Author Archives: Hall

WI: A description of a Harley in Wisconsin in April is generic and not RS

The description of the offending vehicle as a Harley in Wisconsin is so generic it can’t support a stop. “After all, Wisconsin is the home of Harley-Davidson, and it is one of, if not the most popular manufacturers of motorcycles … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: A description of a Harley in Wisconsin in April is generic and not RS

S.D.Cal.: Release condition with firearm restriction and search waiver did not violate 2A or 4A

Defendant’s release condition of a firearm restriction and Fourth Amendment waiver because of a prior misdemeanor firearms conviction doesn’t violate the Second Amendment under New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen (2022). Heller supports the court’s conclusion. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Release condition with firearm restriction and search waiver did not violate 2A or 4A

CA9: Private search of CSLI made it admissible in admin proceeding

The Washington State Department of Labor and Industries received information from whistleblowers of cell site location information the defendant business collected to show alleged violations of state law. This was a private search, and Carpenter is not implicated. Kleiser v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Inventory, Private search | Comments Off on CA9: Private search of CSLI made it admissible in admin proceeding

E.D.Wis.: Being a corporate official alone doesn’t confer standing

Defendants are corporate officials of a business that was searched. That fact alone doesn’t give them standing, and the motion papers don’t really help. This is a search under a warrant, and the defendants carry the burden on standing and … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Being a corporate official alone doesn’t confer standing

TX14: PC for a cell phone requires more than a bare conclusion one was present or involved; no PC here

“A probable cause affidavit supporting a cell phone search must contain evidence of the requisite nexus with more than mere conclusory allegations. For example, the Court of Criminal Appeals recently held that generic, boilerplate language about cell phone use among … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on TX14: PC for a cell phone requires more than a bare conclusion one was present or involved; no PC here

IN: Mistake of law to an illegal search or seizure applies to the scope of the law, not whether it even exists

The mistake of law “defense” to an illegal search or seizure applies to the scope of the law, not whether it even exists. Here, it didn’t. White v. State, 2022 Ind. App. LEXIS 390 (Dec. 8, 2022). The specific characteristics … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IN: Mistake of law to an illegal search or seizure applies to the scope of the law, not whether it even exists

OH: Opening car door was to secure uncooperative def, not search; plain view valid

Opening the car door was not for the purpose of searching; it was to secure the uncooperative defendant. During the interaction, evidence in plain view was seen and the officer then could enter the car to secure it. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Mail and packages, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity, Search, Standing | Comments Off on OH: Opening car door was to secure uncooperative def, not search; plain view valid

D.Alaska: On reconsideration, govt revealed officer misconduct, and court finds him not credible

After defendant’s motion to suppress was denied, the government alerted the court and defense to an internal investigation of the state trooper involved just concluded where 43 instances of violation of policy and procedure were documented. The search here turned … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Community caretaking function, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Alaska: On reconsideration, govt revealed officer misconduct, and court finds him not credible

NY2: SW papers provided to GJ aren’t discoverable because of GJ secrecy

Defendant sought search warrant materials presented to the grand jury. Denied because of grand jury secrecy. Sculti v. Finley, 2022 NY Slip Op 06950, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6820 (2d Dept. Dec. 7, 2022). Defendant had no standing in … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant papers | Comments Off on NY2: SW papers provided to GJ aren’t discoverable because of GJ secrecy

NJ: CI’s identity not material to a civil case over arson

This is a subrogation claim over a fire caused by arson. Padilla was convicted. The civil case resulted in getting discovery of the DA’s file. After that, the name of a CI for a search warrant was sought, and it … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NJ: CI’s identity not material to a civil case over arson

N.D.Fla.: SW used to get caller information on Google Voice call

Here, the government got a search warrant for information from Google over who placed a Google voice call. United States v. Alford, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219552 (N.D. Fla. Nov. 8, 2022),* adopted, CoA denied, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218090 … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: SW used to get caller information on Google Voice call

Cal.3d: Parole search of glove compartment of car where parolee was backseat passenger was unreasonable

The parole search of a car’s glove compartment because of a parolee backseat passenger was unreasonable. Because the glove compartment was locked, it wasn’t possible for the key in the ignition to be used to unlock it while the vehicle … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cal.3d: Parole search of glove compartment of car where parolee was backseat passenger was unreasonable

W.D.Pa.: All Writs Act proceeding for tracking order is a judicial proceeding for common law right of access to records

An All Writs Act proceeding by the government to track someone in real time back in 2020 is a judicial record subject to the common law right of disclosure of court records. In re Forbes Media LLC, 2022 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule, Tracking warrant, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: All Writs Act proceeding for tracking order is a judicial proceeding for common law right of access to records

CA4: Govt is not responsible when a subpoenaed party turns over more than was sought

The government is not responsible when a subpoenaed party turns over more than was sought. United States v. Taylor, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 33418 (4th Cir. Dec. 5, 2022). Officers executing a search warrant at defendant’s house repeatedly made it … Continue reading →

Posted in Custody, Foreign searches, Forfeiture, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA4: Govt is not responsible when a subpoenaed party turns over more than was sought

Grid News: Can police use facial recognition as probable cause? Probably not, but some are doing it anyway

Grid News: Can police use facial recognition as probable cause? Probably not, but some are doing it anyway (“A new report from the Georgetown Center for Privacy Technology argues that facial recognition has serious flaws that make it unreliable for … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on Grid News: Can police use facial recognition as probable cause? Probably not, but some are doing it anyway

OH1: Failure to follow probation search statute doesn’t require exclusion

Defendant’s argument that the probation search statute wasn’t followed doesn’t require exclusion. That’s for constitutional violations. State v. Clardy, 2022-Ohio-4300, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 4070 (1st Dist. Dec. 2, 2022); State v. Kellett, 2022-Ohio-4340, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 4088 (5th … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on OH1: Failure to follow probation search statute doesn’t require exclusion

MI: Automobile repair business is pervasively regulated

The trial court erred in suppressing the search of defendant’s automobile repair business which was a pervasively regulated business. The search was during the work week during regular hours and was for evidence of compliance with the Motor Vehicle Service … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: Automobile repair business is pervasively regulated

CA8: No standing to challenge GPS already installed in CS’s car he borrowed

Defendant had no standing to contest installation of a GPS by the CS in the vehicle he loaned to defendant. Jones specifically recognized this. United States v. Dewilfond, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 33273 (8th Cir. Dec. 2, 2022). Defendant was … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: No standing to challenge GPS already installed in CS’s car he borrowed

E.D.Mich.: Parole search can occur when parolee not home

Defendant was on state parole living with his girlfriend, also a defendant. They were out and her mother was their babysitter in the home. Parole came by for a compliance check. The mother let them in. First, the search was … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Parole search can occur when parolee not home

IN: dog sniff outside a hotel room door was reasonable under the state constitution

A dog sniff outside a hotel room door was reasonable under the state constitution. (And, while other information was illegally gathered, this was enough for the warrant.) Crabtree v. State, 2022 Ind. App. LEXIS 385 (Dec. 1, 2022). Excessive force … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, School searches | Comments Off on IN: dog sniff outside a hotel room door was reasonable under the state constitution