W.D.Pa.: All Writs Act proceeding for tracking order is a judicial proceeding for common law right of access to records

An All Writs Act proceeding by the government to track someone in real time back in 2020 is a judicial record subject to the common law right of disclosure of court records. In re Forbes Media LLC, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218139 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 2, 2022).

Officer’s failure to consider exculpatory evidence before getting an arrest warrant can create a jury question on whether the officer really believed he had probable cause for arrest. Hart v. Collins, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217898 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 2, 2022).*

“[W]hile the exclusionary rule does not apply to revocation proceedings, the exclusion of evidence obtained as a result of harassment or in a particularly offensive manner is required.” State v. Sarkissian, 2022 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 518 (Dec. 2, 2022) (recognizing rule).

A reformulated search and seizure claim based on alleged newly discovered evidence isn’t ground for a successor habeas. In re Jackson, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 33356 (11th Cir. Dec. 2, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule, Tracking warrant, Warrant papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.