Author Archives: Hall

CT: IAC in cell phone search decided on lack of prejudice, not the merits

Defendant was convicted of accessory to murder. He claimed trial counsel was ineffective for not moving to suppress the 2013 search of his cell phone. Police sought a warrant for the phone, and the DA prepared it. While the papers … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CT: IAC in cell phone search decided on lack of prejudice, not the merits

CA5: Siccing police dog on woman in mental health crisis was excessive force; no crime involved

“Without any further attempts to subdue Sligh without the use of a dog bite, and without providing Sligh any warning that she may be subjected to a dog bite if she did not comply, Sutton sicced a dog on a … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA5: Siccing police dog on woman in mental health crisis was excessive force; no crime involved

Reason: DEA’s Domestic Surveillance ‘Mission Creep’

Reason: DEA’s Domestic Surveillance ‘Mission Creep’ by Patrick Eddington (“It appears that DEA agents have been employed on non-drug-related investigations for far longer than they were originally authorized.”)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Reason: DEA’s Domestic Surveillance ‘Mission Creep’

Reason: Marvin Guy, Who Shot a Cop During a No-Knock Raid, Is Found Guilty of Murder

Reason: Marvin Guy, Who Shot a Cop During a No-Knock Raid, Is Found Guilty of Murder by Billy Binion (“He is not the first defendant that has struggled to reconcile the controversial raids with self-defense.”)

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on Reason: Marvin Guy, Who Shot a Cop During a No-Knock Raid, Is Found Guilty of Murder

S.D.Fla.: Scrolling through electronic devices at the border is reasonable in CA11

Merely scrolling through an electronic device at the border is a reasonable border search. United States v. Vrdoljak, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 208332 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 20, 2023). The officer was incidentally following defendant, and he observed her driving within … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Scrolling through electronic devices at the border is reasonable in CA11

NC: Officer who made illegal entry was not discharging “official duty” when he was assaulted

“As a warrant was required for the officers to lawfully enter the home, and no warrant had been issued when the officers entered the home and encountered Defendant, the officers’ entry into the home was unlawful. Thus, the State failed … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on NC: Officer who made illegal entry was not discharging “official duty” when he was assaulted

LA4: CI’s success rate not important when CI corroborated by controlled buy

The affidavit for the warrant here did, in fact, show probable cause and nexus from the informant’s reports corroborated by observations of the officers. The lack of a success rate by the CI wasn’t as important when he was corroborated … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on LA4: CI’s success rate not important when CI corroborated by controlled buy

CA11: The bodycam video showed the altercation with ptf and hospital security was reasonable

The bodycam video of plaintiff’s altercation with two hospital security guards showed they were entitled to qualified immunity. Scott v. Harris. Bouvier v. City of Covington, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 30822 (11th Cir. Nov. 20, 2023).* In excessive force cases, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: The bodycam video showed the altercation with ptf and hospital security was reasonable

NY Erie Co.: Temporary Extreme Risk Protection Order didn’t satisfy 4A for criminal case

An officer sought a Temporary Extreme Risk Protection Order (TERPO) under NYS law for defendant’s allegedly pointing a gun at his alleged victims from a car. This is a civil remedy, and, here, it did not provide any protection under … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Seizure | Comments Off on NY Erie Co.: Temporary Extreme Risk Protection Order didn’t satisfy 4A for criminal case

WV: SW for items that are also common to any home doesn’t make warrant general; it’s specific enough

Officers had two search warrants for Gray’s place, and defendant complained that the warrant described things common to any home. There was probable cause for that stuff, and there’s no requirement of a more specific description. State v. Knotts, 2023 … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Cell site location information, Particularity | Comments Off on WV: SW for items that are also common to any home doesn’t make warrant general; it’s specific enough

CA11: Def claims he was talking with a VA clinician, but it was a CI; no REP in conversation

Defendant was ultimately accused of theft of government funds and false statements about his VA benefits. A phone call with an informant was recorded. He claims he thought it was a clinician with whom he had a reasonable expectation of … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Staleness, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA11: Def claims he was talking with a VA clinician, but it was a CI; no REP in conversation

N.D.Iowa: Even though stop showed def wasn’t impaired, DL and LPN could still be run

Even though defendant apparently wasn’t driving impaired, once validly stopped, the officer could run DL and LPN checks. The dog sniff didn’t prolong the stop at all. United States v. Drayton, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206461 (N.D. Iowa Oct. 10, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Even though stop showed def wasn’t impaired, DL and LPN could still be run

IA: Shining flashlights or patrol car spotlights on driver in an already parked car is not a seizure

Defendant was seen driving fast in a parking lot near a bar after 2 am. Officers parked near him and approached on foot. They shined their flashlights on the driver from both sides. The use of flashlights was not a … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on IA: Shining flashlights or patrol car spotlights on driver in an already parked car is not a seizure

D.Mass.: Plea agreement foreclosed return of property

Defendant’s plea agreement foreclosed his Rule 41(g) motion for return of property. United States v. Spencer, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206257 (D. Mass. Nov. 17, 2023). Defendant’s motion to reconsider denial of his motion to suppress the timeliness of his … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Motion to suppress, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Voluntariness | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Plea agreement foreclosed return of property

N.D.Cal.: No REP in a computer possessed in a halfway house

Plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a computer given him by Goodwill for whom he worked while he was living in a halfway house. He was still an inmate of the BOP. “There is no reasonable or legitimate … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: No REP in a computer possessed in a halfway house

UT: Being hospitalized having been shot by police isn’t “custody” for Miranda purposes

A person hospitalized after having been shot by the police is not per se “in custody” for Miranda purposes. The reason for the shooting was the safety of the officers and others, not custody. Tennessee v. Garner isn’t even close, … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Custody, Particularity, Standing | Comments Off on UT: Being hospitalized having been shot by police isn’t “custody” for Miranda purposes

CA7: Hospital medical staff getting def to spit out machine gun part wasn’t search and they weren’t govt actors

Defendant had a Glock fully auto switch in his mouth while in the hospital. While treating him, the medical staff finally got him to spit it out. That was not a search. The medical staff were not government actors for … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Private search, Search, Waiver | Comments Off on CA7: Hospital medical staff getting def to spit out machine gun part wasn’t search and they weren’t govt actors

S.D.N.Y.: If the SW lacks PC, the remedy is a motion to suppress, not a motion to rescind the SW via 41(g)

Defendant filed a motion for the court to rescind the search warrant for his cell phone under Rule 41(g) because it was allegedly defective. The remedy is a motion to suppress, not to rescind. United States v. Cardenas, 2023 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: If the SW lacks PC, the remedy is a motion to suppress, not a motion to rescind the SW via 41(g)

NYT: Talks on Surveillance Law Simmer as Its Expiration Date Looms

NYT: Talks on Surveillance Law Simmer as Its Expiration Date Looms by Charlie Savage (“Negotiations in Congress over a warrantless surveillance law are intensifying as it nears its expiration date. The debate has come during what national security officials say … Continue reading

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on NYT: Talks on Surveillance Law Simmer as Its Expiration Date Looms

The Intercept: LexisNexis Sold Powerful Spy Tools to U.S. Customs and Border Protection

The Intercept: LexisNexis Sold Powerful Spy Tools to U.S. Customs and Border Protection by Sam Biddle (“The data brokerage giant sold face recognition, phone tracking, and other surveillance technology to the border guards, say government documents.”)

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on The Intercept: LexisNexis Sold Powerful Spy Tools to U.S. Customs and Border Protection