D.D.C.: BLM 1A speech restriction claim can proceed as a class action

A class claim for the June 2020 Lafayette Square BLM protest is certified for the First Amendment speech restriction claims but not the retaliation claims because they do not satisfy commonality under Rule 23(a). Damages claims can be pursued separately. Black Lives Matter D.C. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47417 (D.D.C. Mar. 14, 2025).

Not calling a paramedic at the scene whose report said defendant wasn’t under the influence wasn’t ineffective assistance of counsel. The paramedic’s testimony was that he got that orally from the defendant, which he had to accept. The trial court at the suppression hearing found the officer credible that defendant was under the influence. In light of that, it was speculative now that the paramedic would have sufficiently contradicted the officer to be more believable. State v. Harris, 2025-Ohio-825 (4th Dist. Mar. 6, 2025).*

After a shooting in Boston, the defendants fled to one defendant’s mother’s place where the other changed clothes. Nexus for a warrant for her apartment was shown. Commonwealth v. Phillips, 2025 Mass. LEXIS 107 (Mar. 13, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Nexus. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.