Author Archives: Hall

W.D.N.Y.: Def wearing a mask to make him harder to identify doesn’t immunize his arrest on a warrant

“Wearing a mask does not immunize a wanted person from a valid arrest warrant. Here, law enforcement properly executed an arrest warrant for Defendant Apprentiace Singletary. Singletary cannot argue that his arrest was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment because he … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Consent, Excessive force | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Def wearing a mask to make him harder to identify doesn’t immunize his arrest on a warrant

N.D.Cal.: No standing in ALPR info of car def didn’t drive

Defendant’s motion to suppress automated license plate reader (ALPR) data on the family car that he didn’t drive is denied for lack of standing. Also, the holder of the information was a third-party contractor. United States v. Butler, 2024 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing, Surveillance technology, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: No standing in ALPR info of car def didn’t drive

MT: RS def was too drunk to drive from description, allegedly crawling to car, then officer talking to him

The citizen informant’s defendant was too drunk to drive because he stumbled and crawled to his car was corroborated by observations and smelling him, so there was at least reasonable suspicion. Defendant’s claim that his bar receipt from inside the … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MT: RS def was too drunk to drive from description, allegedly crawling to car, then officer talking to him

D.Mass.: Passenger putting something under the seat shows no REP

A passenger putting something under the seat when in a car manifests no reasonable expectation of privacy and thus no standing. United States v. Dunnell, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124927 (D. Mass. July 16, 2024). (Apparently one needs to keep … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Passenger putting something under the seat shows no REP

CO: Drunk driving tip line report was not anonymous

A report through a drunk driving tip line was not anonymous. Even if it were, the officer developed reasonable suspicion before the stop. People v. Dacus, 2024 CO 51, 2024 Colo. LEXIS 565 (June 24, 2024).* Defendant’s arrest on a … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CO: Drunk driving tip line report was not anonymous

E.D.Pa.: Exposure to Covid-19 in prison doesn’t state a 4A or 8A claim

Exposure to Covid-19 in prison didn’t state a Fourth or Eighth Amendment claim. Dingle v. Tommage, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124710 (E.D. Pa. July 16, 2024). Defendant was driving with a suspended license, and WVSP protocol dictated impoundment of the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Inventory, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Exposure to Covid-19 in prison doesn’t state a 4A or 8A claim

D.Md.: Review of PC isn’t as skeptical as def requests

“Here, the affidavit easily meets the standard of probable cause. Defendants would require a level of skepticism that is not appropriate to the oversight at this juncture. The scheme to defraud was amply established by the affiant and so was … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.Md.: Review of PC isn’t as skeptical as def requests

NM: 19-day delay getting a SW for a computer was reasonable considering the diminished possessory interest in it

“The district court concluded, after weighing Defendant’s diminished possessory interest in the tablet and the legitimate interests of law enforcement, that under the circumstances, the nineteen-day delay between when the tablet was seized and when a search warrant was obtained … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NM: 19-day delay getting a SW for a computer was reasonable considering the diminished possessory interest in it

Reason: Internet Preservation and the Fourth Amendment—Case Updates, Part I

Reason, The Volokh Conspiracy: Internet Preservation and the Fourth Amendment—Case Updates, Part I by Orin S. Kerr (“The first of two rulings, and why I find it unpersuasive.”):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Social media warrants | Comments Off on Reason: Internet Preservation and the Fourth Amendment—Case Updates, Part I

OH4: Waiting for backup was prudent for delaying dog sniff even though there was no RS

With a late night stop of a person that had a drug history and the officer was outnumbered, it was prudent to call for backup before the dog sniff, and the total elapsed time wasn’t that much. The court of … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH4: Waiting for backup was prudent for delaying dog sniff even though there was no RS

CA3: No per se irreparable injury from 4A violation

The Third Circuit does not find per se irreparable injury from a Fourth Amendment violation, recognizing a conflict in the circuits. Del. State Sportsmen’s Ass’n v. Del. Dep’t of Safety & Homeland Sec., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 17214 (3d Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA3: No per se irreparable injury from 4A violation

WA: Using software to search a cell phone doesn’t violate particularity

Use of software to search a cell phone did not violate the particularity of the warrant. The Fourth Amendment and the state constitution are intended to prevent a general rummaging, and the use of software facilitates people not looking at … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Informant hearsay, Particularity | Comments Off on WA: Using software to search a cell phone doesn’t violate particularity

UT: Def satisfied “shocking the conscience” standard for recording a telephone call while under a protective order and he couldn’t fully respond

The court finds officers baiting defendant into a recorded phone call where he was under a protective order and could not adequately respond “shocked the conscience” and would be suppressed. State v. Lewis, 2024 UT App 96, 2024 Utah App. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, State constitution | Comments Off on UT: Def satisfied “shocking the conscience” standard for recording a telephone call while under a protective order and he couldn’t fully respond

D.Md.: Asking a person to be frisked what’s on him can’t be used to justify the frisk

Asking a person about whether he has anything on him about sharp objects is reasonable and related to the frisk. Any admission cannot, however, be used to justify the frisk. United States v. Freeman, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123297 (D. … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Md.: Asking a person to be frisked what’s on him can’t be used to justify the frisk

M.D.La.: Strip searches in investigative stops is enjoined

The Baton Rouge PD’s strip search policy of detainees in an investigative stop on less than probable cause is enjoined. “[T]he Court finds that, for any search beyond a frisk or pat-down of a citizen stopped pursuant to an investigatory … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Strip search | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Strip searches in investigative stops is enjoined

LA4: Being seen in a “drug hot spot” adds nothing to RS

Being seen in NOLA “drug hot spots” doesn’t add anything to reasonable suspicion. Suppression affirmed. State v. Tate, 2024 La. App. LEXIS 1107 (La. App. 4 Cir. July 11, 2024). The complainant’s telling the police of being drugged for sex … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA4: Being seen in a “drug hot spot” adds nothing to RS

CA2: Excessive force claims are new under Bivens and can’t be brought

Excessive force claims are new for Bivens, and rejected. Here, it was his restraint in a courtroom by US Marshals and CSOs. Edwards v. Gizzi, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 17100 (2d Cir. July 12, 2024). Plaintiff was shot in the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: Excessive force claims are new under Bivens and can’t be brought

TX10: Even if def’s CSLI was erroneously admitted at trial, it was harmless

Even if defendant’s CSLI was erroneously admitted at trial, it was harmless on this record. State v. Roberts, 2024 Tex. App. LEXIS 4847 (Tex. App. – Waco July 11, 2024). Leave to file a successor 2255 denied. The Fourth Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX10: Even if def’s CSLI was erroneously admitted at trial, it was harmless

CA11: No co-conspirator standing in two cars

Here there were two vehicles stopped. Defendant was a passenger in one, and he had no standing in either merely being a co-conspirator to a drug operation. United States v. Lewis, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 16803 (11th Cir. July 10, … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: No co-conspirator standing in two cars

E.D.N.C.: Military command authorized search for CP on electronics was valid; listing IP addresses of devices not required

Defendant was in the Marine Corps and a Command Authorized Search and Seizure (CASS) for his electronic devices was executed for child pornography. It was sufficiently particular to satisfy the Fourth Amendment. “In this case, the challenged warrant did not … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Military searches, Particularity, Pretext | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Military command authorized search for CP on electronics was valid; listing IP addresses of devices not required