Author Archives: Hall

E.D.La.: RS def was armed in a NOLA firearms free zone

The officer had reasonable suspicion defendant was armed, but also in a firearm-free zone during Mardi Gras which was reasonably determined. United States v. Bryant, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62869 (E.D. La. Mar. 25, 2026).* 2255 petitioner’s guilty plea waived … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.La.: RS def was armed in a NOLA firearms free zone

N.D.Ind.: Police arriving during ongoing 911 call justified entry on exigency

Officers arrived at the house the subject of an open 911 call during the emergency, and that authorized entry. United States v. Bray, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63142 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 25, 2026).* The court can’t tell from the body … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Police arriving during ongoing 911 call justified entry on exigency

CA9: 48-hour delay in getting a warrant for a mailed package wasn’t unreasonable

A 48 hour delay in getting a warrant for a mailed package wasn’t unreasonable. United States v. Garza, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 8714 (9th Cir. Mar. 25, 2026). Petitioner’s bank records were obtained by search warrant. They are third party … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Issue preclusion, Mail and packages, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA9: 48-hour delay in getting a warrant for a mailed package wasn’t unreasonable

W.D.N.Y.: Def had standing in his work premises under Mancusi v. Deforte

Defendant had standing in his work premises under Mancusi v. Deforte. On the merits his Franks challenge fails: “Even assuming arguendo that any of the above challenged statements could be considered false or misleading, Defendants have put forth no credible … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Def had standing in his work premises under Mancusi v. Deforte

D.S.D.: The fact a protective sweep came up empty doesn’t mean it wasn’t justified

“The court finds that the government has met its burden of demonstrating that the protective sweep exception to the warrant requirement applies. Before the protective sweep, officers received reports that someone matching Mr. Day’s physical description and alias was threatening … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.D.: The fact a protective sweep came up empty doesn’t mean it wasn’t justified

NPR: Your data is everywhere. The government is buying it without a warrant

NPR: Your data is everywhere. The government is buying it without a warrant by Jude Joffe-Block:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NPR: Your data is everywhere. The government is buying it without a warrant

N.D.W.Va.: Bare allegations of a Franks violation without a significant offer of proof is conjecture

Bare allegations of a Franks violation without a significant offer of proof is conjecture. Kokinda v. Foster, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60028 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 23, 2026).* Exigent circumstances justified the seizure of defendant’s cell phone, not just plain view, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: Bare allegations of a Franks violation without a significant offer of proof is conjecture

E.D.Mo.: Ubiquity of cell phones here satisfied nexus without stating it

This is about a search warrant issued in an arson investigation and defendant’s claim of lack of nexus. The ubiquity of cell phones means that the officers did not even have to state that they knew defendant had one. United … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Private search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Ubiquity of cell phones here satisfied nexus without stating it

C.D.Cal.: Bivens not extended to ICE workplace arrest

Bivens will not be extended to an ICE workplace arrest, per Egbert. Hernandez v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61367 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2026):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Bivens not extended to ICE workplace arrest

D.N.M.: 4A question for appeal significant enough to require bail pending appeal

Defendant’s search and seizure question for appeal on the independent source doctrine is significant enough to grant him release pending appeal. United States v. Haack, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60440 (D.N.M. Mar. 20, 2026). The state’s justifications for reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: 4A question for appeal significant enough to require bail pending appeal

RI: Trial stipulation DNA on blanket was def’s obviates search claim

Defendant wasn’t prejudiced by defense counsel not moving to suppress DNA off a blanket found on a road when he’d stipulated to it being his DNA. [There’s also an obvious abandonment issue not even mentioned.] Tassone v. State, 2026 R.I. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, DNA, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Nexus | Comments Off on RI: Trial stipulation DNA on blanket was def’s obviates search claim

D.N.D.: ALPR not a search

ALPR not a search. United States v. Lawrence, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56945 (D.N.D. Mar. 18, 2026). Failure to show materiality for Franks requires the court to also consider the elements of the crime being investigated. United States v. Engler, … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Burden of pleading, Custody, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.N.D.: ALPR not a search

D.Haw.: No constitutional right to an “adequate police investigation”

There is no constitutional right to an “adequate police investigation.” Hawkes v. Katayama, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59452 (D. Haw. Mar. 19, 2026):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on D.Haw.: No constitutional right to an “adequate police investigation”

Cal.4: Ordering def out of house to arrest at gunpoint on RS unreasonable

Arresting defendant in his house but from outside with guns drawn and ordering him out on only reasonable suspicion was unreasonable. Where the arrestee is controls, not the officers. People v. Perez, 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 176 (4th Dist. Mar. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Waiver | Comments Off on Cal.4: Ordering def out of house to arrest at gunpoint on RS unreasonable

D.N.M.: Climbing over a locked gate to do a knock-and-talk violated curtilage, but QI applies

Climbing over a locked gate to do a knock-and-talk violated curtilage, but qualified immunity applies because the law isn’t clearly established. Dotson v. Acord, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57749 (D.N.M. Mar. 19, 2026). Plaintiff runs a wildlife rehab place, and … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Qualified immunity, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Climbing over a locked gate to do a knock-and-talk violated curtilage, but QI applies

DE: Lack of binding authority for 5A cell phone thumbprint claim means it’s denied

Trial counsel didn’t challenge the use of defendant’s thumbprint to access his cell phone, acknowledging case law against it being testimonial. “It does not appear that either this Court or the United States Supreme Court has addressed the issue. Nor … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on DE: Lack of binding authority for 5A cell phone thumbprint claim means it’s denied

Cal.6: Community caretaking function can’t apply just to keep unlicensed driver from driving

“In this appeal, we examine the application of the Fourth Amendment’s community caretaking doctrine to vehicle impoundment. We consider whether a police officer’s decision to impound a driver’s vehicle pursuant to the Vehicle Code solely to prevent further illegal [unlicensed] … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Standing | Comments Off on Cal.6: Community caretaking function can’t apply just to keep unlicensed driver from driving

DC: Officer’s unreasonable mistake of law did not make the stop reasonable under Heien

The officer’s unreasonable mistake of law on windshield tint (“can’t have tint at all” v. it can have some) did not make the stop reasonable under Heien. Griffin v. United States, 2026 D.C. App. LEXIS 95 (Mar. 19, 2026). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on DC: Officer’s unreasonable mistake of law did not make the stop reasonable under Heien

MD: Waiting 20 days to get cell phone SW after seizure was reasonable here

Police seized defendant’s cell phone and sought to have it examined. It went into the queue at the forensic unit, and, when it was ready to be searched, they then sought a warrant. They waited because they believed there was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MD: Waiting 20 days to get cell phone SW after seizure was reasonable here

Treatise 25% off through 3/22

go here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Treatise 25% off through 3/22