IN: No REP in bank records in securities investigation

The state securities department subpoenaed petitioner’s bank records. He has no privacy interest in them under the Fourth or Fifth Amendment. Peabody v. State Office of the Sec’y of State Sec. Div., 2025 Ind. App. LEXIS 328 (Oct. 3, 2025).

“Even if the officer is ultimately incorrect about whether the traffic infraction occurred, a mistaken but reasonable belief does not violate the Fourth Amendment ….” The stop here was reasonable. Thompson v. Wilshire, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 196482 (S.D. W. Va. Sep. 5, 2025).*

There was reasonable suspicion for stopping defendants on a SEPTA bus after a robbery where they matched the description down to one’s specific pants. United States v. Humphrey, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 196470 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 1, 2025).*

The officer doesn’t have to be “mathematically correct” that there was one car length per 10 mph for following too close. The question is reasonableness. United States v. Larin, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 196625 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 3, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Third Party Doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.