Author Archives: Hall

TX3: Motion to suppress never ruled on is waived for appeal

Defendant filed a motion to suppress but didn’t get a hearing or ruling on it. Then, at trial, made a motion in limine but that didn’t preserve the lack of probable cause issue from the motion to suppress. It’s all … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Waiver | Comments Off on TX3: Motion to suppress never ruled on is waived for appeal

CA9: 5A takings clause doesn’t support damages claim during SWAT siege; concurrence seemingly finds 4A privilege

Pena v. City of L.A., 158 F.4th 1033 (9th Cir. 2025). From the Syllabus:

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on CA9: 5A takings clause doesn’t support damages claim during SWAT siege; concurrence seemingly finds 4A privilege

CA11: ALPR showing short round trip to Atlanta supported stop with RS

On plain error review, it can’t be said there was no reasonable suspicion whatsoever essentially based on a license plate reader that the car’s round trip to Atlanta was suspiciously short. Thus, “we cannot say that the district court committed … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA11: ALPR showing short round trip to Atlanta supported stop with RS

UT: Inventory policy needs somehow to be in evidence to challenge scope of search

If you’re challenging whether the officer exceeded an inventory policy, it needs to be in evidence. Here there was only testimony about the written policy, and the court could rely on that. Here, the claim was that inventorying a backpack … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory, Scope of search | Comments Off on UT: Inventory policy needs somehow to be in evidence to challenge scope of search

E.D.La.: Parties present their issues timely, not in motions to reconsider

From 10/5 post: Defendant here satisfied his Franks burden of showing a lack of probable cause after the false information was excised. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Wells, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195302 (E.D. La. Oct. 2, 2025).* … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Parties present their issues timely, not in motions to reconsider

NMI: “An arrest warrant is exhausted once used.”

“An arrest warrant is exhausted once used. Carlson v. Landon, 342 U.S. 524, 546 (1952); ….” After that, another must issue. The trial court didn’t err in requiring one. Commonwealth v. Superior Court, 2025 MP 14 (N.M.I. Dec. 23, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Nexus | Comments Off on NMI: “An arrest warrant is exhausted once used.”

MI: Officer seeing def drunk an hour before he was driving was a reasonable conclusion

The district court erred in suppressing by finding no probable cause for a stop. “Because we conclude that Officer Prater’s observations of defendant in a drunken state no more than one hour before the stop furnished the officer with reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: Officer seeing def drunk an hour before he was driving was a reasonable conclusion

WaPo: ICE shift in tactics leads to soaring number of at-large arrests, data shows

WaPo: ICE shift in tactics leads to soaring number of at-large arrests, data shows by Marianne LeVine, Emmanuel Martinez & Álvaro Valiño (“The agency has moved away from focusing on arresting migrants at local jails to tracking them down in … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on WaPo: ICE shift in tactics leads to soaring number of at-large arrests, data shows

HI: Failure to argue PC at suppression hearing was waiver for appeal

Where the defense didn’t argue a lack of probable cause at the suppression hearing, that could not be raised on appeal. State v. Arbogast, 2025 Haw. App. LEXIS 617 (Dec. 23, 2025) (unpublished).* Defendant’s stop was reasonable and his spontaneous … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings, Waiver | Comments Off on HI: Failure to argue PC at suppression hearing was waiver for appeal

CA5: ME’s alleged false autopsy didn’t state a Franks claim

A medical examiner’s alleged false autopsy report didn’t state a Franks violation because he wasn’t the affiant in any warrant. Dean v. Phatak, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 33645 (5th Cir. Dec. 23, 2025):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA5: ME’s alleged false autopsy didn’t state a Franks claim

C.D.Ill.: Easily entered iPhone moots how passcode was obtained

Even if the passcode was obtained unreasonably, this iPhone would have been gotten into anyway. The officer had done it before on these earlier models, and that’s inevitable discovery. United States v. Fassero, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 265273 (C.D. Ill. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Inventory, Neutral and detached magistrate, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Easily entered iPhone moots how passcode was obtained

CA9: Taking too long to get SW for phone violated clearly established law

The officer here violated clearly established law by taking too long to apply for a warrant to search plaintiff’s cell phone. Plaintiff promptly sought its return, but that was denied because the officer hadn’t got a warrant yet. Langham v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Taking too long to get SW for phone violated clearly established law

PA: Officer can’t impound a car just to avoid state automobile exception

Pennsylvania’s automobile exception is more stringent than the Fourth Amendment requiring exigency. The state can’t end run a refusal to consent by impounding a car to get into it. Commonwealth v. Rosario, 2025 PA Super 286 (Dec. 23, 2025). “First, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Officer can’t impound a car just to avoid state automobile exception

MN: GFE does not apply to after search changes in law that were obviously coming

“The good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule does not apply to a warrantless vehicle search based solely on the smell of marijuana that occurred before we issued our opinion in State v. Torgerson, 995 N.W.2d 164 (Minn. 2023), which held … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on MN: GFE does not apply to after search changes in law that were obviously coming

SCOTUS: Kavanaugh says immigration stops still require RS

Trump v. Illinois, 2025 U.S. LEXIS 4766 (U.S. Dec. 23, 2025), involving the President calling up the National Guard in Illinois, the government failed to prove an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act. [At first, I elected to omit this, … Continue reading

Posted in immigration stops, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Kavanaugh says immigration stops still require RS

IN: Failure to execute social media warrant in 10 days per statute did not require suppression where PC still existed

The search warrant on defendant’s social media accounts took longer to be executed than the ten days state statute provided for, but that wasn’t reason to exclude the product of the search. Despite the statutory violation, the real question is … Continue reading

Posted in Social media warrants, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on IN: Failure to execute social media warrant in 10 days per statute did not require suppression where PC still existed

D.Minn.: No duty for officer to resolve traffic stop questions before safety concerns resolved

“All of these questions lasted fewer than thirty seconds–they did not ‘measurably extend’ the stop. Johnson, 555 U.S. at 333. Ali cites no law that suggests that officers must address the traffic infraction before they may ask questions related to … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Minn.: No duty for officer to resolve traffic stop questions before safety concerns resolved

D.D.C.: Comey attorney-computer search redux

In the Comey attorney-client privileged search, the government was ordered to return the evidence, not destroy it. Another alternative is to deposit it with the court subject to another search warrant, if the government can get one. Richman v. United … Continue reading

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Comey attorney-computer search redux

TX2: Taking car keys doesn’t make an investigative detention a custodial arrest

“[A]n officer’s confiscation of a suspect’s keys during an investigative detention does not automatically escalate the stop into a custodial arrest.” Here, it was a DUI stop and taking the keys was for safety reasons. Bwondara v. State, 2025 Tex. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell site location information | Comments Off on TX2: Taking car keys doesn’t make an investigative detention a custodial arrest

NY Kings Co.: Def had a REP in his space in a homeless shelter

Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his space in a homeless shelter against a warrantless entry. People v. Maquila, 2025 NY Slip Op 25270, 2025 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 9887 (Kings Co. Dec. 17, 2025):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NY Kings Co.: Def had a REP in his space in a homeless shelter