S.D.Tex.: Govt can’t raise new 4A exception in motion to reconsider

While executing a search warrant, officers compelled defendant to provide the passcode to the safe. The court suppressed the contents of the safe because it was not a valid consent. The government doesn’t get to argue inevitable discovery on a motion to reconsider. That should have been raised in its original response. United States v. Villarreal-Resendiz, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226914 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 2, 2026).

Defendant had no standing to challenge the search of his sister’s apartment. He was just an occasional visitor there. State v. Jones, 2026-Ohio-3893 (2d Dist. Oct. 2, 2026).*

Defendant’s hand-to-hand drug transaction watched by police was probable cause for his arrest. United States v. Mayberry, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 30244 (10th Cir. Oct. 2, 2026).*

In any ineffective assistance of counsel claim, petitioner has to show that if defense counsel did what he or she should have, they would have prevailed, whether it’s a motion to suppress or objection not made. Nelson v. Cain, 375 Or. 614 (Oct. 1, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.