S.D.Ala.: Failure to timely make SW return under state law not a 4A issue

The fact the search warrant paperwork wasn’t returned on time which made it void under state law isn’t relevant under the Fourth Amendment in federal court. Jackson v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 235912 (S.D. Ala. Dec. 4, 2024), adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1654 (S.D. Ala. Jan. 6, 2025).

The issue here is whether defense counsel was ineffective for not raising an issue of the presence of an HBO film crew during the drug search. That was litigated in state post-conviction, and the claim failed on the merits. It can’t be relitigated here. Harmon v. Payne, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2371 (E.D. Ark. Jan. 7, 2025).*

Defendant agreed to forfeiture in his plea agreement, and he can’t get return of property now. United States v. Grabau, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2367 (N.D. Iowa Jan. 7, 2025).*

The defendant officer’s use of force to attempt to break up a fight was reasonable. Imbriano v. Murray, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2406 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 7, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Excessive force, Reasonableness, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d), Warrant papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.