Author Archives: Hall

D.N.M.: Three Franks challenges, one successful

Defendant succeeds in his Franks challenge. After a hearing, it was more likely than not that there was a false statement at least recklessly made, and it was material: “For these reasons, the Court finds that the false statement included … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Three Franks challenges, one successful

FL1: Violation of state knock-and-announce statute requires suppression; Hudson not followed

Violation of the state knock-and-announce statute required suppression. Officers entered with haste and didn’t give defendant the chance to surrender peaceably to the search. The statute is a century old, and it serves important privacy interests. The state’s claim that … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Knock and announce, Standing | Comments Off on FL1: Violation of state knock-and-announce statute requires suppression; Hudson not followed

N.D.Ala.: All parts of a SW are read in context, and that narrows it so it’s not overbroad

Defendant seizes on one sentence in the search warrant to contend that it was overbroad. Under Andresen, parts of warrants are read in context. In context, it was not overbroad. United States v. Canaday, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64639 (N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Overbreadth | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: All parts of a SW are read in context, and that narrows it so it’s not overbroad

WA: No immediate bail for DV arrest violates neither 4A nor due process

A no bail arrest for domestic violence until the first appearance violates neither the Fourth Amendment nor due process. State v. Clare, 2024 Wash. App. LEXIS 462 (Mar. 12, 2024). CoA denied. Petitioner doesn’t show that his state Fourth Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Stop and frisk, Waiver | Comments Off on WA: No immediate bail for DV arrest violates neither 4A nor due process

S.D.N.Y.: Overseas seizure of Russian oligarch’s megayacht not governed by 4A

This megayacht was seized overseas for Russia sanctions. (Eduard Yurievich Khudainatov is the owner, and he’s a Russian oligarch who is a Putin proxy (per Forbes)) The claim that the initial seizure may have violated the Fourth Amendment fails because … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches, Forfeiture, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Overseas seizure of Russian oligarch’s megayacht not governed by 4A

CA7: No IAC in failure to more aggressively pursue Franks challenge

Defense counsel acted reasonably in how he pursued defendant’s suppression motion founded on Franks in not arguing more stringently for bad faith. Here, defendant was charged in state court with child pornography. His motion to suppress the search was granted. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA7: No IAC in failure to more aggressively pursue Franks challenge

CA9: Compelled use of fingerprint to open a cell phone didn’t violate 5A

Police forcing defendant parolee to use his fingerprint to open his cell phone was not testimonial under the Fifth Amendment. It was “cognitive exertion” and akin to taking DNA or a blood draw. United States v. Payne, 2024 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on CA9: Compelled use of fingerprint to open a cell phone didn’t violate 5A

CNS: Google to pay $62 million for tracking users without consent

Courthouse News Service: Google to pay $62 million for tracking users without consent by Natalie Hanson (“Google will pay $62 million to numerous nonprofits on behalf of people who say the company violated their constitutional and common law privacy rights … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on CNS: Google to pay $62 million for tracking users without consent

Lawfare: How Google’s Location History Program Could Upend Digital Surveillance Law

Lawfare: How Google’s Location History Program Could Upend Digital Surveillance Law (“Federal courts may eliminate Fourth Amendment protections for cell phone data based on dubious claims about Google’s Location History.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Lawfare: How Google’s Location History Program Could Upend Digital Surveillance Law

CA6 disagrees with CA7 on de minimis injuries under § 1983 force cases

“We end with two disclaimers. As for the first disclaimer, courts have suggested that § 1983 does not provide a cause of action for ‘trifling’ injuries—whether a plaintiff alleges a violation of the First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, or any … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6 disagrees with CA7 on de minimis injuries under § 1983 force cases

MO: No duty of care owed by police to fleeing motorist

There was no duty owed to a fleeing motorist who killed himself and his passenger in flight. The police owed a duty to the rest of the locale to stop them. This was reasonable under Scott. Neil v. St. Louis … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on MO: No duty of care owed by police to fleeing motorist

D.P.R.: Indictment for possession of switches to convert handguns to machine guns justified vehicle search when defendant was stopped

Defendant was indicted for possession of conversion devices to make handguns machine guns. That justified search of his car when he was stopped. United States v. Berríos-Aquino, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66657 (D.P.R. Apr. 4, 2024). The DEA subpoena for … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Protective sweep, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Indictment for possession of switches to convert handguns to machine guns justified vehicle search when defendant was stopped

N.D.Ohio: Heroin and three guns in plain view was exigency for entry with child alone inside

Police knowing that defendant’s 12-year-old son was in the house alone with a significant quantity of heroin and three firearms all in plain view was exigency for entry. There also previous complaints to Family Services. United States v. Woodard, 2024 … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Heroin and three guns in plain view was exigency for entry with child alone inside

S.D.Fla.: SW application redacted for discovery for now

For the time being, the search warrant application is redacted in discovery under Rule 6(e). “First, the Special Counsel opposes the disclosure of a search warrant application for Defendant De Oliveira’s Gmail account …. This includes the search warrant itself, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: SW application redacted for discovery for now

OH2: Police responding to report of shot dog who heard an animal had exigency to enter the curtilage

“Based upon the evidence presented, we conclude the trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress. The search of the home and surrounding premises was reasonable because the officers believed an injured animal was on the premises … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH2: Police responding to report of shot dog who heard an animal had exigency to enter the curtilage

CA4: Court instructing that the legality of searches were questions for the court wasn’t error

Defense counsel asked a question about something being in plain view which led to discussion of whether those words were an effort to challenge the search before the jury. The court instructed the jury that the legality of searches was … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA4: Court instructing that the legality of searches were questions for the court wasn’t error

W.D.N.C.: No REP in a police interview room

There was no reasonable expectation of privacy in a police interview room that was recording defendant without his knowledge. Foster v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65874 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 9, 2024). Defendant can’t raise in his 2255 his Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: No REP in a police interview room

TX2: No SW needed to get IMEI number of an abandoned cell phone to trace the owner

“Officers may open a cell phone abandoned at a crime scene to view non-electronic identifying information, such as the phone’s international mobile equipment identification (IMEI) number, and then use that identifying information to obtain a search warrant for the phone’s … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on TX2: No SW needed to get IMEI number of an abandoned cell phone to trace the owner

W.D.Pa.: Affidavit for SW doesn’t have to say CI was reliable when the facts and circumstances alleged showed it

Defendant’s allegations of the police not saying in the warrant affidavit the CI was reliable doesn’t matter because the affidavit for warrant shows otherwise why the CI was credited. There was probable cause. To the extent this would be considered … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Informant hearsay, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Affidavit for SW doesn’t have to say CI was reliable when the facts and circumstances alleged showed it

S.D.N.Y.: GJ subpoena for cell phone passcode quashed.

The government’s grand jury subpoena for defendant’s cell phone passcode is quashed because it seeks testimonial information in violation of the Fifth Amendment showing defendant’s knowledge of the contents of the phone. “The Court denies Gray’s Rule 41(g) motion. Even … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: GJ subpoena for cell phone passcode quashed.