CA6: Calling def a “fugitive” in the warrant affidavit wasn’t a Franks violation

The use of the word “fugitive” to describe defendant wasn’t shown to be a Franks violation. He insisted he wasn’t a fugitive. It wasn’t shown to be reckless or knowing. United States v. Brown, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11017 (6th Cir. Apr. 17, 2026).*

Defendant’s stop was with reasonable suspicion. The warrant for his house was based on a CI whose information was corroborated. United States v. Sheehan, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11013 (6th Cir. Apr. 17, 2026).*

“Even if Officer Tapia’s act of opening the door constituted a Fourth Amendment violation, suppression would not be warranted because the challenged evidence was discovered through an independent source:” plain view. United States v. Aguirre, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11090 (9th Cir. Apr. 20, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Independent source, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.