GA: REP against dog sniff at apartment door in gated complex where management let police in

A dog sniff at defendant’s apartment door seams was unreasonable, despite it being in a common area of a gated apartment building [where the general public wasn’t allowed, but management let the police in]. State v. West, 2026 Ga. App. LEXIS 11 (Jan. 9, 2026). [Not much analysis here. The strongest argument is that the police had to be let in. Other tenants would be around, but not the public.]

The motion to suppress wasn’t timely and should be denied for that reason alone. On the merits anyway, it is denied because defendant’s gun was visible from outside the car, and the police could seize it under the community caretaking function. United States v. Bradley, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2741 (S.D. Ill. Jan. 7, 2026).*

“The body camera videos do not ‘blatantly contradict’ the district court’s findings that officers continued to use force after McCoy was subdued.” They get qualified immunity. Bruner v. Cassidy, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 413 (10th Cir. Jan. 8, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.