Category Archives: Reasonableness

ID: Extraterritorial arrest doesn’t violate state constitution

An extraterritorial arrest does not violate the search and seizure provision of the state constitution, like it doesn’t under the Fourth Amendment. The remedies for statutory violations aren’t in the exclusionary rule. State v. Satterfield, 2025 Ida. App. LEXIS 37 … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Independent source, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, State constitution | Comments Off on ID: Extraterritorial arrest doesn’t violate state constitution

CA3: Incidental conversation during a traffic stop about def’s watch and job didn’t unreasonably extend the stop

Incidental conversation during a traffic stop about defendant’s watch and job didn’t unreasonably extend the stop. United States v. Ross, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 21097 (3d Cir. Aug. 19, 2025):

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA3: Incidental conversation during a traffic stop about def’s watch and job didn’t unreasonably extend the stop

D.Mont.: Asking driver during traffic stop about probationary status not unreasonable

During this traffic stop, the officer asked defendant about his probationary status, and this did not unreasonably extend the stop. It relates to officer safety. United States v. Malloy, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159841 (D. Mont. Aug. 18, 2025):

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Asking driver during traffic stop about probationary status not unreasonable

CA4: Dog sniff at apt. door here violated no REP

A dog sniff at defendant’s apartment door in a multi-unit complex didn’t violate any reasonable expectation of privacy. (Two unpublished cases in this circuit said that; this one’s published.) United States v. Johnson, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 19648 (4th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness, Search incident | Comments Off on CA4: Dog sniff at apt. door here violated no REP

CA8 denies en banc 9-2 on a Rodriguez issue

The Eighth Circuit denies rehearing en banc in a Rodriguez case [remember Rodriguez came from the Eighth Circuit] with two dissenters: United States v. Puckett, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 19064 (8th Cir. July 29, 2025), Grasz with Kelly dissenting:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA8 denies en banc 9-2 on a Rodriguez issue

D.Conn.: Despite officers’ not thinking there was apparent authority to consent, the consenter did have that authority

“The Court recognizes that Officer Nunez and a female officer expressed ambivalence as to whether N.H. could consent to a search when she was not the registered owner of the Camry.” Still, she had apparent authority to consent. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Despite officers’ not thinking there was apparent authority to consent, the consenter did have that authority

WA: Probation searches don’t violate WA Const.

Probation searches are a codified exception to the warrant requirement and not in violation of the Washington constitution. State v. Smith, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 1418 (July 21, 2025). Leaving defendant’s vehicle on a parking lot potentially for days was … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Reasonableness, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: Probation searches don’t violate WA Const.

N.D.Ga.: No REP in a prison inmate’s cell phone

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the use of a cell phone in prison. United States v. Brandt, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129412 (N.D. Ga. June 13, 2025). This line in defendant’s PSR leads to denial of his … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness, Standards of review | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: No REP in a prison inmate’s cell phone

CO: Three-day delay between seizure of defendant’s car and getting SW for it was reasonable

Three-day delay between seizure of defendant’s car and getting a warrant to search was reasonable. People v. Mills, 2025 CO 47, 2025 Colo. LEXIS 572 (June 30, 2025). Defendant’s cell phone was linked to his prostitution/human trafficking case, so there … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CO: Three-day delay between seizure of defendant’s car and getting SW for it was reasonable

D.P.R.: Nexus to CSLI would show who had the phone to connect it to crime

Defendant had standing to contest a search of this cell phone. While he didn’t attach an affidavit, the motion and other papers say it’s his, as does the consent form. Nothing suggests it’s not. The police got a warrant out … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Nexus, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Nexus to CSLI would show who had the phone to connect it to crime

S.D.Tex.: Judge shopping SW request noted, and denied again

It appears to this USMJ that the government is judge shopping. After denial of a warrant request, the government reapplied which was first assigned to another USMJ who transferred it here. Rejected again for the same reason. Defect not cured. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Judge shopping SW request noted, and denied again

CA8: In a consent search of a car, picking up cell phone and seeing lit screen wasn’t an unreasonable search

“Did Trooper Rorie’s 20 seconds of questioning and request for consent prolong the stop beyond the time needed to complete the remaining tasks of the traffic stop? We hold that it did not. The brief duration of the inquiry within … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Reasonableness, Search, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA8: In a consent search of a car, picking up cell phone and seeing lit screen wasn’t an unreasonable search

S.D.W.Va.: Paying “rent” in drugs is a business transaction didn’t give a REP here

Paying daily “rent” in drugs is a business transaction without standing. “Although Jackson was an overnight guest insofar as he slept on the couch in the living room, he told law enforcement officers in his interview that he paid McCallister … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Paying “rent” in drugs is a business transaction didn’t give a REP here

D.N.J.: Franks motion fails where a warrant exception applies

Defendant’s Franks motion fails because the government can justify a warrantless search of the vehicle under the automobile exception. United States v. Childs, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101370 (D.N.J. May 28, 2025). Plaintiff’s false arrest claim isn’t barred by Heck, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Franks motion fails where a warrant exception applies

FL1: Judge issuing SW not barred from presiding over trial

Reviewing search warrant applications is a core function of a judicial officer, and that does not qualify as an improper ex parte communication requiring the trial judge to recuse. Writ of prohibition denied. Adelson v. State, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on FL1: Judge issuing SW not barred from presiding over trial

D.Alaska: Despite SW affidavit’s failures, search of car otherwise valid under automobile exception

The showing for the search warrant for defendant’s car and cell phone was completely deficient. As to the car, its search is sustained under the automobile exception instead, but the phone extraction is suppressed. United States v. Carlton, 2025 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Despite SW affidavit’s failures, search of car otherwise valid under automobile exception

E.D.Ky.: SW affidavit failed to show PC for search of house, but it wasn’t so lacking the GFE doesn’t apply

The affidavit for search warrant here was based on suspicious circumstances but doesn’t show nexus to defendant’s house that he was engaging in drug trafficking from there just from living there. “Ultimately, the evidence in the affidavit did not create … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: SW affidavit failed to show PC for search of house, but it wasn’t so lacking the GFE doesn’t apply

D.Neb.: Officer asking same question three different ways didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop

Asking the same question of defendant a different way three times while doing the traffic citation did not unreasonably prolong the stop. The officer said he was not trying to be “robotic” sounding. United States v. Burns, 2025 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Officer asking same question three different ways didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop

D.P.R.: Officers’ reliance on differing versions of weapons law was objectively reasonable

The Spanish and English versions of a section of the Puerto Rico Weapons Law differ with “and” and “or” and reliance on whichever is objectively reasonable under Heien. United States v. Rosa-Ufred, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49334 (D.P.R. Mar. 14, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Officers’ reliance on differing versions of weapons law was objectively reasonable

WA: There was an objective basis for this stop even if with pretext

There was an objective basis for defendant’s stop, even if the officer had subjective motives. State v. Olson, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 423 (Mar. 11, 2025).* Defendant was in prison for about 20 years and there were phone calls between … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on WA: There was an objective basis for this stop even if with pretext