E.D.Ky.: DTF stop on interstate wasn’t pretextual when it was objectively reasonable for overtinting

It doesn’t matter that DTF officers were on the interstate and ordered defendant’s stop for a window tint violation because there was objective justification for it. The rest of the stop was with reasonable suspicion for the drug dog. United States v. Jackson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 270126 (E.D. Ky. Dec. 18, 2025).*

This involves a warrant for a package sought by the Postal Inspectors executed the same day. The failure of the warrant to specify when it should be executed by, Rule 41 says in 14 days, doesn’t void the warrant. United States v. Odubajo, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3968 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 9, 2026).

No malicious prosecution claim for pretrial detention under a judicial order issued on probable cause. Besosa-Noceda v. Torres, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 319 (1st Cir. Jan. 7, 2026).*

The information as a whole shows probable cause. (The court alludes to Franks, but it’s not remotely an issue.) State v. Starkey, 2026-Ohio-42 (5th Dist. Jan. 8, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Pretext, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Staleness, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.