N.D.Fla.: SW used to get caller information on Google Voice call

Here, the government got a search warrant for information from Google over who placed a Google voice call. United States v. Alford, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219552 (N.D. Fla. Nov. 8, 2022),* adopted, CoA denied, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218090 (N.D. Fla. Dec. 3, 2022).*

Defendant’s specific violation of privacy challenge by the state changed between the trial court and the appeal, and it would not be considered. State v. Rogers, 2022-NCCOA-828, 2022 N.C. App. LEXIS 810 (Dec. 6, 2022) (unpublished).*

Defendant litigated his search claim in state court and appealed. He can’t revise the issue and raise it again as in habeas when he already had the “full and fair opportunity” to litigate it. United States v. Bennett, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218932 (D. Mont. Dec. 5, 2022).*

The search of defendant’s car was without his consent, but, based on the suppression hearing testimony, valid as an inventory. United States v. Thompson, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218936 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.