Author Archives: Hall

CA10: Def’s response ‘I don’t have a backpack’ was abandonment of the backpack

“Mr. Porter nonetheless attempts to distinguish this case from our other abandonment cases, claiming that in those cases, the defendant’s denial of ownership was clear and unequivocal. But it is hard to imagine a statement plainer than ‘I don’t have … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Private search | Comments Off on CA10: Def’s response ‘I don’t have a backpack’ was abandonment of the backpack

N.D.W.Va.: Pulling open def’s pocket to search it was intentional and unreasonable; exclusionary rule applied

Pulling open defendant’s pocket to search it was intentional and required applying the exclusionary rule. United States v. Jenkins, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74739 (N.D. W.Va. Apr. 28, 2023). The close relationship between the participants supported probable cause. It was … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Exclusionary rule, Inventory, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: Pulling open def’s pocket to search it was intentional and unreasonable; exclusionary rule applied

OH3: Def’s motion to determine legality of arrest never sought to suppress anything and wasn’t appealable

Defendant’s motion to determine the legality of his arrest was not even called a motion to suppress. It was not even appealable as it was framed. “[T]he motion filed by Sanchez on October 28, 2020, was not captioned a ‘motion … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Motion to suppress, Probation / Parole search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH3: Def’s motion to determine legality of arrest never sought to suppress anything and wasn’t appealable

M.D.Pa.: Holding ptf’s car for 9 weeks without justification states 5A, not 4A, claim

Police seized plaintiff’s car and held it without justification for nine weeks. Plaintiff’s states a claim under the Fifth Amendment, but not the Fourth. Kelly v. Bell, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74807 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 28, 2023). “A search-warrant advisory … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Holding ptf’s car for 9 weeks without justification states 5A, not 4A, claim

D.Minn.: Warrant for ion scan of defendant’s door and door frame was issued on PC

Because a drug dog wouldn’t alert to fentanyl, the government showed probable cause on the totality of circumstances for an ion scan of defendant’s apartment door for traces of fentanyl. Warrants for ion scans have been approved in other cases. … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Warrant for ion scan of defendant’s door and door frame was issued on PC

ABA: Regulating Forensic Genetic Genealogy: Balancing Privacy Concerns with the Needs of Law Enforcement in a Time of Consumer DNA Testing Services

Regulating Forensic Genetic Genealogy: Balancing Privacy Concerns with the Needs of Law Enforcement in a Time of Consumer DNA Testing Services by Devinder Hans (ABA Mar. 28, 2023)

Posted in DNA, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on ABA: Regulating Forensic Genetic Genealogy: Balancing Privacy Concerns with the Needs of Law Enforcement in a Time of Consumer DNA Testing Services

CAAF: The methodology of a search doesn’t have to be the best to still be reasonable

A flashing incident on a Marine base in December 2018 led to a search authorization of defendant’s cell phone. The images on the phone were first sorted by size instead of date, and that led to accidentally discovering an apparent … Continue reading →

Posted in Overseizure, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CAAF: The methodology of a search doesn’t have to be the best to still be reasonable

CO: Typo in date (9/9 v. 9/30) in SW affidavit could be overlooked by other contents referring to previous few hours; GFE also applies

The typographical error in the affidavit showing the date as September 9th when it should have been September 30th could be overlooked because the affidavit as a whole referred to the previous few hours, and the good faith exception applies. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search, Staleness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CO: Typo in date (9/9 v. 9/30) in SW affidavit could be overlooked by other contents referring to previous few hours; GFE also applies

PA: No standing to challenge Google SW for who searched rape victim’s name before crime

In a home invasion rape case, the state sought from Google search information involving the victim’s name in the 48 hours before the rape, and there were searches for that from defendant’s IP address. Defendant had no reasonable expectation of … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Standing, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on PA: No standing to challenge Google SW for who searched rape victim’s name before crime

