W.D.N.C.: No REP against being tracked by bait bill tracker from bank robbery

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy to not be tracked by a device planted in bait bills taken in a bank robbery. United States v. Day, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226779 (W.D. N.C. Nov. 6, 2023), adopted 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226025 (W.D. N.C. Dec. 19, 2023).

Petitioner filed a successor petition seeking to raise a dozen issues. One is a search claim, it is not founded on a new constitutional rule, just that the search was illegal. So dismissed. In re Watson, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 33399 (11th Cir. Dec. 15, 2023).*

Plaintiff plausibly states a Fourth Amendment claim that the officer’s opening his mailbox and looking at his mail is a claim for relief. At least enough to survive a motion to dismiss. Oats v. McHenry Cty., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225630 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 19, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.