MI: Automobile repair business is pervasively regulated

The trial court erred in suppressing the search of defendant’s automobile repair business which was a pervasively regulated business. The search was during the work week during regular hours and was for evidence of compliance with the Motor Vehicle Service and Repair Act. The searches of other cars on the premises were reasonable, too. People v. Vaughn, 2022 Mich. App. LEXIS 7017 (Dec. 1, 2022).

A child porn defendant properly had a computer search condition imposed on him during seven years of supervised release. United States v. Sigala-Salazar, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 33308 (9th Cir. Dec. 2, 2022).*

There was reasonable suspicion for the stop of defendant’s vehicle, for different reasons than given by the USMJ. United States v. Williams, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217280 (D. Minn. Dec. 2, 2022).*

The CI’s correct predictive information was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop. United States v. Chandler, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 33297 (6th Cir. Nov. 30, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.