Monthly Archives: December 2022

NE: Police don’t have to decide the constitutionality of the laws they enforce

Police officers are not legal scholars, and they don’t have to guess as to the constitutionality of the laws they enforced. They need only act reasonably in reliance on statute or ordinance. State v. Albarenga, 313 Neb. 72 (Dec. 23, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NE: Police don’t have to decide the constitutionality of the laws they enforce

N.D.Ill.: PC for admin. warrant became stale before it was sought

This administrative search warrant under OSHA became stale by the government’s delay in seeking it and litigation delays. Also, USMJs have jurisdiction to issue administrative inspection warrants. F.R.C.P. 72 objections do not apply to administrative warrants because they frustrate enforcement … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: PC for admin. warrant became stale before it was sought

MD: RS is based on an objective test

“[T]he totality of the circumstances assessment to determine the existence of reasonable articulable suspicion is and remains an objective test.” Flight can also be consistent with innocence. Washington v. State, 2022 Md. LEXIS 524 (Dec. 19, 2022). Reasonable suspicion developed … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MD: RS is based on an objective test

NJ: Opening a car door is a search

Opening a car door is a search. State v. Gray, 2022 N.J. Super. LEXIS 144 (Dec. 20, 2022). “In sum, the Court finds it is clear that Officer Spain’s purpose in opening Defendant’s door and asking him to step out … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Search | Comments Off on NJ: Opening a car door is a search

W.D.Va.: This was a “well-tuned and correct” hunch by the officer, but it wasn’t RS

Ultimately there was not reasonable suspicion on the totality. It was essentially a “well-tuned and correct” hunch. Many—but not all—of the remaining reasonable suspicion factors bear a close resemblance to those presented, but ultimately rejected, in United States v. Bowman, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: This was a “well-tuned and correct” hunch by the officer, but it wasn’t RS

CA7: Pro se letter to court to preserve search claim wasn’t conditional plea

Defendant pled to the indictment, having written a letter to the court that he wanted to preserve his search claim. His pro se letter did not satisfy the conditional plea rule. United States v. Turner, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 35476 … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA7: Pro se letter to court to preserve search claim wasn’t conditional plea

NY1: When state doesn’t challenge standing, it’s taken as conceded

When the state doesn’t challenge standing, it’s taken as conceded. The trial court thus erred in deciding standing. People v. Bonilla, 2022 NY Slip Op 07304, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7136 (1st Dept. Dec. 22, 2022). Defendant had his … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on NY1: When state doesn’t challenge standing, it’s taken as conceded

OH: The fact a cell phone was found at the scene of a car crash gives no PC to search it for evidence of distracted driving merely by its presence

The fact a cell phone was found at the scene of a car crash gives no probable cause to search it for evidence of distracted driving merely by its presence. “[*P1] In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH: The fact a cell phone was found at the scene of a car crash gives no PC to search it for evidence of distracted driving merely by its presence

The Conversation: Not Big Brother, but close: a surveillance expert explains some of the ways we’re all being watched, all the time

The Conversation: Not Big Brother, but close: a surveillance expert explains some of the ways we’re all being watched, all the time (“Nearly ten years on, surveillance technologies permeate all aspects of our lives. They collect swathes of data from … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Conversation: Not Big Brother, but close: a surveillance expert explains some of the ways we’re all being watched, all the time

WI: When statute or ordinance on which search was based is challenged, AG or city must be present

When challenging the constitutionality of an ordinance or statute as making a search and seizure unreasonable, defendant must join the city or notify the AG to participate. Without it, that’s waiver. “Because Raddemann has not shown compliance with Wis. Stat. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Waiver | Comments Off on WI: When statute or ordinance on which search was based is challenged, AG or city must be present

N.D.Cal.: Attic apt and treehouse not specified in SW, but searches there still reasonable

An attic apartment and a treehouse were not specifically within the terms of the warrant, but the search was still reasonable. United States v. Ayala, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227976 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2022). Defendant didn’t timely challenge his … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Attic apt and treehouse not specified in SW, but searches there still reasonable

NYLJ: Geofence Warrants, January 6 and the Fourth Amendment

NYLJ Law.com: Geofence Warrants, January 6 and the Fourth Amendment (“Recently, litigation in several of the January 6th cases has disclosed the extensive use of this geofence search warrants. The Fourth Amendment implications raised by the use of this new investigative tool … Continue reading

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on NYLJ: Geofence Warrants, January 6 and the Fourth Amendment

M.D.Fla.: 14 years of emails in a complicated tax fraud scheme wasn’t overbroad

Fourteen years worth of emails wasn’t overbroad here. “The case involves a complex tax evasion scheme taking place over many years and across international borders. A wide variety of documents would be relevant to prove this scheme. The warrant in … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Neutral and detached magistrate, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: 14 years of emails in a complicated tax fraud scheme wasn’t overbroad

OR: Even constitutional challenges need to be preserved below

Even constitutional challenges need to be preserved below. Jimenez v. Dep’t of Revenue, 370 Or. 543 (Dec. 15, 2022). The court does not find the officer’s testimony credible. He claimed he saw defendant with binoculars from 100′ away buying liquor … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on OR: Even constitutional challenges need to be preserved below

CA6: 4A generally doesn’t apply to sentencing enhancements

“The Fourth Amendment does not apply to sentencing enhancements. … We have recognized a possible exception to this rule—when officers illegally seized the evidence for the very purpose of enhancing the defendant’s sentence—but Wyse makes no such allegation.” United States … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on CA6: 4A generally doesn’t apply to sentencing enhancements

DC: “Handcuffing is ordinarily improper in a Terry stop absent an objective safety concern.”

“Handcuffing is ordinarily improper in a Terry stop absent an objective safety concern. See United States v. Smith, 373 F. Supp. 3d 223, 241 (D.D.C. 2019); Haynes v. Minnehan, 14 F.4th 830, 835 n.4 (8th Cir. 2021) (‘[A]bsent an objective … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident, State constitution | Comments Off on DC: “Handcuffing is ordinarily improper in a Terry stop absent an objective safety concern.”

Reason: How Body-Worn Cameras Are Changing Fourth Amendment Law

Reason: How Body-Worn Cameras Are Changing Fourth Amendment Law by Orin Kerr (“A subtle change, but a real one.”):

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on Reason: How Body-Worn Cameras Are Changing Fourth Amendment Law

CA8: SW in CP case can include whole house, not just def’s room

In a child pornography case, the search warrant need not be limited to only defendant’s room. It can be the whole house. United States v. Schave, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 34757 (8th Cir. Dec. 16, 2022). Officers got a warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA8: SW in CP case can include whole house, not just def’s room

OR: SW omitted apt. no. but affidavit had it; they both were present at the search and that was sufficient

The affidavit for this warrant mentioned only defendant’s apartment building. The affidavit mentioned the apartment number. “The warrant did not incorporate or otherwise reference the affidavit and did not identify defendant by name. Green testified that the omission was an … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on OR: SW omitted apt. no. but affidavit had it; they both were present at the search and that was sufficient

D.Ariz.: No REP in CP; AOL did a private search sending to NCMEC

AOL reported potential child porn to NCMEC, and that was within its terms of service. That was a private search. Moreover, “[t]his Court concludes that society has decided the interest in ‘privately’ possessing child pornography is illegitimate. Opening the image … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: No REP in CP; AOL did a private search sending to NCMEC