CA10: Having the driver get out is within the scope of any traffic stop

Having the driver come back to the patrol car is a basic safety concern within the scope of any traffic stop. United States v. Brown, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 23113 (10th Cir. Sep. 8, 2025).

“Voorhis’s false arrest claim is meritless based on the ‘any-crime rule.’ Rivera-Guadalupe, 124 F.4th at 303. According to the any-crime rule, a police officer defendant can defeat a false arrest claim by showing that he had probable cause to arrest the plaintiff for ‘any offense that could be charged under the circumstances.’ Id. at 299 (quoting Wright v. City of Phila., 409 F.3d 595, 602 (3d Cir. 2005)). ‘[P]robable cause to arrest exists if there is a ‘fair probability’ that the person committed the crime at issue.’ Dempsey v. Bucknell Univ., 834 F.3d 457, 467 (3d Cir. 2016) (internal quotations and citation omitted).” Voorhis v. Ginkel, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 22973 (3d Cir. Sep. 5, 2025).*

The bookbag found in defendant’s room was searched under his release conditions waiver. He doesn’t even claim it was his for standing [which was a moot point]. State v. Thompson, 2025-Ohio-3262 (9th Dist. Sep. 10, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.