TN: By killing one’s host, guest standing is lost

By attacking and killing his hosts, his parents, defendant lost guest standing, if he would have had it at all. Police conducted a welfare check and found severed body parts in plastic tubs and on the stove, including a head … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Standing, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on TN: By killing one’s host, guest standing is lost

CA8: Merely pointing a Taser not a seizure

Pointing a Taser at plaintiff was not a seizure. Pollreis v. Marzolf, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 10269 (8th Cir. Apr. 27, 2023). Even if possession of a firearm in a concealed carry state was not unlawful, smoking marijuana with a … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Excessive force, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Merely pointing a Taser not a seizure

CA11: Roadside dog sniff during the records check was reasonable and did not extend the stop

A roadside dog sniff during the records check was reasonable even without reasonable suspicion and did not extend the stop. United States v. Ramirez-Rivera, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 10325 (11th Cir. Apr. 27, 2023). On collective knowledge: “As the surveillance … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: Roadside dog sniff during the records check was reasonable and did not extend the stop

WY: Inventory policy reasonably permitted opening containers

The inventory policy reasonably permitted opening containers. Beckwith v. State, 2023 WY 39, 2023 Wyo. LEXIS 39 (Apr. 27, 2023). Years after a seizure but still pre-indictment, the plaintiff sought return of property while the government was still investigating. It’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Scope of search, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on WY: Inventory policy reasonably permitted opening containers

D.Kan.: “Indicia of ownership” in a SW not overbroad

Inclusion of “indicia of ownership” of the place searched doesn’t show the warrant was not particular. United States v. Anderson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73033 (D. Kan. Apr. 26, 2023). Defendant was stopped for a traffic violation, although there was … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Kan.: “Indicia of ownership” in a SW not overbroad

D.Kan.: “The opening of the driver’s door had no effect or impact on the dog’s alert.”

“The opening of the driver’s door had no effect or impact on the dog’s alert.” United States v. Anderson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73033 (D. Kan. Apr. 26, 2023). The facts in the record support the automobile exception as the … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Kan.: “The opening of the driver’s door had no effect or impact on the dog’s alert.”

TX: New crime in resisting illegal arrest doesn’t depend on gravity of the new offense

Appellant resisted an illegal patdown and was Tased and charged with obstruction and resisting. A new offense is an intervening circumstance under Brown, and it doesn’t matter whether it is “serious” or not. Massey v. State, 2023 Tex. Crim. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Informant hearsay, Protective sweep | Comments Off on TX: New crime in resisting illegal arrest doesn’t depend on gravity of the new offense

IL4: Despite legalization of possession of small amounts of MJ, dog alert still PC

The drug dog’s “positive alert on the vehicle in this case established a fair probability that drugs or evidence of a crime would be found in the vehicle. This is true despite recent changes in the law regarding the legalization … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on IL4: Despite legalization of possession of small amounts of MJ, dog alert still PC

MN: Underlying conviction can’t be challenged on 4A grounds

In a driver’s license suspension case, the fact an underlying out of state driving offense was allegedly obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is no defense. It was final. Underhill v. Comm’r of Pub. Safety, 2023 Minn. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on MN: Underlying conviction can’t be challenged on 4A grounds

OH12: Fact LEO broke traffic laws to catch speeder isn’t a 4A reasonableness defense

The fact a police officer arguably broke traffic laws to effect a stop of a fleeing motorist isn’t a defense to a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment or the state constitution. State v. Johnson, 2023-Ohio-1320, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH12: Fact LEO broke traffic laws to catch speeder isn’t a 4A reasonableness defense

OH9: Growing house fire next door was exigency to clear def’s house

Defendant’s next door neighbor’s house caught on fire, and police at the scene acted reasonably in entering his house to clear it when the fire grew and they reasonably feared it would spread to the houses next door. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Border search, Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Immigration arrests, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Standing | Comments Off on OH9: Growing house fire next door was exigency to clear def’s house