Author Archives: Hall

CA8: Hot pursuit justified entry into bank robbery suspect’s home

Hot pursuit was shown for entry into defendant’s home after a trail of evidence led officers there. At the door they could see young children inside and someone on the stairs even though the woman answering the door insisted no … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Hot pursuit, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Hot pursuit justified entry into bank robbery suspect’s home

W.D.Okla.: When officer’s observation obviates the reason for the stop, the already initiated warrant check can be completed

Defendant was stopped for suspected DUI and a warrant check was called for. The officer promptly learned that defendant wasn’t DUI, but it was reasonable to still wait for the warrant check to be completed, here just a couple of … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: When officer’s observation obviates the reason for the stop, the already initiated warrant check can be completed

NY Nassau: Mere theory someone else is inside when it’s not even practical doesn’t support a protective sweep

Police were sent to defendant’s house/dentist office on a report of his menacing with a firearm. Defendant came out and submitted. The entry into the house for exigency or protective sweep was not shown by the state to be justified. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep | Comments Off on NY Nassau: Mere theory someone else is inside when it’s not even practical doesn’t support a protective sweep

DC parolee’s GPS monitor can only be placed by court order

Defendant’s GPS monitoring while on D.C. parole was unauthorized without an order from the sentencing court. It also doesn’t fit under Knights and Samson and special needs. Therefore, its use here to connect defendant to a crime is suppressed. Davis … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Waiver | Comments Off on DC parolee’s GPS monitor can only be placed by court order

S.D.N.Y.: CA2 doesn’t recognize “stalking horse” theory of probation searches

“Skyfield’s stalking horse theory ‘that the NYPD was the real law enforcement animator’ behind the Probation Office’s actions is therefore inconsistent with binding Second Circuit precedent. United States v. Chandler, 56 F.4th 27, 43 (2d Cir. 2022), cert. denied, 143 … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: CA2 doesn’t recognize “stalking horse” theory of probation searches

OH10: Handing backpack to friend to hold was not abandonment

“However, abandonment for Fourth Amendment purposes differs from abandonment in terms of property law. ‘In the context of search and seizure law, abandonment refers to a manifestation or appearance that the person has no interest in the property, rather than … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Waiver | Comments Off on OH10: Handing backpack to friend to hold was not abandonment

CA9: Questions about supervised release status and request for consent during traffic stop are reasonable

This traffic stop was not unreasonably extended. “Officers were permitted to ask Contreras about his supervisory release status as an ordinary inquiry incident to a traffic stop. … Officers were also allowed to conduct a criminal records search. … Likewise, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA9: Questions about supervised release status and request for consent during traffic stop are reasonable

Cal.6: SW for fingerprint to unlock cell phone wasn’t unreasonable under 4A or testimonial compulsion under 5A

The officers here got a search warrant which required defendant to submit to unlocking his cell phone with his fingerprint. They opened the phone, but then it locked and they needed a second warrant to unlock it again. The affidavit … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Privileges | Comments Off on Cal.6: SW for fingerprint to unlock cell phone wasn’t unreasonable under 4A or testimonial compulsion under 5A

NY4: No standing in search of a common basement storage area “not associated with his apartment”

Defendant showed no standing to contest a search of a common basement storage area, “not associated with his apartment.” People v. Ocasio, 2023 NY Slip Op 06623, 2023 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6727 (4th Dept. Dec. 22, 2023). Even if … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on NY4: No standing in search of a common basement storage area “not associated with his apartment”

N.D.Tex.: Video camera in pretrial detainee’s cell that showed the toilet was reasonable

“Ellis alleges that the placement of cameras in his cell that could record the toilet violated his Fourth Amendment right to privacy and constituted a state tort of invasion of privacy. ECF No. 19 at 19-22. But a pretrial detainee … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Video camera in pretrial detainee’s cell that showed the toilet was reasonable

OH8: State showed need for evidence for further investigation after indictment dismissed without prejudice so no return

Evidence was seized, including a cell phone, and defendant was charged with a violent crime. As the case progressed to trial, the state moved to dismiss without prejudice so it could investigate further. Defendant sought return of the evidence. On … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Waiver | Comments Off on OH8: State showed need for evidence for further investigation after indictment dismissed without prejudice so no return

D.P.R.: No REP of corporate officers in medical records in health care fraud case

Records were taken by a corporate whistleblower on a flash drive from a Puerto Rican health care provider. That led to a 122-count indictment for health care fraud. A motion to suppress was filed over the records. Defendants were corporate … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Protective sweep, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: No REP of corporate officers in medical records in health care fraud case

N-M: 94-day delay in getting cell phone SW was unreasonable; GFE not applicable

The search of defendant’s iPhones and iPads lacked probable cause at the time it happened. His wife had apparent authority to search because she knew the passcodes but that doesn’t equate to her apparent authority to seize them. Also, the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Military searches, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N-M: 94-day delay in getting cell phone SW was unreasonable; GFE not applicable

S.D.N.Y.: Policy directive for criminal court appearance strip searches presumptively public and not sealed

This is litigation over strip searches of detainees coming into the Manhattan Criminal Court building for court. A policy directive from another case litigated in 2018 is pertinent. The presumption of access to public records applies, and the directive will … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Policy directive for criminal court appearance strip searches presumptively public and not sealed

CA11: Crew of foreign registered ship boarded in international waters has no 4A standing

Defendant had no Fourth Amendment standing when he was a foreign national on a ship of a foreign country that drew the Coast Guard’s attention south of the Cayman Islands. The Coast Guard finally boarded the ship after the country … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, Foreign searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA11: Crew of foreign registered ship boarded in international waters has no 4A standing

S.D.N.Y.: Controlled buy at def’s door + sound from inside = protective sweep

Officers did a controlled buy [used to be called “buy-bust”] of drugs and then used the alleged noise from inside to justify a protective sweep. The protective sweep was valid. Defendant was in the doorway and Santana (1976) justified the … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Issue preclusion, Protective sweep | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Controlled buy at def’s door + sound from inside = protective sweep

W.D.N.C.: No REP against being tracked by bait bill tracker from bank robbery

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy to not be tracked by a device planted in bait bills taken in a bank robbery. United States v. Day, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226779 (W.D. N.C. Nov. 6, 2023), adopted 2023 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: No REP against being tracked by bait bill tracker from bank robbery

VA: Stop of men on street matching BOLO for other officers to arrive in two minutes was reasonable

The first officer to encounter defendant was responding to a BOLO of suspects on the street related to a nearby home invasion. They were close enough to the description. He stopped them and held them about two minutes until other … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on VA: Stop of men on street matching BOLO for other officers to arrive in two minutes was reasonable

D.Mass.: No PC here, and government’s GFE argument is generic and unhelpful

The affidavit for warrant here failed to show probable cause to believe a pill manufacturing operation would be found there. There was old information in the affidavit, but it was stale on its own. Also, defendants moved in the meantime … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Mass.: No PC here, and government’s GFE argument is generic and unhelpful

LA Times: California police required to state reason for traffic stops before questioning drivers next year

LA Times: California police required to state reason for traffic stops before questioning drivers next year by Noah Goldberg (“Starting Jan. 1, California police officers will have to tell drivers why they’ve been pulled over before questioning them on any … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA Times: California police required to state reason for traffic stops before questioning drivers next year