Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

GA: Dog sniff during the first part of the stop while computer checks going on didn’t prolong it

“[T]he trial court was entitled to find that the questioning and free-air dog sniff were done concurrently with other tasks related to the mission of the traffic stop and therefore did not impermissibly prolong the stop.” Avant v. State, 2025 … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on GA: Dog sniff during the first part of the stop while computer checks going on didn’t prolong it

D.Kan.: Apt building parking lot not curtilage

The apartment building’s parking lot was not part of the curtilage. United States v. Isaac, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120584 (D. Kan. June 24, 2025). Defendant was wanted on a PV warrant. A warrant task force located a place he … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Apt building parking lot not curtilage

E.D.Okla.: Entry to look for shooting victim was reasonable

Officer’s entry to look for a potential shooting victim was reasonable on exigent circumstances. United States v. Bird, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112088 (E.D. Okla. May 7, 2025).* Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging defendant’s taking DNA by warrant. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, DNA, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Okla.: Entry to look for shooting victim was reasonable

OR: State didn’t develop alternative search theory just by mentioning it

The state didn’t sufficiently develop search incident as an alternative theory to sustain the search merely by mentioning it. State v. Ribota, 341 Or. App. 32 (June 4, 2025). There is a fact question for trial for excessive force, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on OR: State didn’t develop alternative search theory just by mentioning it

NJ: Entering curtilage to plant GPS device on car exceeded tracking warrant and was suppressed

Police had an otherwise valid warrant to install a tracking device on defendant’s vehicle but in a public place. Instead, they entered the curtilage to install it there. This warrant execution violated the Fourth Amendment and state constitution. The tracking … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NJ: Entering curtilage to plant GPS device on car exceeded tracking warrant and was suppressed

S.D.Ohio: Casting state court’s failure to follow 4A precedent more closely as a due process violation still Stone barred

2254 petitioner’s due process claim that the state court denied due process by not following precedent was barred by Stone. Allen v. Warden, SE. Corr. Inst., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104131 (S.D. Ohio June 2, 2025). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Casting state court’s failure to follow 4A precedent more closely as a due process violation still Stone barred

D.C.Cir.: Ptf stated 1A retaliation claim over civil investigative demand

Media Matters stated a claim in D.C. for First Amendment retaliation by the Texas Attorney General’s civil investigative demand for records based on not liking their reporting. Injunction affirmed. Media Matters for America v. Paxton, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 13155 … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Private search, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Ptf stated 1A retaliation claim over civil investigative demand

OH1: Drug dog’s instinctive jump into car window wasn’t unreasonable

The drug dog’s instinctive jump into the window of defendant’s car wasn’t initiated by the handler, so it wasn’t unreasonable. State v. Barton, 2025-Ohio-1904 (1st Dist. May 28, 2025) (2-1). “As already discussed, Parr had reason to believe Defendant was … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH1: Drug dog’s instinctive jump into car window wasn’t unreasonable

DE: Trial court holds Kansas v. Glover not followed under state constitution

A Delaware trial judge holds that the state constitution, adopted before the Fourth Amendment, provides more protection for motorists than Kansas v. Glover. State v. Coffey, 2025 Del. Super. LEXIS 266 (May 22, 2025). (This will be appealed.) There’s no … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on DE: Trial court holds Kansas v. Glover not followed under state constitution

M.D.Fla.: Incomplete PC showing here was essentially knowing, so motion to suppress granted

The police here presented incomplete probable cause here that a phone call could have corrected. Since the officer knew it (and that probable cause might be lacking) and said he was charging defendant anyway, the motion to suppress the automobile … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Incomplete PC showing here was essentially knowing, so motion to suppress granted

GA: GPS data in a child porn image on def’s phone was PC to search his house

GPS data in a child porn image on defendant’s phone was probable cause to search his house. Bibbs v. State, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 186 (May 13, 2025). Briefly crossing the centerline is not an offense unless it appears unsafe. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on GA: GPS data in a child porn image on def’s phone was PC to search his house

WA: 911 call about following a DUI was RS for stop

Officers could rely on a 911 call about an alleged drunk driver who was reporting what she was seeing. “Law enforcement officers may effectuate a Terry stop based on a 911 caller’s tip when the tip is reliable and contains … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Waiver | Comments Off on WA: 911 call about following a DUI was RS for stop

W.D.Va.: Not IAC to logically choose 4A arguments

Trial counsel wasn’t ineffective for not arguing his desired defendant’s personal Franks issue when lack of probable cause was a better issue. He also wasn’t ineffective for not arguing that GPS tracking across state lines was unreasonable. Appellate counsel wasn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Not IAC to logically choose 4A arguments

AR: Use of a CI for a SW creates no confrontation issue

The use of a CI for a search warrant creates no confrontation issue. Williams v. State, 2025 Ark. App. 252, 2025 Ark. App. LEXIS 254 (Apr. 23, 2025). It was appellate counsel’s choice to not pursue defendant’s search claim on … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Anticipatory warrant, Ineffective assistance, Privileges | Comments Off on AR: Use of a CI for a SW creates no confrontation issue

N.D.Iowa: Protective sweep during SW execution not confined by the warrant, if otherwise justified

While the question is close here, the protective sweep of defendant’s house during a search warrant was reasonable on the totality. Essentially, the search warrant doesn’t define the scope of a justified protective sweep. “[T]he Fourth Amendment permits law enforcement … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery, Protective sweep, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Protective sweep during SW execution not confined by the warrant, if otherwise justified

CO: PC a gun was in car permits search of trunk

Defendant was a suspect in a shooting incident. He was found outside a car. There was probable cause to believe the gun was inside the passenger compartment or trunk, even though the windows were down and the trunk closed when … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Scope of search | Comments Off on CO: PC a gun was in car permits search of trunk

CA10: Disabled vehicle left parked along a highway is subject to impoundment

A disabled vehicle left parked along a highway is subject to impoundment. Jones v. Woodrow, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8419 (10th Cir. Apr. 10, 2025).* Defendant’s stop was valid because of a defective LPN light. This led to discovering a … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Disabled vehicle left parked along a highway is subject to impoundment

S.D.Ill.: Mistake in SW address didn’t mislead police; no IAC for not raising it

Mistakes in search warrant papers happen, and they don’t suppress the search unless they are meaningful and prejudicial to the process. Here, it was a wrong address cured by other things that sent the police to the right place. McBride … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Particularity | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Mistake in SW address didn’t mislead police; no IAC for not raising it

PA: For crime of obstructing a search, def didn’t have to see SW to know there was one when he was told

Defendant’s conviction for obstructing a search is affirmed. He was not entitled to a jury instruction that he had to have seen or read the warrant first where it was not disputed that he knew there was a warrant. Commonwealth … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on PA: For crime of obstructing a search, def didn’t have to see SW to know there was one when he was told

D.D.C.: BLM 1A speech restriction claim can proceed as a class action

A class claim for the June 2020 Lafayette Square BLM protest is certified for the First Amendment speech restriction claims but not the retaliation claims because they do not satisfy commonality under Rule 23(a). Damages claims can be pursued separately. … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Nexus | Comments Off on D.D.C.: BLM 1A speech restriction claim can proceed as a class action