MS: Def consented to entry to look for his missing mother

Police entry onto defendant’s house and yard because his mother, who he live with, was missing, and relatives called the police. After looking in the house for her, they found her decapitated in the back yard, then they got a search warrant. The initial entry was based on consent shown on bodycam. He knew of his right to refuse because he first asked about a warrant and then agreed. Inevitable discovery also applied because they were about to find her body in the back yard. (His insanity defense was rejected by the jury.) Johnson v. State, 2026 Miss. LEXIS 110 (Apr. 23, 2026).*

Plaintiff was a BLM protestor shot with a pepperball while peacefully protesting. Plaintiff’s excessive force verdict affirmed. Epps v. Christian, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11265 (10th Cir. Apr. 21, 2026).*

The trial court held that defendant’s DMV information wasn’t private, despite the stop, but it didn’t decide whether there was justification for the stop. Remanded for that. People v. Ehinmiakhena, 2026 NY Slip Op 02363, 2026 N.Y. LEXIS 532 (Apr. 21, 2026).*

There was reasonable suspicion for continuing this stop because the car had left a known drug house where a passenger got in with a bag from the house, they were driving to another drug house, the passengers were extremely nervous, and there was a search warrant out for one of the passengers. United States v. Lundholm, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11267 (9th Cir. Apr. 21, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Excessive force, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.