CA9: In school seizure of plaintiff’s cell phone for 30 minutes was not unreasonable

In school seizure of plaintiff’s cell phone for 30 minutes was not unreasonable and “not excessively intrusive.” McGuire v. Roseville Joint Union High Sch. Dist., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 172 (9th Cir. Jan. 6, 2026).

“Valdivia counters that [the officer’s] inability to articulate a specific crime he suspected had been, or was about to be, committed means he lacked reasonable and articulable suspicion. … Even if Porsch was required to identify a specific crime, he did so here.” Valdivia v. Porsch, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 158 (8th Cir. Jan. 6, 2026).*

The search warrant for this video security system produced records showing that video files, likely of a shooting, had been deleted. Simandl v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 15 (Jan. 6, 2026) (unpublished).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, School searches. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.