Monthly Archives: April 2026

E.D.Mich.: Possible 5A violation in obtaining cell phone passcode mooted by inevitable discovery; they’d get into it anyway

The government obtained defendant’s cell phone passcode by questioning him. Despite the potential Fifth Amendment violation, the court finds that the cell phone would have been opened by the government’s forensics team anyway, so inevitable discovery applies. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, immigration stops, Pretext, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Possible 5A violation in obtaining cell phone passcode mooted by inevitable discovery; they’d get into it anyway

CA3: Cell phone warrant for CSAM could be broad because of possible hiding and misidentifying files

This CSAM cell phone warrant was broad, but that’s a recognition that files could have false names to hide them. It was not unreasonable. United States v. Daniels, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11323 (3d Cir. Apr. 21, 2026):

Posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on CA3: Cell phone warrant for CSAM could be broad because of possible hiding and misidentifying files

DC: Affidavit for SW for cell phone showed no PC or nexus to crime

The search warrant for defendant’s phone showed nothing about probable cause to believe any evidence would be on it. The mere fact he likely carried the phone with him all the time isn’t enough. (But the court concedes maybe it’s … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on DC: Affidavit for SW for cell phone showed no PC or nexus to crime

MS: Def consented to entry to look for his missing mother

Police entry onto defendant’s house and yard because his mother, who he lived with, was missing, and relatives called the police. After looking in the house for her, they found her decapitated in the back yard, then they got a … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: Def consented to entry to look for his missing mother

N.D.Cal.: Detailed collection of video viewing information survives motion to dismiss

Plaintiff alleged a privacy interest in video viewing information where defendant “collected detailed video viewing information to package individuals into audiences based, for example, on their political leanings because they watched the State of the Union, or ‘liberal affinity news,’ … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Detailed collection of video viewing information survives motion to dismiss

N.D.Ga.: OnStar’s data collection survives motion to dismiss, at least for now

In a case over OnStar’s data collection of driving information, GM’s motion to dismiss at this stage of the litigation is denied. While there is no reasonable expectation of privacy of what is seen on the highways, more is involved … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: OnStar’s data collection survives motion to dismiss, at least for now

MA: Two isolated controlled buys 20 days before SW issued were stale

The officer’s false statement he was present for a third controlled buy satisfied Franks and was excised. Defense counsel showed that it couldn’t have happened. The remainder says two controlled buys, and these were found to be isolated transactions, the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Nexus, Search incident, Staleness | Comments Off on MA: Two isolated controlled buys 20 days before SW issued were stale

CA6: Calling def a “fugitive” in the warrant affidavit wasn’t a Franks violation

The use of the word “fugitive” to describe defendant wasn’t shown to be a Franks violation. He insisted he wasn’t a fugitive. It wasn’t shown to be reckless or knowing. United States v. Brown, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11017 (6th … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Calling def a “fugitive” in the warrant affidavit wasn’t a Franks violation

SCOTUS: Call about suspicious vehicle led to passengers’ flight and bad driving, and that was RS for a stop

The officer had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant because, already on alert from the late-night dispatch call about a suspicious vehicle, the officer observed every person in defendant’s car respond strangely to an approaching police car as two passengers took … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Call about suspicious vehicle led to passengers’ flight and bad driving, and that was RS for a stop

VA: 12 second question about drugs didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop that was going to take a while anyway

This was a traffic stop, and defendant had a suspended license. She was able to call her son to come to drive her and the car home, and she would not be arrested. The officer’s taking 12 seconds to ask … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: 12 second question about drugs didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop that was going to take a while anyway

E.D.Tenn.: Application for SW was considered in detention ruling

Here, the application for the search warrant was considered on the detention question. No motion to suppress yet filed (or would one be?). United States v. Evans, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31755 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 17, 2026). Defendant’s valid stop … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Application for SW was considered in detention ruling

TN: RS didn’t develop to continue stop; second stop based on first suppressed

Defendant was subjected to two stops. The first was for suspicion of disorderly conduct, but no arrest was made and he was released because no further reasonable suspicion developed. A second stop was based on the first, and there still … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: RS didn’t develop to continue stop; second stop based on first suppressed

CA4: Traffic stop immediately became firearms investigation; suppressed

The officer immediately launching into an inquiry about firearms during a traffic stop violated Rodriguez. United States v. Martin, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10979 (4th Cir. Apr. 17, 2026):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Traffic stop immediately became firearms investigation; suppressed

CA10: Disagreement over spelling of street name didn’t make warrant fail particularity; GFE at least would apply

“The warrant authorized a search of 10 McGinnis Street, Eufaula, OK 74432. The correct address, Mr. Davis said, was 10 Meginnis Street, Eufaula, OK 74432. And beyond the address, the warrant contained no description of the house.” The suppression hearing … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Particularity, Protective sweep, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA10: Disagreement over spelling of street name didn’t make warrant fail particularity; GFE at least would apply

VA: Statutory requirement to provide SW papers only applies to “places of abode”

Defendant sold drugs in a store in a controlled buy. The statute on providing a warrant and affidavit to the occupant only applies to places of abode. Blow v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. LEXIS 29 (Apr. 16, 2026). A narcotics officer … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on VA: Statutory requirement to provide SW papers only applies to “places of abode”

D.Idaho: Not unreasonable for PO to hand over def’s cell phone to LEO for extraction after RS developed from Snapchat app

Defendant missed a PO visit, and they went to his house. There, they got his cell phone and looked at his Snapchat app finding messages between him and a 14 year old. It was not unreasonable for them to hand … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Cell phones, Community caretaking function, Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Not unreasonable for PO to hand over def’s cell phone to LEO for extraction after RS developed from Snapchat app

AtL: Sotomayor Apologizes For Possibly Hurting Kavanaugh’s Feelings Over The Racial Profiling He Invented

Above the Law: Sotomayor Apologizes For Possibly Hurting Kavanaugh’s Feelings Over The Racial Profiling He Invented by Joe Patrice

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on AtL: Sotomayor Apologizes For Possibly Hurting Kavanaugh’s Feelings Over The Racial Profiling He Invented

MN: Geofence warrant was not particular

The Minnesota Constitution doesn’t categorically prohibit geofence warrants, but here the warrant was not particular as to all those swept up. Reversed and remanded to the court of appeals (rev’g State v. Contreras-Sanchez, 5 N.W.3d 151 (Minn. App. 2024)). State … Continue reading

Posted in geofence, Particularity | Comments Off on MN: Geofence warrant was not particular

IA: Bodycam and dashcam videos undermined claim of plain view

The bodycam and dashcam videos show that the officer could not have made the plain view he claims he did of a portion of a gallon-sized Ziplock bag in defendant’s waistband. A clear video can even undermine trial court credibility … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on IA: Bodycam and dashcam videos undermined claim of plain view

MA: Waiting 24 hours after the alleged traffic violation to make a stop was unreasonable

Waiting 24 hours after the alleged traffic violation to make a stop was unreasonable under the state constitution. Commonwealth v. Arias, 2026 Mass. LEXIS 161 (Apr. 15, 2026):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on MA: Waiting 24 hours after the alleged traffic violation to make a stop was unreasonable