Author Archives: Hall

CT: Pretrial detainees still have no REP in jail calls

There is no constitutional distinction between pretrial detainees and convicts in a jail for the reasonable expectation of privacy in telephone calls on a jail line phone they knew was recorded. State v. Bember, 2024 Conn. LEXIS 153 (June 25, … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CT: Pretrial detainees still have no REP in jail calls

CA3: Getting ptf’s personal information from third parties after he was seen open carrying was not 2A or 4A violation

Plaintiff was seen open carrying on a bicycle, and the officer attempted to stop him. The officer later got information on plaintiff from a store he’d been in. None of that violated the Second or Fourth Amendment. Glover v. Fidaannd, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA3: Getting ptf’s personal information from third parties after he was seen open carrying was not 2A or 4A violation

CA11: Cotenant’s knowledge of their cotenant being on probation enough to search them, too

“The Supreme Court has said that a warrantless search of a probationer’s home, supported by reasonable suspicion of criminal activity and authorized by a probation condition, is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. See United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA11: Cotenant’s knowledge of their cotenant being on probation enough to search them, too

N.D.Ga.: Questions about drugs without RS unreasonably extended stop

The officer’s questions about drugs during the mission of a routine traffic stop unreasonably extended the stop, and the dog sniff is suppressed. United States v. Chavez, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110229 (N.D. Ga. June 3, 2024). Defendant rented an … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Questions about drugs without RS unreasonably extended stop

S.D.Miss.: Drug SW permitted search of a safe even though not specified

This drug search warrant didn’t mention a safe, but that was a place where they could be found, so the search was proper. Also, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Manning, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109676 (S.D. Miss. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Motion to suppress, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on S.D.Miss.: Drug SW permitted search of a safe even though not specified

CA7: Detention of a package for a day to get SW was reasonable

Detention of a package for a day to get a search warrant was a reasonable time. United States v. Black, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 14944 (7th Cir. June 20, 2024). “‘The Constitution does not guarantee that only the guilty will … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Mail and packages, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA7: Detention of a package for a day to get SW was reasonable

NH: Grounds to sustain a search must be raised before motion to reconsider

Where the state is relying on the “new crime” exception to the exclusionary rule, it needs to raise it before a motion to reconsider or it’s waived. State v. Rousseau, 2024 N.H. LEXIS 125 (June 18, 2024). Defendant’s criminal history … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Particularity, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on NH: Grounds to sustain a search must be raised before motion to reconsider

D.Conn.: Failure to challenge lack of announcement in federal court was futile and not ineffective assistance

“First, Mr. Smith cannot establish prejudice from his attorney failing to raise the alleged violation of the knock-and-announce requirement as ‘the exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence discovered in the ensuing search.’ United States v. Acosta, 502 F.3d 54, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Knock and announce, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Failure to challenge lack of announcement in federal court was futile and not ineffective assistance

VA: 4A exclusionary rule does not apply in a civil zoning case

The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule does not apply in a civil zoning case. Bd. of Supervisors of Fairfax Cty. v. Leach-Lewis, 2024 Va. LEXIS 38 (June 20, 2024). Surveillance of him at a stash house and other information provided probable … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: 4A exclusionary rule does not apply in a civil zoning case

MT: Entry onto def’s rural land past “Posted” and “No Trespassing” signs to issue a traffic citation was unreasonable

Entry onto defendant’s rural land past “Posted” and “No Trespassing” signs to issue a traffic citation was unreasonable. Montanans have a heightened expectation of privacy in their posted rural lands. State v. Lanchantin, 2024 MT 129 (June 18, 2024). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, State constitution, Trespass | Comments Off on MT: Entry onto def’s rural land past “Posted” and “No Trespassing” signs to issue a traffic citation was unreasonable

WI: Community caretaking stop couldn’t be expanded without RS

Where defendant was stopped under the community caretaking function, expanding the stop without further justification was unreasonable. Here, it was because the officer thought defendant may have been driving while sleepy, but the stop was extended. State v. Wiskowski, 2024 … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Custody, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: Community caretaking stop couldn’t be expanded without RS

NYLJ: Geofencing and Individualized Suspicion

NYLJ: Geofencing and Individualized Suspicion (June 24, 2024)

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on NYLJ: Geofencing and Individualized Suspicion

WaPo: Law enforcement is spying on thousands of Americans’ mail, records show

WaPo: Law enforcement is spying on thousands of Americans’ mail, records show by Drew Harwell (“The Postal Service approves thousands of requests every year from police officers and federal agents seeking information from Americans’ letters and packages.”) This is hardly … Continue reading

Posted in Mail and packages | Comments Off on WaPo: Law enforcement is spying on thousands of Americans’ mail, records show

CA5: Exigency is measured objectively, not subjectively

“Borden argues the officers’ actions indicate they did not actually think a medical emergency existed, but their subjective beliefs are irrelevant. See Toussaint, 838 F.3d at 509. Given the totality of the circumstances, a reasonable view of the evidence supports … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA5: Exigency is measured objectively, not subjectively

N.Mar.Isl.: DNA order in probate case complied with 4A

There was sufficient justification for the court to order a DNA test in a probate matter, and the order complied with the Fourth Amendment. In re Est. of Kapileo, 2024 N. Mar. I. LEXIS 4 (Superior Ct. June 18, 2024). … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.Mar.Isl.: DNA order in probate case complied with 4A

CO: When IP address is the PC for a building, SW permits search of whole building

“This case concerns whether a search for Internet-related evidence that extended to a previously unknown basement apartment was reasonable, even though the apartment was not specified in the warrant. The supreme court holds that 1) the warrant’s reference to the … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search, Waiver | Comments Off on CO: When IP address is the PC for a building, SW permits search of whole building

SCOTUS: ““The presence of probable cause for one charge in a criminal proceeding does not categorically defeat a Fourth Amendment malicious-prosecution claim relating to another, baseless charge.”

“The presence of probable cause for one charge in a criminal proceeding does not categorically defeat a Fourth Amendment malicious-prosecution claim relating to another, baseless charge. The parties, and the United States as amicus curiae, all agree with this conclusion, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on SCOTUS: ““The presence of probable cause for one charge in a criminal proceeding does not categorically defeat a Fourth Amendment malicious-prosecution claim relating to another, baseless charge.”

D.Utah: An A-C communication seized that was still in the hands of the taint team was not a 4A or 6A violation

An attorney-client letter was obtained by search warrant and it was isolated by the taint team. Because no case was pending at the time, the Sixth Amendment was not violated, and the dismissal or disqualification is an necessary remedy. United … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Privileges, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Utah: An A-C communication seized that was still in the hands of the taint team was not a 4A or 6A violation

D.P.R.: PR nighttime search rules irrelevant in federal court

Puerto Rico cases on nighttime search aren’t relevant in federal court. United States v. Pastrana-Román, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238527 (D.P.R. March 9, 2023),* adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106442 (D.P.R. May 17, 2024).* Defendant didn’t show good cause for … Continue reading

Posted in Nighttime search, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on D.P.R.: PR nighttime search rules irrelevant in federal court

N.D.Cal.: Defendant succeeds in getting hearing on a Franks challenge

Defendant succeeds in getting hearing on a Franks challenge, making the “substantial preliminary showing.” United States v. Ardis, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106369 (N.D. Cal. June 14, 2024)*: However, the Court does find that defendant has made a substantial preliminary … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Defendant succeeds in getting hearing on a Franks challenge