OH10: Handing backpack to friend to hold was not abandonment

“However, abandonment for Fourth Amendment purposes differs from abandonment in terms of property law. ‘In the context of search and seizure law, abandonment refers to a manifestation or appearance that the person has no interest in the property, rather than a full divestment of legal interest in the property.’” Defendant did not abandon his backpack when he handed it over to one Owens to hold for him. “Before Officer Nance searched the backpack, he asked Owens whether he knew appellant. Owens responded [per bodycam video] stating ‘[h]e’s my friend … he just asked me to hold the bag.’” He still had standing. State v. Camper, 2023-Ohio-4673, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 4485 (10th Dist. Dec. 21, 2023).

“Defendant received a favorable plea and has not demonstrated ‘the absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations’ for counsel’s alleged shortcomings …. Indeed, the record shows that defendant made a strategic decision to accept the plea offer before County Court issued a ruling on various requests for relief, including suppression of items seized pursuant to a search warrant ….” People v. Shaw, 2023 NY Slip Op 06644, 2023 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6667 (4th Dept. Dec. 22, 2023).*

Defendant claimed ineffective assistance of counsel in his pro se submission for defense counsel’s failure to object at trial to multiple stops of him before the offense in question, one of which was pretextual just to learn his name, because it “usurped the presumption of innocence” by making him look like a drug dealer. This was harmless error on this record. State v. Rainey, 2023-Ohio-4666 (1st Dist. Dec. 22, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Abandonment, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.