Author Archives: Hall

GA: REP against dog sniff at apartment door in gated complex where management let police in

A dog sniff at defendant’s apartment door seams was unreasonable, despite it being in a common area of a gated apartment building [where the general public wasn’t allowed, but management let the police in]. State v. West, 2026 Ga. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on GA: REP against dog sniff at apartment door in gated complex where management let police in

E.D.Cal.: Email seizure can be overbroad, but actual search has to be reasonably narrowed

In digital information searches, overseizure to start is permitted to facilitate the process, but the review of all that information has to be limited, and here it was. United States v. Flores, 802 F.3d 1028, 1044 (9th Cir. 2015). United … Continue reading →

Posted in Digital Searches, E-mail, Overseizure | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Email seizure can be overbroad, but actual search has to be reasonably narrowed

D.Mass.: Late disclosed information provided Franks challenge

How one defendant made a Franks challenge to get a hearing out of late disclosed information. United States v. Gonzalez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3229 (D. Mass. Jan. 8, 2026)*:

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Late disclosed information provided Franks challenge

D.Ariz.: No standing while violating order of protection

Being inside the garage of this house in violation of an order of protection means no standing. Hernandez v. Chandler, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3096 (D. Ariz. Jan. 7, 2026). The visual sweep of defendant’s car was just meticulous and … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: No standing while violating order of protection

CA9: RIPP restraint was seizure and no QI here

Decedent died in a police car with an RIPP restraint bending him backwards. That’s a seizure, and the officers here do not get qualified immunity in the excessive force claim. Gonzalez v. City of Phx., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 426 … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: RIPP restraint was seizure and no QI here

NC: DL, LPN, and insurance checkpoint was reasonable

The Saint Pauls NC police department set up a two-hour checkpoint to stop all cars to check for “violations of license, registration, and insurance requirements.” Defendant was stopped and asked for his DL but he didn’t have one. The smell … Continue reading →

Posted in Roadblocks | Comments Off on NC: DL, LPN, and insurance checkpoint was reasonable

MA: Arguing a “reddish-brown substance” could be a bunch of things and not blood “amounts to the type of ‘hypercritical analysis’ that is improper when reviewing search warrant affidavits”

The search warrant for defendant’s place for evidence of a murder showed nexus and probable cause including his car (because of distance to the homicide) and laptop (communicating with the victim). It was reasonable for the magistrate to conclude that … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on MA: Arguing a “reddish-brown substance” could be a bunch of things and not blood “amounts to the type of ‘hypercritical analysis’ that is improper when reviewing search warrant affidavits”

LATimes: Why LAPD and other police agencies discourage shooting at cars — and why ICE still does

LATimes: Why LAPD and other police agencies discourage shooting at cars — and why ICE still does by Libor Jany:

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on LATimes: Why LAPD and other police agencies discourage shooting at cars — and why ICE still does

TX13: Student’s surreptitious recording of school resource officer planning to plant evidence violated no REP

Defendant was a school resource officer who wanted to search a classroom for a vape. The students were all ordered out of the class. One left her phone on record and captured the officer finding the vape and then discussing … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX13: Student’s surreptitious recording of school resource officer planning to plant evidence violated no REP

404 Media: Inside ICE’s Tool to Monitor Phones in Entire Neighborhoods

404 Media: Inside ICE’s Tool to Monitor Phones in Entire Neighborhoods by Joseph Cox (“A social media and phone surveillance system ICE bought access to is designed to monitor a city neighborhood or block for mobile phones, track the movements … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on 404 Media: Inside ICE’s Tool to Monitor Phones in Entire Neighborhoods

Iowa declines to reject Mimms or Wilson under the state constitution on ordering occupants out of the car

Iowa declines to reject Mimms or Wilson under the state constitution on ordering occupants out of the car. State v. Willer, 2026 Iowa App. LEXIS 46 (Jan. 7, 2026):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on Iowa declines to reject Mimms or Wilson under the state constitution on ordering occupants out of the car

ID: Time on seized video was erroneous and it was within particularity of SW

The search warrant for a GoPro video was valid based on the time of the search shown on the video being erroneous. Practical accuracy is the touchstone, and the correct time could be reconstructed. The warrant was particular. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Particularity, Seizure | Comments Off on ID: Time on seized video was erroneous and it was within particularity of SW

N.D.N.Y.: Def’s immigration arrest was unreasonable and the product is suppressed

Defendant’s immigration arrest was unreasonable and the product is suppressed. United States v. Juarez-Lopez, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 269401 (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 18, 2025)*:

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Def’s immigration arrest was unreasonable and the product is suppressed

D.S.C.: Alleged unauthorized officers executing SW under state law not a 4A violation

Plaintiff’s claim unauthorized officers executed the search warrant under state law isn’t a Fourth Amendment violation. Richard v. Jeffcoat, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1512 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2026). Based on the search warrant, “The government may not disclose [at trial] … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Custody, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Alleged unauthorized officers executing SW under state law not a 4A violation

WI: Interlock device from 2008 BAC refusal proper civil penalty

Refusal of a BAC can legitimately have civil consequences without violating the Fourth Amendment per Birchfield. Here it was a 2008 refusal that led to an interlock in 2013 that was recently violated. State v. Sparby-Duncan, 2026 Wisc. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Drug or alcohol testing, Forfeiture, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on WI: Interlock device from 2008 BAC refusal proper civil penalty

CA9: In school seizure of plaintiff’s cell phone for 30 minutes was not unreasonable

In school seizure of plaintiff’s cell phone for 30 minutes was not unreasonable and “not excessively intrusive.” McGuire v. Roseville Joint Union High Sch. Dist., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 172 (9th Cir. Jan. 6, 2026). “Valdivia counters that [the officer’s] … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, School searches | Comments Off on CA9: In school seizure of plaintiff’s cell phone for 30 minutes was not unreasonable

CA10: A search incident to arrest isn’t valid when there’s no arrest

A search incident to arrest isn’t valid when there’s no arrest. The law is clearly established, so no qualified immunity. Montgomery v. Cruz, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 161 (10th Cir. Jan. 6, 2026). The defense succeeded in a Franks challenge … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Search incident | Comments Off on CA10: A search incident to arrest isn’t valid when there’s no arrest

S.D.Cal.: Notebook of passwords was within the scope of a CSAM warrant

During a child pornography warranted search, officers found a notebook of passwords, and it was within the scope of the warrant. United States v. Lira-Prado, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 982 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). One child pornography warrant led … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Overbreadth, Scope of search | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Notebook of passwords was within the scope of a CSAM warrant

E.D.Mich.: Defense can’t use SCA to get emails, even if they’re exculpatory

Only a governmental entity gets to use the Stored Communications Act to get emails. The defense can’t do it seeking even alleged exculpatory emails. Perry v. Silverthon, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 828 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 5, 2026). “Single-incident liability ‘is … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Overbreadth, Particularity, Stored Communications Act | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Defense can’t use SCA to get emails, even if they’re exculpatory

Sixth edition arrived today

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Sixth edition arrived today