E.D.N.C.: Military command authorized search for CP on electronics was valid; listing IP addresses of devices not required

Defendant was in the Marine Corps and a Command Authorized Search and Seizure (CASS) for his electronic devices was executed for child pornography. It was sufficiently particular to satisfy the Fourth Amendment. “In this case, the challenged warrant did not have to ‘delineate each and every’ device by their assigned IP addresses because searching all of the devices was a reasonable investigative measure based on the nature of the suspected offenses.” The CASS search could be used in federal court. United States v. Fritzinger, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120570 (E.D.N.C. July 10, 2024).

Defendant was stopped by a park ranger for a tag violation. That led to seeing marijuana in the car door, and that led to finding meth. It was valid under the automobile exception. United States v. Perkins, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 17022 (5th Cir. July 11, 2024).*

“The Court finds Detective Michaud’s testimony credible. Thus, regardless of whether law enforcement officers subjectively hoped to find evidence of other crimes, Detective Michaud observed a traffic violation. Therefore, the initial traffic stop was reasonable for purposes of analysis under the Fourth Amendment.” United States v. Riley, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122001 (D.S.C. July 11, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Military searches, Particularity, Pretext. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.