June 1, 2023). Defendant did not “distance himself” from the bags in the car … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Standing, Warrant papers | Comments Off on TX9: Affidavit for a SW is a public record

AZ: Confession obtained after Franks violation should have been suppressed, too

The trial court found a Franks violation from the officer overstating with reckless disregard the facts, and it suppressed the search. Then came defendant’s statements based on the false search warrant affidavit. The trial court did not suppress, but the … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on AZ: Confession obtained after Franks violation should have been suppressed, too

CO: Typo in date (9/9 v. 9/30) in SW affidavit could be overlooked by other contents referring to previous few hours; GFE also applies

The typographical error in the affidavit showing the date as September 9th when it should have been September 30th could be overlooked because the affidavit as a whole referred to the previous few hours, and the good faith exception applies. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search, Staleness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CO: Typo in date (9/9 v. 9/30) in SW affidavit could be overlooked by other contents referring to previous few hours; GFE also applies

CA11: Mere fact of a firearm in the home wasn’t exigency here

“Although Officer Plesnik now arrived with the knowledge that there was a firearm on site, the mere presence of a firearm—without more—did not transform the non-exigent scene into an exigent circumstance and trigger the emergency aid exception. Indeed, by the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Warrant papers, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA11: Mere fact of a firearm in the home wasn’t exigency here

N.D.Ala.: Wrong street number in a SW didn’t void it where house was well described and officers had been there before

The wrong street number on the search warrant did not make it invalid. Officers knew the house from surveillance, and it was described. The right house was searched. “So, the erroneous street number did not make the warrant invalid.” Threatt … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Voluntariness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Wrong street number in a SW didn’t void it where house was well described and officers had been there before

M.D.Ga.: No standing in packages sent to one’s address but with all different names on them

Defendant failed to show standing in packages searched coming to an address he claimed as his “primary address,” but the addressee and sender were not him. United States v. Williams, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26755 (M.D. Ga. Feb. 16, 2023). … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Mail and packages, Standing, Warrant papers | Comments Off on M.D.Ga.: No standing in packages sent to one’s address but with all different names on them

NE: Failure to deliver SW to def not 4A violation and doesn’t warrant suppression

Defendant was the subject of a search warrant for a blood draw. The fact he wasn’t given a copy of the warrant doesn’t require reversal. He clearly knew what was going on. State v. Svendgard, 31 Neb. App. 596, 2023 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Exclusionary rule, Forfeiture, Warrant papers | Comments Off on NE: Failure to deliver SW to def not 4A violation and doesn’t warrant suppression

NY2: SW papers provided to GJ aren’t discoverable because of GJ secrecy

Defendant sought search warrant materials presented to the grand jury. Denied because of grand jury secrecy. Sculti v. Finley, 2022 NY Slip Op 06950, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6820 (2d Dept. Dec. 7, 2022). Defendant had no standing in … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant papers | Comments Off on NY2: SW papers provided to GJ aren’t discoverable because of GJ secrecy

W.D.Pa.: All Writs Act proceeding for tracking order is a judicial proceeding for common law right of access to records

An All Writs Act proceeding by the government to track someone in real time back in 2020 is a judicial record subject to the common law right of disclosure of court records. In re Forbes Media LLC, 2022 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule, Tracking warrant, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: All Writs Act proceeding for tracking order is a judicial proceeding for common law right of access to records